Laurence Bonjour
Biographic Data
| ID | 958256 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Laurence Bonjour |
| GIVEN NAMES | Laurence |
| FAMILY NAME | Bonjour |
| SIGNATURE | BONJOUR L |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Washington |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 27 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 59 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 27 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1975 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
O mito do conhecimento
Em “O Mito do Conhecimento”, Laurence BonJour defende a tese de que a concepção “falibilista” de conhecimento, assumida de modo preponderante pelos epistemólogos na era pós-Gettier, “está errada”, pois tal concepção “fraca” de conhecimento proporciona pouca satisfação da perspectiva filosófica e é inexistente no âmbito do senso comum, constituindo tão-somente um “mito filosófico”
The Myth of Knowledge: The Myth of Knowledge
Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses
Philosophical Problems: An Annotated Anthology
In Search of Direct Realism 1
Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues (Great Debates in Philosophy)
Internalism and Externalism
Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses (Elements of Philosophy)
In Defense of Pure Reason
Replies
General Foundations versus Rational Insight
Inference and Insight
Précis of In Defense of Pure Reason
Empiricism, Rationalism and the Limits of Justification
Digging Deeper for the A Priori
Experience and A Priori Justification
The Indispensability of Internalism
In Defense of Pure Reason
Haack on Justification and Experience
Is thought a symbolic process
Empirical Knowledge
Epistemic Responsibility
Reply to Solomon
The first objection appeals to the familiar idea that theories are underdetermined by evidence. Solomon argues that there will always be many possible alternative and incompatible systems of belief which satisfy all of the coherentist justificatory constraints to which the metajustificatory argument appeals, i.e. which are equally coherent, satisfy the observation requirement, and remain stable over time. Since these different systems cannot all …
The structure of empirical knowledge
Skepticism, Justification, and Explanation
Thought
Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge
Skepticism, Justification, and Explanation
The structure of empirical knowledge
Epistemic Responsibility
Reply to Solomon
The first objection appeals to the familiar idea that theories are underdetermined by evidence. Solomon argues that there will always be many possible alternative and incompatible systems of belief which satisfy all of the coherentist justificatory constraints to which the metajustificatory argument appeals, i.e. which are equally coherent, satisfy the observation requirement, and remain stable over time. Since these different systems cannot all …
Is thought a symbolic process
Empirical Knowledge
Haack on Justification and Experience
In Defense of Pure Reason
In Defense of Pure Reason
Replies
General Foundations versus Rational Insight
Inference and Insight
Précis of In Defense of Pure Reason
Empiricism, Rationalism and the Limits of Justification
Digging Deeper for the A Priori
Experience and A Priori Justification
The Indispensability of Internalism
Internalism and Externalism
Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses (Elements of Philosophy)
Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues (Great Debates in Philosophy)
In Search of Direct Realism 1
Philosophical Problems: An Annotated Anthology
The Myth of Knowledge: The Myth of Knowledge
Philosophy (20 works) · Epistemology (18 works) · Philosophy (15 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 works) · Computer Science (10 works) · Citation (8 works) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 works) · Library science (7 works) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 works) · Contemporary philosophy (5 works)