Jasper Debrabander
Biographic Data
| ID | 9592103 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jasper Debrabander |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jasper |
| FAMILY NAME | Debrabander |
| SIGNATURE | DEBRABANDER J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Ghent University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2084-9090 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 8 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Incidental findings in clinical imaging
Reframing the responsibility gap in medical artificial intelligence
The increasing use of AI in healthcare has sparked debates about responsibility and accountability for AI-related errors. The difficulty in attributing moral responsibility for undesirable outcomes caused by increasingly autonomous (often opaque) AI systems has become a new focal point in the debate on ‘responsibility gaps’. We approach the problem of these gaps by offering a framework that combines causal selection principles from the philosophy…
Autonomy and the right not to know incidental findings arising during treatment response monitoring
The moral right not to know (RNTK) is predominantly grounded in autonomy. This means that the scope, strength and nature of the moral RNTK is determined in light of the ethical principle of respect for autonomy. In this paper, I will further explore the relationship between patient autonomy and the scope of the RNTK in the context of treatment response monitoring. I focus on treatment response monitoring because novel challenges can be formulated…
On subjective measures of decision quality
In times of person‐centered care, it is all the more important to support patients in making good decisions about their care. One way to offer such support to patients is by way of Patient Decision Aids (PDAs). Ranging from patient brochures to web‐based tools, PDAs explicitly state the decisions patients face, inform them about their medical options, help them to clarify and discuss their values, and ultimately make a decision. However, lingerin…
Authenticity and the argument from testability
On the elusiveness of higher-order risk attitudes
On the relation between decision quality and autonomy in times of patient-centered care
Watson, autonomy and value flexibility
Many ethical concerns have been voiced about Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs). Special attention has been paid to the effect of CDSSs on autonomy, responsibility, fairness and transparency. This journal has featured a discussion between Rosalind McDougall and Ezio Di Nucci that focused on the impact of IBM’s Watson for Oncology (Watson) on autonomy. The present article elaborates on this discussion in three ways. First, using Jonathan Pu…
No prominent works on this page.
On the relation between decision quality and autonomy in times of patient-centered care
Watson, autonomy and value flexibility
Many ethical concerns have been voiced about Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs). Special attention has been paid to the effect of CDSSs on autonomy, responsibility, fairness and transparency. This journal has featured a discussion between Rosalind McDougall and Ezio Di Nucci that focused on the impact of IBM’s Watson for Oncology (Watson) on autonomy. The present article elaborates on this discussion in three ways. First, using Jonathan Pu…
Authenticity and the argument from testability
On the elusiveness of higher-order risk attitudes
On subjective measures of decision quality
In times of person‐centered care, it is all the more important to support patients in making good decisions about their care. One way to offer such support to patients is by way of Patient Decision Aids (PDAs). Ranging from patient brochures to web‐based tools, PDAs explicitly state the decisions patients face, inform them about their medical options, help them to clarify and discuss their values, and ultimately make a decision. However, lingerin…
Incidental findings in clinical imaging
Reframing the responsibility gap in medical artificial intelligence
The increasing use of AI in healthcare has sparked debates about responsibility and accountability for AI-related errors. The difficulty in attributing moral responsibility for undesirable outcomes caused by increasingly autonomous (often opaque) AI systems has become a new focal point in the debate on ‘responsibility gaps’. We approach the problem of these gaps by offering a framework that combines causal selection principles from the philosophy…
Autonomy and the right not to know incidental findings arising during treatment response monitoring
The moral right not to know (RNTK) is predominantly grounded in autonomy. This means that the scope, strength and nature of the moral RNTK is determined in light of the ethical principle of respect for autonomy. In this paper, I will further explore the relationship between patient autonomy and the scope of the RNTK in the context of treatment response monitoring. I focus on treatment response monitoring because novel challenges can be formulated…
Computer Science (6 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Autonomy (4 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Ethics in Clinical Research (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Ethics in medical practice (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 works)