Abeezar I Sarela
Biographic Data
| ID | 9596376 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Abeezar I Sarela |
| GIVEN NAMES | Abeezar I |
| FAMILY NAME | Sarela |
| SIGNATURE | SARELA A I |
| AFFILIATIONS | Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7785-9732 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Can medical ethics truly be independent of law
The Supreme Court’s decision in McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board
The UK Supreme Court’s recent judgement in McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board clarifies the standard for the identification of ‘reasonable’ alternative medical treatments. The required standard is that of a reasonable doctor: treatments that would be accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical opinion. Accordingly, the assessment of consent involves a two-stage test: first, a ‘reasonable doctor’ test for identifying alternative treatme…
Deference to patients’ risk attitudes is contingent on medical norms
Does the General Medical Council’s 2020 guidance on consent advance on its 2008 guidance
The General Medical Council renewed its guidance on consent in 2020. In this essay, I argue that the 2020 guidance does not advance on the earlier, 2008 guidance in regard to treatments that doctors are obliged to offer to patients. In both, doctors are instructed to not provide treatments that are not in the overall benefit, or clinical interests, of the patient; although, patients are absolutely entitled to decline treatment. As such, consent h…
Rawlsian justice in healthcare
Cox and Fritz state the central problem as the absence of a framework for healthcare policy decisions; but, they overlook the theoretical underpinnings of public law. In response, they propose a two-step procedure to guide fair decision-making. The first step relies on Thomas Scanlon’s ‘contractualism’ for stakeholders to consider whether, or not, they could reasonably reject policy proposals made by others; then in the second step, John Rawls’s …
No prominent works on this page.
Does the General Medical Council’s 2020 guidance on consent advance on its 2008 guidance
The General Medical Council renewed its guidance on consent in 2020. In this essay, I argue that the 2020 guidance does not advance on the earlier, 2008 guidance in regard to treatments that doctors are obliged to offer to patients. In both, doctors are instructed to not provide treatments that are not in the overall benefit, or clinical interests, of the patient; although, patients are absolutely entitled to decline treatment. As such, consent h…
Rawlsian justice in healthcare
Cox and Fritz state the central problem as the absence of a framework for healthcare policy decisions; but, they overlook the theoretical underpinnings of public law. In response, they propose a two-step procedure to guide fair decision-making. The first step relies on Thomas Scanlon’s ‘contractualism’ for stakeholders to consider whether, or not, they could reasonably reject policy proposals made by others; then in the second step, John Rawls’s …
Deference to patients’ risk attitudes is contingent on medical norms
Can medical ethics truly be independent of law
The Supreme Court’s decision in McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board
The UK Supreme Court’s recent judgement in McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board clarifies the standard for the identification of ‘reasonable’ alternative medical treatments. The required standard is that of a reasonable doctor: treatments that would be accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical opinion. Accordingly, the assessment of consent involves a two-stage test: first, a ‘reasonable doctor’ test for identifying alternative treatme…
Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Ethics in medical practice (3 works) · Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Alternative medicine (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 works) · Health care (2 works)