Valentin Goulette
Biographic Data
| ID | 9637093 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Valentin Goulette |
| GIVEN NAMES | Valentin |
| FAMILY NAME | Goulette |
| SIGNATURE | GOULETTE V |
| AFFILIATIONS | CLLE, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4967-5100 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Blame-validation
The Culpable Control Model assumes that causal judgments are irrational: a negative evaluative reaction to an agent would lead individuals to overestimate his causal contribution to a harm. However, the extent to which these judgments deviate from criteria of rationality remains unclear. The two present studies aimed at investigating conditions under which this effect occurs. Participants red a vignette in which the evaluative reaction was operat…
A question of detail
Causal pre-emption scenarios are problematic for the counterfactual framework of causation (CFC) because people judge an action to be the actual cause of an outcome although the outcome would have occurred anyway due to the action of a pre-empted alternative cause. We propose that commonsense causal questions typically probe specific events that actually happened as and how they did, and show that counterfactuals that probe specific events match …
No prominent works on this page.
A question of detail
Causal pre-emption scenarios are problematic for the counterfactual framework of causation (CFC) because people judge an action to be the actual cause of an outcome although the outcome would have occurred anyway due to the action of a pre-empted alternative cause. We propose that commonsense causal questions typically probe specific events that actually happened as and how they did, and show that counterfactuals that probe specific events match …
Blame-validation
The Culpable Control Model assumes that causal judgments are irrational: a negative evaluative reaction to an agent would lead individuals to overestimate his causal contribution to a harm. However, the extent to which these judgments deviate from criteria of rationality remains unclear. The two present studies aimed at investigating conditions under which this effect occurs. Participants red a vignette in which the evaluative reaction was operat…
Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (1 work) · Blame (1 work) · Causal model (1 work) · Cognitive psychology (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Counterfactual conditional (1 work) · Counterfactual thinking (1 work) · Econometrics (1 work)