Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Masashi Takeshita

Biographic Data

ID9637106
NAMEMasashi Takeshita
GIVEN NAMESMasashi
FAMILY NAMETakeshita
SIGNATURETAKESHITA M
AFFILIATIONSHokkaido University
ORCID0000-0001-5853-3262
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS2
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR2
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX0
  • Philosophical Significance of Artificial Intuitions

    Open Access•Kiichi Inarimori, Masashi Takeshita et al.•ARTICLE•Erkenntnis•2026

    This paper explores the ways in which large language models (LLMs) can be used in experimental philosophy. LLMs can be used in different ways for different purposes in experimental philosophy. Among others, we focus on what we call “Non-Predictive Research”, in which LLMs’ “intuitive” responses to thought experiment cases are not expected to be predictive of, or analogous to, human subjects’ intuitive responses to them. In effect, Non-Predictive …

  • What should philosophers do with “deceptive” intuition pumps? Restrictionism vs reformism

    Arata Matsuda, Masashi Takeshita•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2026

    Philosophers commonly use thought experiments to elicit intuitions that serve as evidence for or against philosophical theories. Daniel Dennett calls such thought experiments “intuition pumps” and expresses concern that some of them are “deceptive” in that they elicit conflicting intuitions and thus lead to conflicting conclusions. What, then, should philosophers do with “deceptive” intuition pumps? Dennett proposes what might be called restricti…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Philosophical Significance of Artificial Intuitions

    Open Access•Kiichi Inarimori, Masashi Takeshita et al.•ARTICLE•Erkenntnis•2026

    This paper explores the ways in which large language models (LLMs) can be used in experimental philosophy. LLMs can be used in different ways for different purposes in experimental philosophy. Among others, we focus on what we call “Non-Predictive Research”, in which LLMs’ “intuitive” responses to thought experiment cases are not expected to be predictive of, or analogous to, human subjects’ intuitive responses to them. In effect, Non-Predictive …

  • What should philosophers do with “deceptive” intuition pumps? Restrictionism vs reformism

    Arata Matsuda, Masashi Takeshita•ARTICLE•Philosophical Psychology•2026

    Philosophers commonly use thought experiments to elicit intuitions that serve as evidence for or against philosophical theories. Daniel Dennett calls such thought experiments “intuition pumps” and expresses concern that some of them are “deceptive” in that they elicit conflicting intuitions and thus lead to conflicting conclusions. What, then, should philosophers do with “deceptive” intuition pumps? Dennett proposes what might be called restricti…

Cognitive science (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (1 work) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Intuition (1 work) · Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae