Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski
Biographic Data
| ID | 9637634 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski |
| GIVEN NAMES | Stanisław |
| FAMILY NAME | Goźdź-Roszkowski |
| SIGNATURE | GOŹDŹ-ROSZKOWSKI S |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Lodz |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4323-8647 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Legal Language
It is generally acknowledged that law does not exist without language. Legal rules and regulations are coded in language. Legal concepts and legal processes are accessible only through language. If a legal text is criticized for being abstruse and incomprehensible to the general public, the problem most probably lies with the language.
English for Law
This encyclopedic entry offers an interdisciplinary overview of English for Law as a dynamic and evolving subfield of English for Specific Purposes (ESP). It traces the historical development of legal English, emphasizing the enduring influence of Latin and French, and examines its structural and rhetorical features as shaped by different legal traditions, notably common law and civil law. The entry distinguishes between register‐ and genre‐based…
The status of generic structure in expert opinions. Insights from a comparative analysis of American, Russian and Bulgarian documents
This paper attempts to describe expert opinions from a comparative and genre-based perspective. It addresses the central question of whether expert opinions follow any specific rhetorical and organizational patterns and the extent to which these may have been imposed by the respective judicial institutions in Russia, Bulgaria and the USA. After reviewing the institutional contexts and constraints imposed on experts and their opinions, the analysi…
Corpus Linguistics in Legal Discourse
There are many different ways in which modern Corpus Linguistics can be used to enrich and broaden our understanding of legal discourse. Based on the central principle of co-occurrence and co-selection in language construction, this paper reviews current applications of Corpus Linguistics in the area of legal discourse focusing on issues ranging from phraseology, variation in legal discourse, legal translation, register and genre perspectives on …
Move Analysis of Legal Justifications in Constitutional Tribunal Judgments in Poland
It appears that we know surprisingly little about how judges frame linguistically the rationale behind their decisions and how such texts are structured. Using the concept of rhetorical moves (Swales in Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990; Bhatia in Analyzing genre-language use in professional settings, Longman, London, 1993, Worlds of written discourse. A genre-based view, Contin…
Communicating Dissent in Judicial Opinions
To date, there has been surprisingly little research on separate opinions in legal linguistics literature. Scarce attention has been paid to the linguistic and communicative aspects of how judges frame their disagreements. This paper serves as one of the early attempts to examine the institution of votum separatum , or separate opinion, from a comparative, cross-language perspective using a linguistic methodology. The evidence indicates a clear s…
Legal Phraseology Today
Phraseology is now taking centre stage in a wide range of fields. However, there are still relatively few empirical studies of word combinations in the domain of law and in the many different contexts where legal discourse is used. This recent explosion of interest has undoubtedly been sparked off by the development of corpus linguistics research and this special issue presents some of the latest developments in the study of this linguistic pheno…
No prominent works on this page.
Legal Phraseology Today
Phraseology is now taking centre stage in a wide range of fields. However, there are still relatively few empirical studies of word combinations in the domain of law and in the many different contexts where legal discourse is used. This recent explosion of interest has undoubtedly been sparked off by the development of corpus linguistics research and this special issue presents some of the latest developments in the study of this linguistic pheno…
Move Analysis of Legal Justifications in Constitutional Tribunal Judgments in Poland
It appears that we know surprisingly little about how judges frame linguistically the rationale behind their decisions and how such texts are structured. Using the concept of rhetorical moves (Swales in Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990; Bhatia in Analyzing genre-language use in professional settings, Longman, London, 1993, Worlds of written discourse. A genre-based view, Contin…
Communicating Dissent in Judicial Opinions
To date, there has been surprisingly little research on separate opinions in legal linguistics literature. Scarce attention has been paid to the linguistic and communicative aspects of how judges frame their disagreements. This paper serves as one of the early attempts to examine the institution of votum separatum , or separate opinion, from a comparative, cross-language perspective using a linguistic methodology. The evidence indicates a clear s…
Corpus Linguistics in Legal Discourse
There are many different ways in which modern Corpus Linguistics can be used to enrich and broaden our understanding of legal discourse. Based on the central principle of co-occurrence and co-selection in language construction, this paper reviews current applications of Corpus Linguistics in the area of legal discourse focusing on issues ranging from phraseology, variation in legal discourse, legal translation, register and genre perspectives on …
The status of generic structure in expert opinions. Insights from a comparative analysis of American, Russian and Bulgarian documents
This paper attempts to describe expert opinions from a comparative and genre-based perspective. It addresses the central question of whether expert opinions follow any specific rhetorical and organizational patterns and the extent to which these may have been imposed by the respective judicial institutions in Russia, Bulgaria and the USA. After reviewing the institutional contexts and constraints imposed on experts and their opinions, the analysi…
Legal Language
It is generally acknowledged that law does not exist without language. Legal rules and regulations are coded in language. Legal concepts and legal processes are accessible only through language. If a legal text is criticized for being abstruse and incomprehensible to the general public, the problem most probably lies with the language.
English for Law
This encyclopedic entry offers an interdisciplinary overview of English for Law as a dynamic and evolving subfield of English for Specific Purposes (ESP). It traces the historical development of legal English, emphasizing the enduring influence of Latin and French, and examines its structural and rhetorical features as shaped by different legal traditions, notably common law and civil law. The entry distinguishes between register‐ and genre‐based…
Computer Science (6 works) · Linguistics (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 works) · Legal Language and Interpretation (3 works) · linguistics and terminology studies (3 works) · Phraseology (3 works)