Daria Niedziałkowska
Biographic Data
| ID | 9642044 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Daria Niedziałkowska |
| GIVEN NAMES | Daria |
| FAMILY NAME | Niedziałkowska |
| SIGNATURE | NIEDZIAŁKOWSKA D |
| AFFILIATIONS | Institute of Psychology |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5549-5739 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
The importance of truth
Source memory for truth is usually better than for falsity, and similar effects are observed for important compared with unimportant information. A recently found interaction between information veracity and importance indicates that people effectively prioritize encoding true information (but not false). Yet it is unclear whether the feedback about veracity and importance of the information is integrated into joint memory representation. In the …
Representation of shared surface information and false memory for abstract versus concrete pictures in the conjoint recognition paradigm
An effective factor by which false memories can arise is relatedness which includes not only semantic associations but also perceptual resemblance. This issue raises questions about how patterns of perceptual features are represented in memory and how they relate to semantic representations. In five experiments, we investigated the memory processes underlying the false recognition of perceptually or semantically related pictures from the perspect…
Recollection of “true” feedback is better than “false” feedback independently of a priori beliefs
The processes underlying memory for truth and falsity have been explored and discussed in experimental psychology for over thirty years now. Psychologists have often referred to the Spinozan and Cartesian models about truth-value information "tagging" but, so far, experimental results have been inconsistent. This paper investigates memory for truth and falsity from the new perspective of the dual-recollection theory. We conducted two experiments …
No prominent works on this page.
Recollection of “true” feedback is better than “false” feedback independently of a priori beliefs
The processes underlying memory for truth and falsity have been explored and discussed in experimental psychology for over thirty years now. Psychologists have often referred to the Spinozan and Cartesian models about truth-value information "tagging" but, so far, experimental results have been inconsistent. This paper investigates memory for truth and falsity from the new perspective of the dual-recollection theory. We conducted two experiments …
Representation of shared surface information and false memory for abstract versus concrete pictures in the conjoint recognition paradigm
An effective factor by which false memories can arise is relatedness which includes not only semantic associations but also perceptual resemblance. This issue raises questions about how patterns of perceptual features are represented in memory and how they relate to semantic representations. In five experiments, we investigated the memory processes underlying the false recognition of perceptually or semantically related pictures from the perspect…
The importance of truth
Source memory for truth is usually better than for falsity, and similar effects are observed for important compared with unimportant information. A recently found interaction between information veracity and importance indicates that people effectively prioritize encoding true information (but not false). Yet it is unclear whether the feedback about veracity and importance of the information is integrated into joint memory representation. In the …
Cognitive psychology (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Memory Processes and Influences (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Artificial Intelligence (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · False Memory (2 works) · Falsity (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works) · Recall (2 works)