Peter Houtlosser
Biographic Data
| ID | 96747 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Peter Houtlosser |
| GIVEN NAMES | Peter |
| FAMILY NAME | Houtlosser |
| SIGNATURE | HOUTLOSSER P |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Amsterdam |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 21 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 2 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1999 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The Rhetoric of William the Silent’s Apologie a Dialectical Perspective
Dialectic and Rhetoric
Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves
The study of argumentation as normative pragmatics
In the study of argumentation there is a sharp and ideological separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches, which needs to be remedied. The authors show how the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation can be instrumental in bridging the gap. By adopting a research programme that involves engaging in ‘normative pragmatics’, not only the critical normative and the empirical descriptive dimensions of the study of argumentation can be…
Argumentative Indicators in Discourse
Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse
This article reacts against the undesirable ideological separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches to argumentative discourse. It argues that a sound evaluation of argumentation requires an analysis that reveals all aspects of the discourse pertinent to critical testing. To explain the rationale of the various moves made in the discourse and the strategic patterns behind them, not only the interlocutors' dialectical goals must be ta…
Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse
This article reacts against the undesirable ideological separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches to argumentative discourse. It argues that a sound evaluation of argumentation requires an analysis that reveals all aspects of the discourse pertinent to critical testing. To explain the rationale of the various moves made in the discourse and the strategic patterns behind them, not only the interlocutors' dialectical goals must be ta…
Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves
Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse
This article reacts against the undesirable ideological separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches to argumentative discourse. It argues that a sound evaluation of argumentation requires an analysis that reveals all aspects of the discourse pertinent to critical testing. To explain the rationale of the various moves made in the discourse and the strategic patterns behind them, not only the interlocutors' dialectical goals must be ta…
The study of argumentation as normative pragmatics
In the study of argumentation there is a sharp and ideological separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches, which needs to be remedied. The authors show how the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation can be instrumental in bridging the gap. By adopting a research programme that involves engaging in ‘normative pragmatics’, not only the critical normative and the empirical descriptive dimensions of the study of argumentation can be…
Argumentative Indicators in Discourse
Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves
Dialectic and Rhetoric
The Rhetoric of William the Silent’s Apologie a Dialectical Perspective
Argumentative (6 works) · Dialectic (6 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Linguistics (5 works) · Rhetorical question (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Argumentation theory (3 works) · Rhetoric (3 works) · Art (2 works)