Armando Boito
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 972136 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Armando Boito |
| NOMBRES | Armando |
| APELLIDO | Boito |
| FIRMA | BOITO A |
| AFILIACIONES | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
| VERIFICADO | No |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 16 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 71 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 16 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 1994 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 5 |
Commentary on Robinson’s Text
State, Politics, and Social Classes
Os conflitos de classe na recente história política do Brasil
The article examines the Brazilian political process from 1994 to 2022. His most general thesis is that this process, in the current economic and social conditions, is the result of the conflict between classes and class fractions active in Brazilian politics. It also considers, in the analysis of this political process, the feminist, black and LGBT movements as well as the strong conservative reaction that these movements gave rise to. It examin…
The Rise of Fascism in Brazil
Analysis of Brazil's Bolsonaro administration, its most active social support base, and the political crisis that gave rise to it shows that, operating with a concept of fascism embedded in the Marxist tradition, it can be characterized as (neo)fascist. The political crisis of 2015-2018 that led to it involved a crisis of hegemony of the bloc in power, the crisis of party representation of the dominant classes, political activism by the state bur…
Lulism, Populism, and Bonapartism
Lulism is one of the most important political phenomena of twenty-first-century Brazil. It can be compared to the Varguism that dominated Brazilian politics between 1930 and 1964 in its broad popular but politically unorganized base and its policy of state intervention in the economy to stimulate economic growth, increase the state's room for maneuver against the imperialist countries, and promote a moderate income distribution. These two variant…
State, State Institutions, and Political Power in Brazil
The political conflicts during the Workers' Party administrations led by Luís Inácio Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff have been driven by disputes between two fractions of the country's bourgeoisie: the internal and the internationalized bourgeoisie. Their ideologies, policies, institutions, and forms of political representation have determined government policies and outcomes. These processes have unfolded within an authoritarian democracy whose…
La nouvelle phase du syndicalisme brésilien (2003-2013)
L’article examine le syndicalisme brésilien pendant les gouvernements successifs du Parti des travailleurs (PT), entre 2003 et 2013. Nous soutenons que les nouvelles conditions économiques et politiques créées par ces gouvernements et leur politique néodéveloppementiste ont favorisé la lutte revendicative des travailleurs, donné lieu à une forte augmentation du nombre de grèves et permis l’obtention de meilleurs salaires et d’avantages sociaux. N…
Social Classes, Neodevelopmentalism, and Brazilian Foreign Policy under Presidents Lula and Dilma
The transition from the FHC to the Lula administration produced an epochal change within the power bloc. Large-scale international financial capital lost power, while the internal grande bourgeoisie ascended politically because of a policy-oriented broad-front approach that included even the popular classes. The Lula and Dilma governments did not break with the neoliberal model for capitalism, but because they represented a particular fraction of…
Testimonials
Decline in Unionism
There was much discussion in the 1980s and 1990s about the crisis in the union movement in Brazil, and some writers even began to talk of its historic decline. An analysis of union activity in Brazil from 2000 to 2009-how many strikes took place, how many strikers were involved, whether their objectives were defensive or offensive, how such conflicts were conducted, the extent of each, and, perhaps most important, what the workers thought they we…
Marx in Brazil
Luttes sociales et perspectives politiques en Amérique latine
Estado e burguesia no capitalismo neoliberal
O artigo é fruto de pesquisa ainda em curso e procura fazer um tipo de análise que foi, em grande medida, deixado de lado no Brasil. Reatando com uma rica tradição da Sociologia e da Ciência Política brasileiras, que se formou nos anos 1960 e 1970, o autor tenta examinar os interesses das frações da burguesia brasileira que chegam a agir como frações distintas no processo político nacional, bem como as relações desses interesses com a política de…
Class Relations in Brazil's New Neoliberal Phase
While maintaining the neoliberal capitalist model, the Lula administration has ushered it into a new phase. With respect to the bloc in power, national and international financial capital today shares its hegemony with the important domestic industrial and agrarian bourgeoisie. However, with respect to the working class, there have been two changes. First, the new unionist elite that has been moving toward a micro-corporativism since the mid-1990…
Neoliberal Hegemony and Unionism in Brazil
The neoliberal governments of Fernando Collor de Melo and Fernando Henrique Cardoso came to power in Brazil by popular vote. In these two elections the power of money and of the media were certainly very important, but it would be wrong to attribute the victories of the neoliberal candidates in 1989 and in 1994 just to the manipulation of the electoral process. They are in fact an indication that we are involved in a process-broader and more comp…
The State and Trade Unionism in Brazil
State intervention in the organization of the Brazilian trade union movement dates from the 1930s. Immediately following the revolution of October 1930 that brought Getuilio Vargas to power, the provisional government created the Ministry of Labor, Industry, and Commerce, and four months later, on March 19, 1931, it issued the first unionization law, requiring unions to register with the ministry and imposing a series of limitations on their orga…
Estado e burguesia no capitalismo neoliberal
O artigo é fruto de pesquisa ainda em curso e procura fazer um tipo de análise que foi, em grande medida, deixado de lado no Brasil. Reatando com uma rica tradição da Sociologia e da Ciência Política brasileiras, que se formou nos anos 1960 e 1970, o autor tenta examinar os interesses das frações da burguesia brasileira que chegam a agir como frações distintas no processo político nacional, bem como as relações desses interesses com a política de…
State, State Institutions, and Political Power in Brazil
The political conflicts during the Workers' Party administrations led by Luís Inácio Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff have been driven by disputes between two fractions of the country's bourgeoisie: the internal and the internationalized bourgeoisie. Their ideologies, policies, institutions, and forms of political representation have determined government policies and outcomes. These processes have unfolded within an authoritarian democracy whose…
Social Classes, Neodevelopmentalism, and Brazilian Foreign Policy under Presidents Lula and Dilma
The transition from the FHC to the Lula administration produced an epochal change within the power bloc. Large-scale international financial capital lost power, while the internal grande bourgeoisie ascended politically because of a policy-oriented broad-front approach that included even the popular classes. The Lula and Dilma governments did not break with the neoliberal model for capitalism, but because they represented a particular fraction of…
Class Relations in Brazil's New Neoliberal Phase
While maintaining the neoliberal capitalist model, the Lula administration has ushered it into a new phase. With respect to the bloc in power, national and international financial capital today shares its hegemony with the important domestic industrial and agrarian bourgeoisie. However, with respect to the working class, there have been two changes. First, the new unionist elite that has been moving toward a micro-corporativism since the mid-1990…
Decline in Unionism
There was much discussion in the 1980s and 1990s about the crisis in the union movement in Brazil, and some writers even began to talk of its historic decline. An analysis of union activity in Brazil from 2000 to 2009-how many strikes took place, how many strikers were involved, whether their objectives were defensive or offensive, how such conflicts were conducted, the extent of each, and, perhaps most important, what the workers thought they we…
The State and Trade Unionism in Brazil
State intervention in the organization of the Brazilian trade union movement dates from the 1930s. Immediately following the revolution of October 1930 that brought Getuilio Vargas to power, the provisional government created the Ministry of Labor, Industry, and Commerce, and four months later, on March 19, 1931, it issued the first unionization law, requiring unions to register with the ministry and imposing a series of limitations on their orga…
La nouvelle phase du syndicalisme brésilien (2003-2013)
L’article examine le syndicalisme brésilien pendant les gouvernements successifs du Parti des travailleurs (PT), entre 2003 et 2013. Nous soutenons que les nouvelles conditions économiques et politiques créées par ces gouvernements et leur politique néodéveloppementiste ont favorisé la lutte revendicative des travailleurs, donné lieu à une forte augmentation du nombre de grèves et permis l’obtention de meilleurs salaires et d’avantages sociaux. N…
Neoliberal Hegemony and Unionism in Brazil
The neoliberal governments of Fernando Collor de Melo and Fernando Henrique Cardoso came to power in Brazil by popular vote. In these two elections the power of money and of the media were certainly very important, but it would be wrong to attribute the victories of the neoliberal candidates in 1989 and in 1994 just to the manipulation of the electoral process. They are in fact an indication that we are involved in a process-broader and more comp…
Lulism, Populism, and Bonapartism
Lulism is one of the most important political phenomena of twenty-first-century Brazil. It can be compared to the Varguism that dominated Brazilian politics between 1930 and 1964 in its broad popular but politically unorganized base and its policy of state intervention in the economy to stimulate economic growth, increase the state's room for maneuver against the imperialist countries, and promote a moderate income distribution. These two variant…
Marx in Brazil
Luttes sociales et perspectives politiques en Amérique latine
The State and Trade Unionism in Brazil
State intervention in the organization of the Brazilian trade union movement dates from the 1930s. Immediately following the revolution of October 1930 that brought Getuilio Vargas to power, the provisional government created the Ministry of Labor, Industry, and Commerce, and four months later, on March 19, 1931, it issued the first unionization law, requiring unions to register with the ministry and imposing a series of limitations on their orga…
Neoliberal Hegemony and Unionism in Brazil
The neoliberal governments of Fernando Collor de Melo and Fernando Henrique Cardoso came to power in Brazil by popular vote. In these two elections the power of money and of the media were certainly very important, but it would be wrong to attribute the victories of the neoliberal candidates in 1989 and in 1994 just to the manipulation of the electoral process. They are in fact an indication that we are involved in a process-broader and more comp…
Luttes sociales et perspectives politiques en Amérique latine
Estado e burguesia no capitalismo neoliberal
O artigo é fruto de pesquisa ainda em curso e procura fazer um tipo de análise que foi, em grande medida, deixado de lado no Brasil. Reatando com uma rica tradição da Sociologia e da Ciência Política brasileiras, que se formou nos anos 1960 e 1970, o autor tenta examinar os interesses das frações da burguesia brasileira que chegam a agir como frações distintas no processo político nacional, bem como as relações desses interesses com a política de…
Class Relations in Brazil's New Neoliberal Phase
While maintaining the neoliberal capitalist model, the Lula administration has ushered it into a new phase. With respect to the bloc in power, national and international financial capital today shares its hegemony with the important domestic industrial and agrarian bourgeoisie. However, with respect to the working class, there have been two changes. First, the new unionist elite that has been moving toward a micro-corporativism since the mid-1990…
Marx in Brazil
Decline in Unionism
There was much discussion in the 1980s and 1990s about the crisis in the union movement in Brazil, and some writers even began to talk of its historic decline. An analysis of union activity in Brazil from 2000 to 2009-how many strikes took place, how many strikers were involved, whether their objectives were defensive or offensive, how such conflicts were conducted, the extent of each, and, perhaps most important, what the workers thought they we…
Testimonials
Social Classes, Neodevelopmentalism, and Brazilian Foreign Policy under Presidents Lula and Dilma
The transition from the FHC to the Lula administration produced an epochal change within the power bloc. Large-scale international financial capital lost power, while the internal grande bourgeoisie ascended politically because of a policy-oriented broad-front approach that included even the popular classes. The Lula and Dilma governments did not break with the neoliberal model for capitalism, but because they represented a particular fraction of…
La nouvelle phase du syndicalisme brésilien (2003-2013)
L’article examine le syndicalisme brésilien pendant les gouvernements successifs du Parti des travailleurs (PT), entre 2003 et 2013. Nous soutenons que les nouvelles conditions économiques et politiques créées par ces gouvernements et leur politique néodéveloppementiste ont favorisé la lutte revendicative des travailleurs, donné lieu à une forte augmentation du nombre de grèves et permis l’obtention de meilleurs salaires et d’avantages sociaux. N…
State, State Institutions, and Political Power in Brazil
The political conflicts during the Workers' Party administrations led by Luís Inácio Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff have been driven by disputes between two fractions of the country's bourgeoisie: the internal and the internationalized bourgeoisie. Their ideologies, policies, institutions, and forms of political representation have determined government policies and outcomes. These processes have unfolded within an authoritarian democracy whose…
Lulism, Populism, and Bonapartism
Lulism is one of the most important political phenomena of twenty-first-century Brazil. It can be compared to the Varguism that dominated Brazilian politics between 1930 and 1964 in its broad popular but politically unorganized base and its policy of state intervention in the economy to stimulate economic growth, increase the state's room for maneuver against the imperialist countries, and promote a moderate income distribution. These two variant…
State, Politics, and Social Classes
Os conflitos de classe na recente história política do Brasil
The article examines the Brazilian political process from 1994 to 2022. His most general thesis is that this process, in the current economic and social conditions, is the result of the conflict between classes and class fractions active in Brazilian politics. It also considers, in the analysis of this political process, the feminist, black and LGBT movements as well as the strong conservative reaction that these movements gave rise to. It examin…
The Rise of Fascism in Brazil
Analysis of Brazil's Bolsonaro administration, its most active social support base, and the political crisis that gave rise to it shows that, operating with a concept of fascism embedded in the Marxist tradition, it can be characterized as (neo)fascist. The political crisis of 2015-2018 that led to it involved a crisis of hegemony of the bloc in power, the crisis of party representation of the dominant classes, political activism by the state bur…
Commentary on Robinson’s Text
Political science (14 obras) · Law (9 obras) · Political economy (9 obras) · Politics (9 obras) · Sociology (8 obras) · Economics (6 obras) · Social and Economic Solidarity (6 obras) · Social and Political Issues (6 obras) · Humanities (5 obras) · Philosophy (4 obras)