Govorukhina Yuliya А
Biographic Data
| ID | 9789668 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Govorukhina Yuliya А |
| GIVEN NAMES | Govorukhina |
| FAMILY NAME | Yuliya А |
| SIGNATURE | А G Y |
| AFFILIATIONS | Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2675-5909 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
“Where is the author and where does he speak from?”
The article proposes a phenomenological answer to the question asked by M. Stepanova in the collection of essays “One, not one, not me”: “Where is the author himself, and where does he speak from?”. The material of the collection allows us to reconstruct the logic and process of Stepanova’s ‘author searching’. As methodological tools the concepts of M. Heidegger, H.G. Gadamer, P. Ricoeur are used. Essays perform as the work of the interpretive me…
The Funeral of N. Kononov’s Novel by Literary Critique (About the Reception of “The Funeral of a Grasshopper”)
The article is devoted to the problem of production of the book value, faith in its value, carried out by literary critique as an Institute of the literary field. The material is the critical reception of Nikolai Kononov’s novel “The Funeral of a grasshopper”. Published in 2000, the novel gets the small Apollon Grigoriev’s Award (not the big one) and is included in a short list of The Russian Booker Prize, but does not win. The aim of the researc…
The Modern Literary Process in China in the Works of Russian Literary Scholars-Sinologists
Contemporary Chinese literature is actively studied by Russian literary critics, whose view of a foreign cultural text inevitably differs from that of their Chinese colleagues. As a result, on the one hand, new original interpretations appear, and on the other, certain gaps, “blind spots” (Paul de Man) of perception of Chinese literature become obvious. The purpose of the article is to describe the perspective of the vision of Chinese literature,…
Semiotics of Literary Critical Activity
The crisis of literary criticism occurred in the 1990s and forced critics to rethink their status, the way they talk about the text, and communication with the reader. Literary criticism theoretically comprehends changes in the structure of literary-critical activity. Promising, in our opinion, is the semiotic perspective of the study of criticism, which allows us to cover both the mechanism of functioning of this phenomenon and its ideological c…
No prominent works on this page.
Semiotics of Literary Critical Activity
The crisis of literary criticism occurred in the 1990s and forced critics to rethink their status, the way they talk about the text, and communication with the reader. Literary criticism theoretically comprehends changes in the structure of literary-critical activity. Promising, in our opinion, is the semiotic perspective of the study of criticism, which allows us to cover both the mechanism of functioning of this phenomenon and its ideological c…
The Modern Literary Process in China in the Works of Russian Literary Scholars-Sinologists
Contemporary Chinese literature is actively studied by Russian literary critics, whose view of a foreign cultural text inevitably differs from that of their Chinese colleagues. As a result, on the one hand, new original interpretations appear, and on the other, certain gaps, “blind spots” (Paul de Man) of perception of Chinese literature become obvious. The purpose of the article is to describe the perspective of the vision of Chinese literature,…
The Funeral of N. Kononov’s Novel by Literary Critique (About the Reception of “The Funeral of a Grasshopper”)
The article is devoted to the problem of production of the book value, faith in its value, carried out by literary critique as an Institute of the literary field. The material is the critical reception of Nikolai Kononov’s novel “The Funeral of a grasshopper”. Published in 2000, the novel gets the small Apollon Grigoriev’s Award (not the big one) and is included in a short list of The Russian Booker Prize, but does not win. The aim of the researc…
“Where is the author and where does he speak from?”
The article proposes a phenomenological answer to the question asked by M. Stepanova in the collection of essays “One, not one, not me”: “Where is the author himself, and where does he speak from?”. The material of the collection allows us to reconstruct the logic and process of Stepanova’s ‘author searching’. As methodological tools the concepts of M. Heidegger, H.G. Gadamer, P. Ricoeur are used. Essays perform as the work of the interpretive me…
Philosophy (4 works) · Art (3 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Aesthetics (2 works) · Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication (2 works) · Linguistics (2 works) · Literary criticism (2 works) · Literature (2 works) · China (1 work)