Barnaul Orthodox Seminary
Biographic Data
| ID | 9790595 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Barnaul Orthodox Seminary |
| GIVEN NAMES | Barnaul Orthodox |
| FAMILY NAME | Seminary |
| SIGNATURE | SEMINARY B O |
| AFFILIATIONS | Barnaul Law Institute of the Russian Interior Ministry |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
On the Fiscus of Justinian
In the historiography of the Early Byzantium, the concept of “an Emperor’s fiscus” mismatches with the late ancient original. The fiscus was not a synonym for the state treasury, but it was simultaneously the funds for public purposes and private and personal resources. Emperors supported this ambiguous legal nature of fiscus, implying some specific targets of their policy. The balance varying between them between public and non-public constituen…
Financial Policy of Tiberius Constantinus the Augustus
Introduction. The historical sources did not give the detail description of all the policies of the Byzantine government in the rule of Tiberius Constantinus the August (578–582). Modern historiography usually follows their data without attracting of opportunities, which could be offered by the interdisciplinary methods. As a result, the full-length picture of the reign of Tiberius II has not been made yet. This statement is correct regarding dif…
No prominent works on this page.
Financial Policy of Tiberius Constantinus the Augustus
Introduction. The historical sources did not give the detail description of all the policies of the Byzantine government in the rule of Tiberius Constantinus the August (578–582). Modern historiography usually follows their data without attracting of opportunities, which could be offered by the interdisciplinary methods. As a result, the full-length picture of the reign of Tiberius II has not been made yet. This statement is correct regarding dif…
On the Fiscus of Justinian
In the historiography of the Early Byzantium, the concept of “an Emperor’s fiscus” mismatches with the late ancient original. The fiscus was not a synonym for the state treasury, but it was simultaneously the funds for public purposes and private and personal resources. Emperors supported this ambiguous legal nature of fiscus, implying some specific targets of their policy. The balance varying between them between public and non-public constituen…
Ancient history (2 works) · Byzantine Studies and History (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Emperor (2 works) · History (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Archaeology (1 work) · Economics (1 work) · Empire (1 work)