Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Leah S Marcus

Biographic Data

ID983694
NAMELeah S Marcus
GIVEN NAMESLeah S
FAMILY NAMEMarcus
SIGNATUREMARCUS L S
AFFILIATIONSVanderbilt University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT7
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1969
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
H-INDEX0
  • How Shakespeare Put Politics on the Stage: Power and Succession in the History Plays

    Open Access•Leah S Marcus•ARTICLE•Renaissance Quarterly•2018

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Why the ‘Pathetic Fallacy’ Isn’t One: Early Modern Vitalism and the Emotions of Nature in Shakespeare and Milton

    Open Access•Leah S Marcus•ARTICLE•Australian Literary Studies•2015

    This essay explores possible connections between modern scientific investigation of nature and the portrayal of affective communities in King Lear and Paradise Lost

  • Shakespearean Editing and Why It Matters

    Open Access•Leah S Marcus•ARTICLE•Literature Compass•2005•References: 1

    A generation ago, many Shakespearean scholars simply accepted the versions of the play that they were provided with by editors. So long as the label was right – Arden, Oxford, Cambridge, Penguin, Riverside, Pelican – the content was assumed to be reliable. But editing can never be transparent – it is always influenced by the cultural assumptions of the editor and his or her era, however submerged those assumptions may be in terms of the editor's …

  • The Cambridge Companion to English Literature, 1500–1600

    Open Access•Colin Burrow, Clark Hulse et al.•BOOK•The Cambridge companion to…•1999

    This is the first comprehensive account of English Renaissance literature in the context of the culture which shaped it: the courts of Henry VIII and Elizabeth I, the tumult of Catholic and Protestant alliances during the Reformation, the age of printing and of New World discovery. In this century courtly literature under Henry VIII moves toward a new, more personal poetry of sentiment, narrative and romance. The development of English prose is s…

  • Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Milton

    Leah S Marcus, Dale Churchward•ARTICLE•Renaissance and Reformation•1999

    78 / Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Réforme Montaigne chercherait à combler un manque: 1) amorce du projet des Essais, (surtout) l'ami perdu; 2) pendant l'écriture, la connaissance de soi.Rétif au cloisonnement, Montaigne vagabonde/écrit en dépit des genres et unités érigés de nouveau par les néo-aristotéliciens.Son style coupé, sautillant comme celui de l'Arioste (p. 159),accompagne une recherche mélancolique de son identité qui év…

  • Alternative Shakespeares. Vol. 2

    Open Access•Douglas Brooks, Douglas A Brooks et al.•ARTICLE•South Central Review•1998

  • The Politics of Mirth: Jonson, Herrick, Milton, Marvell, and the Defense of Old Holiday Pastimes

    Leah S Marcus, James E Neufeld•ARTICLE•Renaissance and Reformation•1969

    Leah Marcus's The Politics of Mirth: Jonson, Herrick, Milton, Marvell, and the Defense of Old Holiday Pastimes is a fascinating study of why James and Charles promoted some types of rural sport and festival and of how certain literary texts participated in promoting or critiquing royal policy. . . . Marcus provocatively links texts not often studied in conjunction with one another, and she provides strong and detailed readings of those texts.-Jea…

No prominent works on this page.

  • The Politics of Mirth: Jonson, Herrick, Milton, Marvell, and the Defense of Old Holiday Pastimes

    Leah S Marcus, James E Neufeld•ARTICLE•Renaissance and Reformation•1969

    Leah Marcus's The Politics of Mirth: Jonson, Herrick, Milton, Marvell, and the Defense of Old Holiday Pastimes is a fascinating study of why James and Charles promoted some types of rural sport and festival and of how certain literary texts participated in promoting or critiquing royal policy. . . . Marcus provocatively links texts not often studied in conjunction with one another, and she provides strong and detailed readings of those texts.-Jea…

  • Alternative Shakespeares. Vol. 2

    Open Access•Douglas Brooks, Douglas A Brooks et al.•ARTICLE•South Central Review•1998

  • The Cambridge Companion to English Literature, 1500–1600

    Open Access•Colin Burrow, Clark Hulse et al.•BOOK•The Cambridge companion to…•1999

    This is the first comprehensive account of English Renaissance literature in the context of the culture which shaped it: the courts of Henry VIII and Elizabeth I, the tumult of Catholic and Protestant alliances during the Reformation, the age of printing and of New World discovery. In this century courtly literature under Henry VIII moves toward a new, more personal poetry of sentiment, narrative and romance. The development of English prose is s…

  • Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Milton

    Leah S Marcus, Dale Churchward•ARTICLE•Renaissance and Reformation•1999

    78 / Renaissance and Reformation / Renaissance et Réforme Montaigne chercherait à combler un manque: 1) amorce du projet des Essais, (surtout) l'ami perdu; 2) pendant l'écriture, la connaissance de soi.Rétif au cloisonnement, Montaigne vagabonde/écrit en dépit des genres et unités érigés de nouveau par les néo-aristotéliciens.Son style coupé, sautillant comme celui de l'Arioste (p. 159),accompagne une recherche mélancolique de son identité qui év…

  • Shakespearean Editing and Why It Matters

    Open Access•Leah S Marcus•ARTICLE•Literature Compass•2005•References: 1

    A generation ago, many Shakespearean scholars simply accepted the versions of the play that they were provided with by editors. So long as the label was right – Arden, Oxford, Cambridge, Penguin, Riverside, Pelican – the content was assumed to be reliable. But editing can never be transparent – it is always influenced by the cultural assumptions of the editor and his or her era, however submerged those assumptions may be in terms of the editor's …

  • Why the ‘Pathetic Fallacy’ Isn’t One: Early Modern Vitalism and the Emotions of Nature in Shakespeare and Milton

    Open Access•Leah S Marcus•ARTICLE•Australian Literary Studies•2015

    This essay explores possible connections between modern scientific investigation of nature and the portrayal of affective communities in King Lear and Paradise Lost

  • How Shakespeare Put Politics on the Stage: Power and Succession in the History Plays

    Open Access•Leah S Marcus•ARTICLE•Renaissance Quarterly•2018

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

History (5 works) · Art (3 works) · History (3 works) · Literature (3 works) · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 works) · Art history (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Philippine History and Culture (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae