Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jan Smedslund

Biographic Data

ID98880
NAMEJan Smedslund
GIVEN NAMESJan
FAMILY NAMESmedslund
SIGNATURESMEDSLUND J
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Oslo
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS14
TOTAL CITATIONS29
AUTHOR COUNT14
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1969
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
H-INDEX3
  • Why Psychology Cannot be an Empirical Science

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Integrative Psychological and…•2016•Cited by: 18•References: 16

  • Research-Based Knowledge in Psychology

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund, Lee Ro et al.•ARTICLE•Integrative Psychological and…•2014•Cited by: 3•References: 25

  • The bricoleur model of psychological practice

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•2012

    A bricoleur is a resource person enlisted when conventional procedures in daily life fail to work, and who utilizes whatever is at hand in the given situation to effect a solution. The psychologist- cum-bricoleur relies on three sources of knowledge: what we all know about being human because we are human, what we know about some others because we participate in particular shared meaning systems (language and culture), and what we know about uniq…

  • What follows from what we all know about human beings

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•2012

    This is the third part of a trilogy. The first article is a critique of current empirical research and the second presents the bricoleur model of practice. Here, I try to describe parts of what follows from what we all know about being human because we are human. This knowledge may be partly inherited: that is, we may have an inborn disposition to understand other members of our species in certain ways. An axiomatic system consisting of nine axio…

  • Meaning of words and the use of axiomatics in psychological theory

    Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical and…•2011

  • What Kind of Propositions Are Set Forth in Developmental Research? Five Case Studies

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Human Development•2010

    Five studies published in Child Development, and selected without advance knowledge of their contents, were examined with respect to the metatheoretical status of their hypotheses. Although the hypotheses are treated as empirical, many of them are necessarily true and, hence, insensitive to empirical observation. Studies undertaken to test such hypotheses are labeled pseudoempirical. The high incidence of predominantly pseudoempirical studies (fo…

  • Auxiliary versus Theoretical Hypotheses and Ordinary versus Scientific Language

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Human Development•2010

  • The Mismatch between Current Research Methods and the Nature of Psychological Phenomena

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•2009

    Psychological research and practice both start from what we all know about being human because we are human, what we know about each other because we participate in shared meaning systems (language and culture), and what we know about unique individuals. Practitioners rely on these three sources of knowledge, but researchers try to establish a fourth kind by looking for a limited number of general and empirically based regularities. However, this…

  • From Heider to Psycho-Logic

    Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 17

    Fritz Heider pointed out that common-sense psychology contains many analytic propositions. This discovery opened up the possibility that many scientific psychological hypotheses are also analytic and that the ensuing studies are pseudoempirical, that is, they only test the truth of auxiliary hypotheses. This appears to frequently be the case. The reason may be that hypotheses involving semantically related variables are plausible but nonempirical…

  • Social Representations and Psychologic

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Culture & Psychology•1998•Cited by: 5•References: 11

    Some concepts and assumptions in Moscovici's theory of social representations are analyzed from the point of view of psychologic. Psychologic is an explication and systematization of the psychological common sense embedded in ordinary language. It emphasizes preciseness and logical strictness in contrast to Moscovici's reluctance to define his terms. After a brief presentation of psychologic, the following topics are discussed: the concept of soc…

  • The structure of psychological common sense

    Jan Smedslund•BOOK•The structure of psychological…•1997

  • How Shall the Concept of Anger be Defined

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•1993

    Six positions are described on the question of whether psychological concepts can and should be defined. Anger is defined as follows: `P in C at t is angry at Q' = df 'P in C at t believes that at least one person whom P in C at t cares for has, intentionally or through neglect, been treated without respect by Q, and P has not forgiven Q.' The definition belongs to the system of psychologic (PL), in which the other concepts in the definition are …

  • Piaget's Psychology in Practice

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•British Journal of Educational…•1977•Cited by: 2

    S ummary . AS a result of eight years' experience of Piagetian research and subsequent work as a practising psychologist, certain aspects of Piaget's theories are criticised. In particular the existential status of operatory structures, the relation between logicality and understanding, and the representativeness of the tasks are questioned. Piagetian theory is seen as forcing the psychologist to adopt an artificially detached and one‐sidedly cog…

  • Psychological diagnostics

    Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1969

  • Why Psychology Cannot be an Empirical Science

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Integrative Psychological and…•2016•Cited by: 18•References: 16

  • Social Representations and Psychologic

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Culture & Psychology•1998•Cited by: 5•References: 11

    Some concepts and assumptions in Moscovici's theory of social representations are analyzed from the point of view of psychologic. Psychologic is an explication and systematization of the psychological common sense embedded in ordinary language. It emphasizes preciseness and logical strictness in contrast to Moscovici's reluctance to define his terms. After a brief presentation of psychologic, the following topics are discussed: the concept of soc…

  • Research-Based Knowledge in Psychology

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund, Lee Ro et al.•ARTICLE•Integrative Psychological and…•2014•Cited by: 3•References: 25

  • Piaget's Psychology in Practice

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•British Journal of Educational…•1977•Cited by: 2

    S ummary . AS a result of eight years' experience of Piagetian research and subsequent work as a practising psychologist, certain aspects of Piaget's theories are criticised. In particular the existential status of operatory structures, the relation between logicality and understanding, and the representativeness of the tasks are questioned. Piagetian theory is seen as forcing the psychologist to adopt an artificially detached and one‐sidedly cog…

  • From Heider to Psycho-Logic

    Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 17

    Fritz Heider pointed out that common-sense psychology contains many analytic propositions. This discovery opened up the possibility that many scientific psychological hypotheses are also analytic and that the ensuing studies are pseudoempirical, that is, they only test the truth of auxiliary hypotheses. This appears to frequently be the case. The reason may be that hypotheses involving semantically related variables are plausible but nonempirical…

  • Psychological diagnostics

    Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Psychological Bulletin•1969

  • Piaget's Psychology in Practice

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•British Journal of Educational…•1977•Cited by: 2

    S ummary . AS a result of eight years' experience of Piagetian research and subsequent work as a practising psychologist, certain aspects of Piaget's theories are criticised. In particular the existential status of operatory structures, the relation between logicality and understanding, and the representativeness of the tasks are questioned. Piagetian theory is seen as forcing the psychologist to adopt an artificially detached and one‐sidedly cog…

  • How Shall the Concept of Anger be Defined

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•1993

    Six positions are described on the question of whether psychological concepts can and should be defined. Anger is defined as follows: `P in C at t is angry at Q' = df 'P in C at t believes that at least one person whom P in C at t cares for has, intentionally or through neglect, been treated without respect by Q, and P has not forgiven Q.' The definition belongs to the system of psychologic (PL), in which the other concepts in the definition are …

  • The structure of psychological common sense

    Jan Smedslund•BOOK•The structure of psychological…•1997

  • Social Representations and Psychologic

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Culture & Psychology•1998•Cited by: 5•References: 11

    Some concepts and assumptions in Moscovici's theory of social representations are analyzed from the point of view of psychologic. Psychologic is an explication and systematization of the psychological common sense embedded in ordinary language. It emphasizes preciseness and logical strictness in contrast to Moscovici's reluctance to define his terms. After a brief presentation of psychologic, the following topics are discussed: the concept of soc…

  • From Heider to Psycho-Logic

    Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2008•Cited by: 1•References: 17

    Fritz Heider pointed out that common-sense psychology contains many analytic propositions. This discovery opened up the possibility that many scientific psychological hypotheses are also analytic and that the ensuing studies are pseudoempirical, that is, they only test the truth of auxiliary hypotheses. This appears to frequently be the case. The reason may be that hypotheses involving semantically related variables are plausible but nonempirical…

  • The Mismatch between Current Research Methods and the Nature of Psychological Phenomena

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•2009

    Psychological research and practice both start from what we all know about being human because we are human, what we know about each other because we participate in shared meaning systems (language and culture), and what we know about unique individuals. Practitioners rely on these three sources of knowledge, but researchers try to establish a fourth kind by looking for a limited number of general and empirically based regularities. However, this…

  • What Kind of Propositions Are Set Forth in Developmental Research? Five Case Studies

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Human Development•2010

    Five studies published in Child Development, and selected without advance knowledge of their contents, were examined with respect to the metatheoretical status of their hypotheses. Although the hypotheses are treated as empirical, many of them are necessarily true and, hence, insensitive to empirical observation. Studies undertaken to test such hypotheses are labeled pseudoempirical. The high incidence of predominantly pseudoempirical studies (fo…

  • Auxiliary versus Theoretical Hypotheses and Ordinary versus Scientific Language

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Human Development•2010

  • Meaning of words and the use of axiomatics in psychological theory

    Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Journal of Theoretical and…•2011

  • The bricoleur model of psychological practice

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•2012

    A bricoleur is a resource person enlisted when conventional procedures in daily life fail to work, and who utilizes whatever is at hand in the given situation to effect a solution. The psychologist- cum-bricoleur relies on three sources of knowledge: what we all know about being human because we are human, what we know about some others because we participate in particular shared meaning systems (language and culture), and what we know about uniq…

  • What follows from what we all know about human beings

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Theory & Psychology•2012

    This is the third part of a trilogy. The first article is a critique of current empirical research and the second presents the bricoleur model of practice. Here, I try to describe parts of what follows from what we all know about being human because we are human. This knowledge may be partly inherited: that is, we may have an inborn disposition to understand other members of our species in certain ways. An axiomatic system consisting of nine axio…

  • Research-Based Knowledge in Psychology

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund, Lee Ro et al.•ARTICLE•Integrative Psychological and…•2014•Cited by: 3•References: 25

  • Why Psychology Cannot be an Empirical Science

    Open Access•Jan Smedslund•ARTICLE•Integrative Psychological and…•2016•Cited by: 18•References: 16

Psychology (14 works) · Epistemology (11 works) · Social Psychology (8 works) · Cognitive psychology (7 works) · Philosophy (7 works) · Social Representations and Identity (7 works) · Computer Science (6 works) · Cognitive science (4 works) · Child and Animal Learning Development (3 works) · Cultural Differences and Values (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae