T K Dennison
Biographic Data
| ID | 994374 |
|---|---|
| NAME | T K Dennison |
| GIVEN NAMES | T K |
| FAMILY NAME | Dennison |
| SIGNATURE | DENNISON T K |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 15 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2007 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Serfdom and social capital in Bohemia and Russia1
The 'horizontal' social capital generated by networks and communities is widely regarded as inherently antagonistic to 'vertical' hierarchies such as serfdom. This article examines this view using evidence from pre-Emancipation Bohemia and Russia. It finds that serf communes generated a substantial 'social capital' of shared norms, common information, and collective sanctions. But communal social capital was manipulated by village elites who coll…
Did serfdom matter? Russian rural society, 1750-1860
Journal Article Did serfdom matter? Russian rural society, 1750–1860 Get access T. K. Dennison T. K. Dennison Robinson College, Cambridge Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Historical Research, Volume 79, Issue 203, February 2006, Pages 74–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2281.2006.00352.x Published: 13 January 2006
The Invention of the Russian Rural Commune: Haxthausen and the Evidence
In the 1840s the German Romantic August von Haxthausen originated the idea, in a book reporting on his travels through Russia, that collective ownership of land and other assets was integral to the traditional culture of the Russian rural commune. Russian intellectuals accepted this idea and made it the basis for political ideals and social theories (even after 1917, as in the case of Aleksandr Chayanov). The 1861 Emancipation Act had brought col…
Did serfdom matter? Russian rural society, 1750-1860
Journal Article Did serfdom matter? Russian rural society, 1750–1860 Get access T. K. Dennison T. K. Dennison Robinson College, Cambridge Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Historical Research, Volume 79, Issue 203, February 2006, Pages 74–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2281.2006.00352.x Published: 13 January 2006
Serfdom and social capital in Bohemia and Russia1
The 'horizontal' social capital generated by networks and communities is widely regarded as inherently antagonistic to 'vertical' hierarchies such as serfdom. This article examines this view using evidence from pre-Emancipation Bohemia and Russia. It finds that serf communes generated a substantial 'social capital' of shared norms, common information, and collective sanctions. But communal social capital was manipulated by village elites who coll…
The Invention of the Russian Rural Commune: Haxthausen and the Evidence
In the 1840s the German Romantic August von Haxthausen originated the idea, in a book reporting on his travels through Russia, that collective ownership of land and other assets was integral to the traditional culture of the Russian rural commune. Russian intellectuals accepted this idea and made it the basis for political ideals and social theories (even after 1917, as in the case of Aleksandr Chayanov). The 1861 Emancipation Act had brought col…
The Invention of the Russian Rural Commune: Haxthausen and the Evidence
In the 1840s the German Romantic August von Haxthausen originated the idea, in a book reporting on his travels through Russia, that collective ownership of land and other assets was integral to the traditional culture of the Russian rural commune. Russian intellectuals accepted this idea and made it the basis for political ideals and social theories (even after 1917, as in the case of Aleksandr Chayanov). The 1861 Emancipation Act had brought col…
Did serfdom matter? Russian rural society, 1750-1860
Journal Article Did serfdom matter? Russian rural society, 1750–1860 Get access T. K. Dennison T. K. Dennison Robinson College, Cambridge Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Historical Research, Volume 79, Issue 203, February 2006, Pages 74–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2281.2006.00352.x Published: 13 January 2006
Serfdom and social capital in Bohemia and Russia1
The 'horizontal' social capital generated by networks and communities is widely regarded as inherently antagonistic to 'vertical' hierarchies such as serfdom. This article examines this view using evidence from pre-Emancipation Bohemia and Russia. It finds that serf communes generated a substantial 'social capital' of shared norms, common information, and collective sanctions. But communal social capital was manipulated by village elites who coll…
Political science (3 works) · Economics (2 works) · Emancipation (2 works) · Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 works) · History (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Serfdom (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (1 works)