Theodora Scarato
Biographic Data
| ID | 9992831 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Theodora Scarato |
| GIVEN NAMES | Theodora |
| FAMILY NAME | Scarato |
| SIGNATURE | SCARATO T |
| AFFILIATIONS | Wild Sheep Foundation |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Flora and fauna
In the last 60 years, there has been a steady increase in ambient exposures from nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) between 0 and 300 GHz, primarily in the radiofrequency (RF) ranges between 30 kHz and 3 GHz. Each technology has introduced a layer of exposures with different transmission characteristics into the environment, creating what is today a broad scope of complex chronic, low-intensity, ambient exposures known to be biologically ac…
U.S. policy on wireless technologies and public health protection
The current U.S. regulatory framework governing non-ionizing radiofrequency radiation (RFR) used in all wireless technology is outdated and lacks adequate protection, oversight, and enforcement. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was given regulatory jurisdiction by the U.S. Congress in 1996 over RFR exposure standards setting even though FCC has no in-house expertise regarding health or environmental effects from RFR. FCC is a lice…
No prominent works on this page.
Flora and fauna
In the last 60 years, there has been a steady increase in ambient exposures from nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) between 0 and 300 GHz, primarily in the radiofrequency (RF) ranges between 30 kHz and 3 GHz. Each technology has introduced a layer of exposures with different transmission characteristics into the environment, creating what is today a broad scope of complex chronic, low-intensity, ambient exposures known to be biologically ac…
U.S. policy on wireless technologies and public health protection
The current U.S. regulatory framework governing non-ionizing radiofrequency radiation (RFR) used in all wireless technology is outdated and lacks adequate protection, oversight, and enforcement. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) was given regulatory jurisdiction by the U.S. Congress in 1996 over RFR exposure standards setting even though FCC has no in-house expertise regarding health or environmental effects from RFR. FCC is a lice…
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (2 works) · Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (1 work) · Biodiversity (1 work) · Broadband (1 work) · Commission (1 work) · Ecosystem (1 work) · Electromagnetic spectrum (1 work) · Human health (1 work) · Jurisdiction (1 work) · Legislation (1 work)