Joel B Grossman
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 1004432 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Joel B Grossman |
| PRENOMES | Joel B |
| SOBRENOME | Grossman |
| ASSINATURA | GROSSMAN J B |
| AFILIAÇÕES | University of Wisconsin–Madison |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 31 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 190 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 31 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1961 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2015 |
| ÍNDICE H | 7 |
Judicial Review
Constitutionalizing Modernity
Who makes decisions when an essential, constitutional 'handbook' has failed to describe any exceptional situation? Is it fair to place power in the hands of a few specific people to decide? This article illustrates how the US Supreme Court has modernized and reconstituted the US Constitution to make it compatible with an emerging twentieth-century regulatory state and the attendant public functions within the 'state'. The article examines the rel…
Do the "Haves" Still Come Out Ahead
In the spring of 1998, the University of Wisconsin Law School sponsored a multidisciplinary conference to assess the impact of perhaps the most visible, widely cited, and influential article ever published in the law and society field: Marc Galanter's (1974) "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change." In that article Galanter attempts to explain the outcome of trial court litigation in essentially structural term…
Ronald J. Fiscus
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Bork's Law and the Closing of the Judicial Mind
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Bork's Law and The Closing of the Judicial Mind
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
The Supreme Court's Third Century
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
The Supreme Court's Third Century
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policymaker
The most frequent explanations for the endurance of the Supreme Court's policies and of its power as a national policymaker assume public reverence for the Court, widespread support for it as an institution, or broad‐based agreement with its policies. Public opinion studies refute most of these assumptions. Our research confirms those studies and shows, in addition, that the Court cannot claim strong support among occasional political activists. …
Dimensions of Institutional Participation
The Politics of Federal Judicial Selection
Access to Justice and the Limits of Law
This article examines the relationship between persistent demands for “access to justice” and the relatively low yield of court‐oriented social reform strategies. Access to justice has a symbolic attraction which is impossible to deny. Access may not insure justice or social reform, but it is an important political resource from which strategic bargaining advantages may flow. But the importance of the right to participate may be inversely related…
Political Justice in the Democratic State
The clash between individual rights and social order, a perennial problem for all governments, has rendered standards of justice especially precarious in the realm of politics. To attain political ends through resort to legal process is a temptation which even "good" governments have frequently been unable to resist. Joel Grossman sees it as an inherent problem of the liberal democratic state and extends his analysis to the whole range of governm…
Litigation in the Federal Courts
Courts, unlike most other political institutions, depend almost exclusively on the actions of others to initiate proceedings which comprise their agendas of decision-making. Formal rules and custom proscribe the independent searching out of cases by American courts. These courts may, in a sense, invite litigation by the way they handle certain kinds of issues, but they must await the development of real "cases and controversies;" and, more import…
Courts and Conflict Resolution
This article attempts to assess the role of courts and other adjudicative institutions in the definition, interpretation, and management of conflict. Understanding the function of courts requires an understanding of a society's entire range of conflict management mechanisms. Particular emphasis is placed on those variables most likely to determine where and how conflicts will be solved.Adjudicative institutions can be effectively differentiated b…
Constitutional and Judicial Policy Making
VRÜ Verfassung und Recht in Übersee , Seite 354 - 355
Constitutional Law and Judicial Policy-Making
Law and Change in Modern America
The Supreme Court and Social Change
Law and Society
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Further Thoughts on Consensus and Conversion
Frontiers of Judicial Research
Law and Society
Dissenting Blocs on the Warren Court
Law And Society
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policymaker
The most frequent explanations for the endurance of the Supreme Court's policies and of its power as a national policymaker assume public reverence for the Court, widespread support for it as an institution, or broad‐based agreement with its policies. Public opinion studies refute most of these assumptions. Our research confirms those studies and shows, in addition, that the Court cannot claim strong support among occasional political activists. …
Litigation in the Federal Courts
Courts, unlike most other political institutions, depend almost exclusively on the actions of others to initiate proceedings which comprise their agendas of decision-making. Formal rules and custom proscribe the independent searching out of cases by American courts. These courts may, in a sense, invite litigation by the way they handle certain kinds of issues, but they must await the development of real "cases and controversies;" and, more import…
Courts and Conflict Resolution
This article attempts to assess the role of courts and other adjudicative institutions in the definition, interpretation, and management of conflict. Understanding the function of courts requires an understanding of a society's entire range of conflict management mechanisms. Particular emphasis is placed on those variables most likely to determine where and how conflicts will be solved.Adjudicative institutions can be effectively differentiated b…
Dimensions of Institutional Participation
Lawyers and Judges
Do the "Haves" Still Come Out Ahead
In the spring of 1998, the University of Wisconsin Law School sponsored a multidisciplinary conference to assess the impact of perhaps the most visible, widely cited, and influential article ever published in the law and society field: Marc Galanter's (1974) "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change." In that article Galanter attempts to explain the outcome of trial court litigation in essentially structural term…
Social Backgrounds and Judicial Decisions
Access to Justice and the Limits of Law
This article examines the relationship between persistent demands for “access to justice” and the relatively low yield of court‐oriented social reform strategies. Access to justice has a symbolic attraction which is impossible to deny. Access may not insure justice or social reform, but it is an important political resource from which strategic bargaining advantages may flow. But the importance of the right to participate may be inversely related…
Dissenting Blocs on the Warren Court
Political Justice in the Democratic State
The clash between individual rights and social order, a perennial problem for all governments, has rendered standards of justice especially precarious in the realm of politics. To attain political ends through resort to legal process is a temptation which even "good" governments have frequently been unable to resist. Joel Grossman sees it as an inherent problem of the liberal democratic state and extends his analysis to the whole range of governm…
The Supreme Court and Social Change
Bork's Law and The Closing of the Judicial Mind
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
On Mendelson on Conflict
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Lawyers and Judges
Lawyers and Judges
Judicial Behavior
Lawyers and Judges
Social Backgrounds and Judicial Decisions
Dissenting Blocs on the Warren Court
Law And Society
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Further Thoughts on Consensus and Conversion
Frontiers of Judicial Research
Law and Society
The Supreme Court and Social Change
Law and Society
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Law and Change in Modern America
Constitutional Law and Judicial Policy-Making
Constitutional and Judicial Policy Making
VRÜ Verfassung und Recht in Übersee , Seite 354 - 355
Litigation in the Federal Courts
Courts, unlike most other political institutions, depend almost exclusively on the actions of others to initiate proceedings which comprise their agendas of decision-making. Formal rules and custom proscribe the independent searching out of cases by American courts. These courts may, in a sense, invite litigation by the way they handle certain kinds of issues, but they must await the development of real "cases and controversies;" and, more import…
Courts and Conflict Resolution
This article attempts to assess the role of courts and other adjudicative institutions in the definition, interpretation, and management of conflict. Understanding the function of courts requires an understanding of a society's entire range of conflict management mechanisms. Particular emphasis is placed on those variables most likely to determine where and how conflicts will be solved.Adjudicative institutions can be effectively differentiated b…
Political Justice in the Democratic State
The clash between individual rights and social order, a perennial problem for all governments, has rendered standards of justice especially precarious in the realm of politics. To attain political ends through resort to legal process is a temptation which even "good" governments have frequently been unable to resist. Joel Grossman sees it as an inherent problem of the liberal democratic state and extends his analysis to the whole range of governm…
The Politics of Federal Judicial Selection
Access to Justice and the Limits of Law
This article examines the relationship between persistent demands for “access to justice” and the relatively low yield of court‐oriented social reform strategies. Access to justice has a symbolic attraction which is impossible to deny. Access may not insure justice or social reform, but it is an important political resource from which strategic bargaining advantages may flow. But the importance of the right to participate may be inversely related…
Dimensions of Institutional Participation
Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policymaker
The most frequent explanations for the endurance of the Supreme Court's policies and of its power as a national policymaker assume public reverence for the Court, widespread support for it as an institution, or broad‐based agreement with its policies. Public opinion studies refute most of these assumptions. Our research confirms those studies and shows, in addition, that the Court cannot claim strong support among occasional political activists. …
The Supreme Court's Third Century
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
The Supreme Court's Third Century
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Political science (30 obras) · Law (24 obras) · Sociology (23 obras) · Law (19 obras) · Law and economics (17 obras) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (14 obras) · Politics (14 obras) · Computer Science (11 obras) · Legal and Constitutional Studies (9 obras) · American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 obras)