Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Michael V Wedin

Dados Biográficos

ID1047765
NOMEMichael V Wedin
PRENOMESMichael V
SOBRENOMEWedin
ASSINATURAWEDIN M V
AFILIAÇÕESUniversity of California, Davis
VERIFICADONão
TOTAL DE OBRAS23
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES0
TOTAL COMO AUTOR21
TOTAL COMO EDITOR2
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO1977
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2017
ÍNDICE H0
  • Chapter 5. Aristotle on the Mind’s Self-Motion

    Michael V Wedin•CHAPTER•Self-Motion•2017

  • Parmenides’ Grand Deduction

    Michael V Wedin•BOOK•Parmenides' Grand Deduction•2014

    Michael V. Wedin presents a new interpretation of Parmenides' 'Way of truth': the most important philosophical treatise before the work of Plato and Aristotle. The 'Way of truth' contains the first extended philosophical argument in the western tradition-an argument which decrees that there can be no motion, change, growth, coming to be, or destruction; and indeed that there can be only one thing. These severe metaphysical theses are established …

  • Human Nature and Natural Knowledge

    A Perovich, B Donagan et al.•BOOK•Human Nature and Natural Knowledge•2012

  • Aristotle on the Impossibility of Anaximander’s apeiron

    Michael V Wedin, Michael Wedin•ARTICLE•Phronesis•2012

    In On Generation and Corruption , Aristotle rejects the very possibility of such a thing as Anaximander’s apeiron . Characterized as a kind of intermediate stuff, the apeiron turns out to consist of contraries and as such is impossible. Commentators have rightly noted this point and some have also indicated that Aristotle offers an argument of sorts for his negative estimate. However, the argument has received scant attention, and it is fair to s…

  • Aristotle on the Firmness of the Principle of Non-Contradiction

    Michael V Wedin, Michael Wedin•ARTICLE•Phronesis•2004•Referências: 1

    In Metaphysics Gamma 3 Aristotle declares that the philosopher investigates things that are qua things that are and that he therefore should be able to state the firmest principles of everything. The firmest principle of all is identified as the principle of non-contradiction (PNC). The main focus of Gamma 3 is Aristotle's proof for this identification. This paper begins with remarks about Aristotle's notion of the firmness of a principle and the…

  • Aristotle's Theory of Substance

    Michael V Wedin•BOOK•Aristotle's theory of substance•2002

    The Categories and Metaphysics Zeta (Book VII) are often thought to be incompatible because each posits different candidates for the title of primary substance or ousia. In the Categories, primary substance is the concrete individual thing, while in Zeta, it is the form or essence of the individual thing, which is now understood as a composite of form and matter. In this book, Wedin rejects the thesis of incompatibilism, and in its stead argues t…

  • Aristotle's Theory of Substance

    Charlotte Witt, Michael V Wedin et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2002

  • Some Logical Problems in Metaphysics Gamma

    Michael V Wedin•CHAPTER•Oxford Studies in Ancient…•2000

    Metaphysics I’ 4 opens with a reference to persons who (a) say (cpaai) that it is possible for the same thing to be and not to be and (b) hold things to be the case in just this way (v1roAaμ,(3avELV oihw,).1 Certain of the writers on nature are said to ‘make use of this thesis’ (xpwvrni Tl(J :\6yqi). The thesis in question is presumably (a), and so (b) probably adverts to specific claims that violate the principle of non-contradiction, claims of …

  • The Strategy of Aristotle’s Categories

    Michael V Wedin, Michael Wedin•ARTICLE•Archiv für Geschichte der…•1997

    L'A. defend la these selon laquelle la definition des trois notions techniques -l'homonymie, la synonymie et la paronymie-, developpee des le debut des «Categories» d'Aristote, definit la strategie et l'unite des cinq premiers chapitres de l'ouvrage. Bien plus, elle permet de mettre en avant la relation de synonymie comme seul principe qui puisse soutenir l'ensemble du systeme des «Categories» traitant du probleme de l'objet individuel et/ou univ…

  • Aristotle on how to define a psychological state

    Open Access•Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•Topoi•1996

  • Keeping the Matter in Mind

    Open Access•Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•Pacific philosophical quarterly•1995

  • Content and Cause in the Aristotelian Mind

    Open Access•Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•1993

  • Nonsubstantial Individuals

    Michael V Wedin, Michael Wedin•ARTICLE•Phronesis•1993

  • The Origins of Aristotelian Science

    Michael V Wedin, Michael Ferejohn•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1993

  • Mind and Imagination in Aristotle

    Joseph Owens, Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•The Classical World•1991

  • Negation and quantification in aristotle

    Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•History and Philosophy of Logic•1990

    Two main claims are defended. The first is that negative categorical statements are not to be accorded existential import insofar as they figure in the square of opposition. Against Kneale and others, it is argued that Aristotle formulates his o statements, for example, precisely to avoid existential commitment. This frees Aristotle's square from a recent charge of inconsistency. The second claim is that the logic proper provides much thinner evi…

  • Aristotle on the Mechanics of Thought

    Michael V Wedin, Inc Mathesis Publications et al.•ARTICLE•Ancient Philosophy•1989

  • Mind and Imagination in Aristotle

    Michael V Wedin•BOOK•Mind and Imagination in Aristotle•1988

  • Mind and imagination in Aristotle

    Michael V Wedin•BOOK•Mind and imagination in Aristotle•1988

  • Human Nature and Natural Knowledge

    Open Access•Alan Donagan, Anthony N Perovich et al.•BOOK•Human Nature and Natural Knowledge•1985

  • Aristotle on the Good for Man

    Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•Mind•1981

    Aristotle on the Good for Man Get access MICHAEL V. WEDIN MICHAEL V. WEDIN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIADAVIS Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Mind, Volume XC, Issue 358, April 1981, Pages 243–262, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XC.358.243 Published: 01 April 1981

  • Aristotle on the Existential Import of Singular Sentences

    Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•Phronesis•1978

    Aristotle is sometimes held to the thesis [Ti] that singular affirmative sentences imply the existence of a bearer for the grammatical subject of the sentence. Thus the truth of Socrates is sick requires that something exist which is identical with Socrates. Attribution of TI to Aristotle can be justified by appeal to Categories 13 b 27-33 which seems to contain a straightforward statement of the thesis. Unfortunately, T I's status becomes proble…

  • Αυτα τα iσα and the Argument at Phaedo 74b7-c5

    Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•Phronesis•1977

Sem obras proeminentes nesta página.

  • Αυτα τα iσα and the Argument at Phaedo 74b7-c5

    Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•Phronesis•1977

  • Aristotle on the Existential Import of Singular Sentences

    Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•Phronesis•1978

    Aristotle is sometimes held to the thesis [Ti] that singular affirmative sentences imply the existence of a bearer for the grammatical subject of the sentence. Thus the truth of Socrates is sick requires that something exist which is identical with Socrates. Attribution of TI to Aristotle can be justified by appeal to Categories 13 b 27-33 which seems to contain a straightforward statement of the thesis. Unfortunately, T I's status becomes proble…

  • Aristotle on the Good for Man

    Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•Mind•1981

    Aristotle on the Good for Man Get access MICHAEL V. WEDIN MICHAEL V. WEDIN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIADAVIS Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Mind, Volume XC, Issue 358, April 1981, Pages 243–262, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XC.358.243 Published: 01 April 1981

  • Human Nature and Natural Knowledge

    Open Access•Alan Donagan, Anthony N Perovich et al.•BOOK•Human Nature and Natural Knowledge•1985

  • Mind and Imagination in Aristotle

    Michael V Wedin•BOOK•Mind and Imagination in Aristotle•1988

  • Mind and imagination in Aristotle

    Michael V Wedin•BOOK•Mind and imagination in Aristotle•1988

  • Aristotle on the Mechanics of Thought

    Michael V Wedin, Inc Mathesis Publications et al.•ARTICLE•Ancient Philosophy•1989

  • Negation and quantification in aristotle

    Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•History and Philosophy of Logic•1990

    Two main claims are defended. The first is that negative categorical statements are not to be accorded existential import insofar as they figure in the square of opposition. Against Kneale and others, it is argued that Aristotle formulates his o statements, for example, precisely to avoid existential commitment. This frees Aristotle's square from a recent charge of inconsistency. The second claim is that the logic proper provides much thinner evi…

  • Mind and Imagination in Aristotle

    Joseph Owens, Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•The Classical World•1991

  • Content and Cause in the Aristotelian Mind

    Open Access•Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•1993

  • Nonsubstantial Individuals

    Michael V Wedin, Michael Wedin•ARTICLE•Phronesis•1993

  • The Origins of Aristotelian Science

    Michael V Wedin, Michael Ferejohn•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1993

  • Keeping the Matter in Mind

    Open Access•Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•Pacific philosophical quarterly•1995

  • Aristotle on how to define a psychological state

    Open Access•Michael V Wedin•ARTICLE•Topoi•1996

  • The Strategy of Aristotle’s Categories

    Michael V Wedin, Michael Wedin•ARTICLE•Archiv für Geschichte der…•1997

    L'A. defend la these selon laquelle la definition des trois notions techniques -l'homonymie, la synonymie et la paronymie-, developpee des le debut des «Categories» d'Aristote, definit la strategie et l'unite des cinq premiers chapitres de l'ouvrage. Bien plus, elle permet de mettre en avant la relation de synonymie comme seul principe qui puisse soutenir l'ensemble du systeme des «Categories» traitant du probleme de l'objet individuel et/ou univ…

  • Some Logical Problems in Metaphysics Gamma

    Michael V Wedin•CHAPTER•Oxford Studies in Ancient…•2000

    Metaphysics I’ 4 opens with a reference to persons who (a) say (cpaai) that it is possible for the same thing to be and not to be and (b) hold things to be the case in just this way (v1roAaμ,(3avELV oihw,).1 Certain of the writers on nature are said to ‘make use of this thesis’ (xpwvrni Tl(J :\6yqi). The thesis in question is presumably (a), and so (b) probably adverts to specific claims that violate the principle of non-contradiction, claims of …

  • Aristotle's Theory of Substance

    Michael V Wedin•BOOK•Aristotle's theory of substance•2002

    The Categories and Metaphysics Zeta (Book VII) are often thought to be incompatible because each posits different candidates for the title of primary substance or ousia. In the Categories, primary substance is the concrete individual thing, while in Zeta, it is the form or essence of the individual thing, which is now understood as a composite of form and matter. In this book, Wedin rejects the thesis of incompatibilism, and in its stead argues t…

  • Aristotle's Theory of Substance

    Charlotte Witt, Michael V Wedin et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2002

  • Aristotle on the Firmness of the Principle of Non-Contradiction

    Michael V Wedin, Michael Wedin•ARTICLE•Phronesis•2004•Referências: 1

    In Metaphysics Gamma 3 Aristotle declares that the philosopher investigates things that are qua things that are and that he therefore should be able to state the firmest principles of everything. The firmest principle of all is identified as the principle of non-contradiction (PNC). The main focus of Gamma 3 is Aristotle's proof for this identification. This paper begins with remarks about Aristotle's notion of the firmness of a principle and the…

  • Human Nature and Natural Knowledge

    A Perovich, B Donagan et al.•BOOK•Human Nature and Natural Knowledge•2012

  • Aristotle on the Impossibility of Anaximander’s apeiron

    Michael V Wedin, Michael Wedin•ARTICLE•Phronesis•2012

    In On Generation and Corruption , Aristotle rejects the very possibility of such a thing as Anaximander’s apeiron . Characterized as a kind of intermediate stuff, the apeiron turns out to consist of contraries and as such is impossible. Commentators have rightly noted this point and some have also indicated that Aristotle offers an argument of sorts for his negative estimate. However, the argument has received scant attention, and it is fair to s…

  • Parmenides’ Grand Deduction

    Michael V Wedin•BOOK•Parmenides' Grand Deduction•2014

    Michael V. Wedin presents a new interpretation of Parmenides' 'Way of truth': the most important philosophical treatise before the work of Plato and Aristotle. The 'Way of truth' contains the first extended philosophical argument in the western tradition-an argument which decrees that there can be no motion, change, growth, coming to be, or destruction; and indeed that there can be only one thing. These severe metaphysical theses are established …

  • Chapter 5. Aristotle on the Mind’s Self-Motion

    Michael V Wedin•CHAPTER•Self-Motion•2017

Philosophy (20 obras) · Classical Philosophy and Thought (19 obras) · Epistemology (17 obras) · Computer Science (7 obras) · Psychology (7 obras) · Ancient philosophy (6 obras) · Art (5 obras) · Linguistics (5 obras) · Philosophy (5 obras) · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae