Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Michael C Tolley

Dados Biográficos

ID1148076
NOMEMichael C Tolley
PRENOMESMichael C
SOBRENOMETolley
ASSINATURATOLLEY M C
VERIFICADONão
TOTAL DE OBRAS5
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES19
TOTAL COMO AUTOR5
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO1996
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2012
ÍNDICE H2
  • Judicialization of Politics in Europe

    Michael C Tolley, M Tolley•ARTICLE•Journal of Human Rights•2012•Citada por: 2•Referências: 4

    In Europe's multilayered constitutional arrangements, the work of national courts is increasingly influenced by directives and regulations of the European Council and Commission and decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights or Strasbourg Court as it is generally identified. Examined in this article are the recent efforts by courts in Germany, France, Italy, and the United Kingdom to keep pace w…

  • Parliamentary Scrutiny of Rights in the United Kingdom

    Michael C Tolley, M Tolley•ARTICLE•Australian Journal of Political…•2009•Citada por: 9•Referências: 11

    This article examines the work of the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) and assesses its effectiveness in safeguarding fundamental rights in the United Kingdom. In 2001, Parliament created the JCHR to scrutinize legislation for compliance with the Human Rights Act 1998 and the UK's international human rights commitments. Data on the impact of JCHR reports on the work of Parliament and courts are collected and used to evaluate the efficacy of…

  • Judicial Review of Agency Interpretation of Statutes

    Open Access•Michael C Tolley, M Tolley•ARTICLE•Policy Studies Journal•2003•Citada por: 8•Referências: 1

    Examined in this article are the deference doctrines developed by courts in the United States, Canada, Britain, Australia and South Africa. Deference doctrines determine when and if courts are to defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the ambiguous terms of the statute that the agency administers. The study of deference doctrines in comparative perspective reveals much about the need for agency autonomy in the modern administrative sta…

  • Courts of Admiralty in Colonial America

    Herbert A Johnson, David R Owens et al.•ARTICLE•The William and Mary Quarterly•1997

  • Courts of Admiralty in Colonial America

    Henry J Bourguignon, David R Owen et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Legal History•1996

    Journal Article Courts of Admiralty in Colonial America: The Maryland Experience, 1634–1776 Get access Owen David R. Tolley Michael C., Courts of Admiralty in Colonial America: The Maryland Experience, 1634–1776. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press, 1995. xxxiii, 421 pp. $45.00. Henry J. Bourguignon Henry J. Bourguignon University of Toledo College of Law Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal …

  • Parliamentary Scrutiny of Rights in the United Kingdom

    Michael C Tolley, M Tolley•ARTICLE•Australian Journal of Political…•2009•Citada por: 9•Referências: 11

    This article examines the work of the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) and assesses its effectiveness in safeguarding fundamental rights in the United Kingdom. In 2001, Parliament created the JCHR to scrutinize legislation for compliance with the Human Rights Act 1998 and the UK's international human rights commitments. Data on the impact of JCHR reports on the work of Parliament and courts are collected and used to evaluate the efficacy of…

  • Judicial Review of Agency Interpretation of Statutes

    Open Access•Michael C Tolley, M Tolley•ARTICLE•Policy Studies Journal•2003•Citada por: 8•Referências: 1

    Examined in this article are the deference doctrines developed by courts in the United States, Canada, Britain, Australia and South Africa. Deference doctrines determine when and if courts are to defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the ambiguous terms of the statute that the agency administers. The study of deference doctrines in comparative perspective reveals much about the need for agency autonomy in the modern administrative sta…

  • Judicialization of Politics in Europe

    Michael C Tolley, M Tolley•ARTICLE•Journal of Human Rights•2012•Citada por: 2•Referências: 4

    In Europe's multilayered constitutional arrangements, the work of national courts is increasingly influenced by directives and regulations of the European Council and Commission and decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights or Strasbourg Court as it is generally identified. Examined in this article are the recent efforts by courts in Germany, France, Italy, and the United Kingdom to keep pace w…

  • Courts of Admiralty in Colonial America

    Henry J Bourguignon, David R Owen et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Legal History•1996

    Journal Article Courts of Admiralty in Colonial America: The Maryland Experience, 1634–1776 Get access Owen David R. Tolley Michael C., Courts of Admiralty in Colonial America: The Maryland Experience, 1634–1776. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press, 1995. xxxiii, 421 pp. $45.00. Henry J. Bourguignon Henry J. Bourguignon University of Toledo College of Law Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar American Journal …

  • Courts of Admiralty in Colonial America

    Herbert A Johnson, David R Owens et al.•ARTICLE•The William and Mary Quarterly•1997

  • Judicial Review of Agency Interpretation of Statutes

    Open Access•Michael C Tolley, M Tolley•ARTICLE•Policy Studies Journal•2003•Citada por: 8•Referências: 1

    Examined in this article are the deference doctrines developed by courts in the United States, Canada, Britain, Australia and South Africa. Deference doctrines determine when and if courts are to defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the ambiguous terms of the statute that the agency administers. The study of deference doctrines in comparative perspective reveals much about the need for agency autonomy in the modern administrative sta…

  • Parliamentary Scrutiny of Rights in the United Kingdom

    Michael C Tolley, M Tolley•ARTICLE•Australian Journal of Political…•2009•Citada por: 9•Referências: 11

    This article examines the work of the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) and assesses its effectiveness in safeguarding fundamental rights in the United Kingdom. In 2001, Parliament created the JCHR to scrutinize legislation for compliance with the Human Rights Act 1998 and the UK's international human rights commitments. Data on the impact of JCHR reports on the work of Parliament and courts are collected and used to evaluate the efficacy of…

  • Judicialization of Politics in Europe

    Michael C Tolley, M Tolley•ARTICLE•Journal of Human Rights•2012•Citada por: 2•Referências: 4

    In Europe's multilayered constitutional arrangements, the work of national courts is increasingly influenced by directives and regulations of the European Council and Commission and decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights or Strasbourg Court as it is generally identified. Examined in this article are the recent efforts by courts in Germany, France, Italy, and the United Kingdom to keep pace w…

Political science (5 obras) · Law (4 obras) · Law (4 obras) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 obras) · Colonialism (2 obras) · Fundamental rights (2 obras) · History (2 obras) · History (2 obras) · Human rights (2 obras) · International human rights law (2 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae