Martín Abreu Zavaleta
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 1294059 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Martín Abreu Zavaleta |
| PRENOMES | Martín Abreu |
| SOBRENOME | Zavaleta |
| ASSINATURA | ZAVALETA M A |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Syracuse University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5784-7953 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 4 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 8 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 4 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2021 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2024 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
Negotiated contextualism and disagreement data
Partial understanding
Inferences from Utterance to Belief
If Amelia utters 'Brad ate a salad in 2005' assertorically, and she is speaking literally and sincerely, then I can infer that Amelia believes that Brad ate a salad in 2005. This paper discusses what makes this kind of inference truth-preserving. According to the baseline picture, my inference is truth-preserving because, if Amelia is a competent speaker, she believes that the sentence she uttered means that Brad ate a salad in 2005; thus, if Ame…
Disagreement lost
This paper develops a puzzle about non-merely-verbal disputes. At first sight, it would seem that a dispute over the truth of an utterance is not merely verbal only if there is a proposition that the parties to the dispute take the utterance under dispute to express, which one of the parties accepts and the other rejects. Yet, as I argue, it is extremely rare for ordinary disputes over an utterance’s truth to satisfy this condition, in which case…
Disagreement lost
This paper develops a puzzle about non-merely-verbal disputes. At first sight, it would seem that a dispute over the truth of an utterance is not merely verbal only if there is a proposition that the parties to the dispute take the utterance under dispute to express, which one of the parties accepts and the other rejects. Yet, as I argue, it is extremely rare for ordinary disputes over an utterance’s truth to satisfy this condition, in which case…
Partial understanding
Inferences from Utterance to Belief
If Amelia utters 'Brad ate a salad in 2005' assertorically, and she is speaking literally and sincerely, then I can infer that Amelia believes that Brad ate a salad in 2005. This paper discusses what makes this kind of inference truth-preserving. According to the baseline picture, my inference is truth-preserving because, if Amelia is a competent speaker, she believes that the sentence she uttered means that Brad ate a salad in 2005; thus, if Ame…
Disagreement lost
This paper develops a puzzle about non-merely-verbal disputes. At first sight, it would seem that a dispute over the truth of an utterance is not merely verbal only if there is a proposition that the parties to the dispute take the utterance under dispute to express, which one of the parties accepts and the other rejects. Yet, as I argue, it is extremely rare for ordinary disputes over an utterance’s truth to satisfy this condition, in which case…
Partial understanding
Inferences from Utterance to Belief
If Amelia utters 'Brad ate a salad in 2005' assertorically, and she is speaking literally and sincerely, then I can infer that Amelia believes that Brad ate a salad in 2005. This paper discusses what makes this kind of inference truth-preserving. According to the baseline picture, my inference is truth-preserving because, if Amelia is a competent speaker, she believes that the sentence she uttered means that Brad ate a salad in 2005; thus, if Ame…
Negotiated contextualism and disagreement data
Epistemology (4 obras) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 obras) · Linguistics (4 obras) · Philosophy (4 obras) · Computer Science (3 obras) · Metaphysics (3 obras) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 obras) · Philosophy of language (3 obras) · Utterance (3 obras) · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 obras)