Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Andreas Broscheid

Dados Biográficos

ID1493455
NOMEAndreas Broscheid
PRENOMESAndreas
SOBRENOMEBroscheid
ASSINATURABROSCHEID A
AFILIAÇÕESMax Planck Institute for the Study of Societies
ORCID0000-0001-7497-7170
VERIFICADOSim
TOTAL DE OBRAS4
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES173
TOTAL COMO AUTOR4
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO2003
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2011
ÍNDICE H3
  • Comparing Circuits

    Open Access•Andreas Broscheid•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•2011•Citada por: 3•Referências: 21

    This article investigates possible ideological differences between circuits of the U.S. Courts of Appeals. It looks at the distribution of three-judge panel ideologies on the circuits and at differences in decisionmaking patterns, testing several theoretical approaches to circuit differences: the attitudinalist approach, arguing that different judicial ideologies account for intercircuit differences; historical-institutionalist approaches that ar…

  • Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU

    Andreas Broscheid, David Coen•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2007•Citada por: 79•Referências: 28

    This paper presents a quantitative look at lobbying activity and the emergence of institutional fora in the European Union (EU). Specifically, the paper explores why the number of interest representatives differs across policy domains, and why we find institutionalized fora for interest representation for some policy issues but not others. Building on a strategic lobbying model, the paper shows empirically that Commission activity influences inte…

  • Public Members on Medical Licensing Boards and the Choice of Entry Barriers

    Open Access•Andreas Broscheid, Paul Teske et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2003•Citada por: 3•Referências: 10

  • Insider and Outsider Lobbying of the European Commission

    Open Access•Andreas Broscheid, David Coen•ARTICLE•European Union Politics•2003•Citada por: 88•Referências: 32

    We propose an informational model of lobbying to understand macro-characteristics of lobbying systems. We are particularly interested in the number of lobbyists in a system, and the distinction between insider and outsider lobbyists. Empirically, we seek to explain the post-Maastricht lobbying boom in the European Union and the concomitant establishment of European Commission forums for interest representation. Using a simple model of information…

  • Insider and Outsider Lobbying of the European Commission

    Open Access•Andreas Broscheid, David Coen•ARTICLE•European Union Politics•2003•Citada por: 88•Referências: 32

    We propose an informational model of lobbying to understand macro-characteristics of lobbying systems. We are particularly interested in the number of lobbyists in a system, and the distinction between insider and outsider lobbyists. Empirically, we seek to explain the post-Maastricht lobbying boom in the European Union and the concomitant establishment of European Commission forums for interest representation. Using a simple model of information…

  • Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU

    Andreas Broscheid, David Coen•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2007•Citada por: 79•Referências: 28

    This paper presents a quantitative look at lobbying activity and the emergence of institutional fora in the European Union (EU). Specifically, the paper explores why the number of interest representatives differs across policy domains, and why we find institutionalized fora for interest representation for some policy issues but not others. Building on a strategic lobbying model, the paper shows empirically that Commission activity influences inte…

  • Comparing Circuits

    Open Access•Andreas Broscheid•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•2011•Citada por: 3•Referências: 21

    This article investigates possible ideological differences between circuits of the U.S. Courts of Appeals. It looks at the distribution of three-judge panel ideologies on the circuits and at differences in decisionmaking patterns, testing several theoretical approaches to circuit differences: the attitudinalist approach, arguing that different judicial ideologies account for intercircuit differences; historical-institutionalist approaches that ar…

  • Public Members on Medical Licensing Boards and the Choice of Entry Barriers

    Open Access•Andreas Broscheid, Paul Teske et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2003•Citada por: 3•Referências: 10

  • Public Members on Medical Licensing Boards and the Choice of Entry Barriers

    Open Access•Andreas Broscheid, Paul Teske et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2003•Citada por: 3•Referências: 10

  • Insider and Outsider Lobbying of the European Commission

    Open Access•Andreas Broscheid, David Coen•ARTICLE•European Union Politics•2003•Citada por: 88•Referências: 32

    We propose an informational model of lobbying to understand macro-characteristics of lobbying systems. We are particularly interested in the number of lobbyists in a system, and the distinction between insider and outsider lobbyists. Empirically, we seek to explain the post-Maastricht lobbying boom in the European Union and the concomitant establishment of European Commission forums for interest representation. Using a simple model of information…

  • Lobbying activity and fora creation in the EU

    Andreas Broscheid, David Coen•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2007•Citada por: 79•Referências: 28

    This paper presents a quantitative look at lobbying activity and the emergence of institutional fora in the European Union (EU). Specifically, the paper explores why the number of interest representatives differs across policy domains, and why we find institutionalized fora for interest representation for some policy issues but not others. Building on a strategic lobbying model, the paper shows empirically that Commission activity influences inte…

  • Comparing Circuits

    Open Access•Andreas Broscheid•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•2011•Citada por: 3•Referências: 21

    This article investigates possible ideological differences between circuits of the U.S. Courts of Appeals. It looks at the distribution of three-judge panel ideologies on the circuits and at differences in decisionmaking patterns, testing several theoretical approaches to circuit differences: the attitudinalist approach, arguing that different judicial ideologies account for intercircuit differences; historical-institutionalist approaches that ar…

Economics (4 obras) · Law (4 obras) · Political science (4 obras) · Law (3 obras) · Law and economics (3 obras) · Politics (3 obras) · Argument (complex analysis (2 obras) · Commission (2 obras) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 obras) · European commission (2 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae