Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Michael N Stagnaro

Dados Biográficos

ID1751918
NOMEMichael N Stagnaro
PRENOMESMichael N
SOBRENOMEStagnaro
ASSINATURASTAGNARO M N
AFILIAÇÕESMassachusetts Institute of Technology
ORCID0000-0001-5512-7218
VERIFICADOSim
TOTAL DE OBRAS10
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES55
TOTAL COMO AUTOR10
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO2012
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2025
ÍNDICE H2
  • On the role of analytic thinking in religious belief change

    Open Access•Michael N Stagnaro, Gordon Pennycook•ARTICLE•Cognition•2025

  • How to design and conduct a megastudy

    Open Access•Jan Gerrit Voelkel, J Chu et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2024•Referências: 14

  • Author Correction

    Open Access•Antonio A Arechar, Jennifer Allen et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents

    Open Access•Antonio A Arechar, Jennifer Allen et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2023•Citada por: 9•Referências: 49

  • Do religious and market-based institutions promote cooperation in Hadza hunter-gatherers

    Michael N Stagnaro, D N E Stibbard-Hawkes et al.•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2022

    Humans’ willingness to bear costs to benefit others is an evolutionary puzzle. Cultural group selection proposes a possible answer to this puzzle—cooperative norms and institutions proliferate due to group-level benefits. For instance, belief in knowledgeable, moralizing deities is theorized to decrease selfishness and favoritism through threat of supernatural punishment. Similarly, norms of fairness and cooperation are theorized to have coevolve…

  • Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes

    Open Access•Jan Gerrit Voelkel, James Chu et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2022•Citada por: 45•Referências: 45

  • Are those who believe in God really more prosocial

    Michael N Stagnaro, Antonio A Arechar et al.•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2020

    Whether those who believe in God are more prosocial has been a long debated topic. Here we shed new light on this question by examining giving in incentivized Dictator Games where no mention of religion was made, played online with anonymous strangers. Study 1 (N = 15,827) found a significant correlation between belief and giving, r = .122 (robust to demographics). Study 2 (N = 2334) included the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to examine whether…

  • Breaches of Trust Change the Content and Structure of Religious Appeals

    B G Purzycki, Michael N Stagnaro et al.•ARTICLE•Journal for the Study of Religion…•2020•Citada por: 1•Referências: 17

    Considerable work suggests that social and environmental pressures can influence religious commitment, the content of beliefs, and features of ritual. Some ecologically minded theories of religion posit that crosscultural variation in beliefs and practices can be partly explained by their utility in addressing persistent threats to cooperation and coordination. However, little experimental work has assessed whether or not socioecological pressure…

  • Profit Versus Prejudice

    Open Access•Michael N Stagnaro, Yarrow Dunham et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2018

    We examine the possibility that self-interest, typically thought to undermine social welfare, might reduce in-group bias. We compared the dictator game (DG), where participants unilaterally divide money between themselves and a recipient, and the ultimatum game (UG), where the recipient can reject these offers. Unlike the DG, there is a self-interested motive for UG giving: If participants expect the rejection of unfair offers, they have a moneta…

  • Stereotyping From the Perspective of Perceivers and Targets

    Open Access•Saera R Khan, Teena Benda et al.•ARTICLE•Online Readings in Psychology and…•2012

    This article provides insight into the process of stereotyping from two different perspectives: the perceiver and the target. From the perceiver's perspective, motivational and cognitive reasons for relying on stereotypes for judgment are discussed. From the targets’ perspective, stereotype threat research is reviewed. From both perspectives, it is clear that stereotypes represent a dual-edged sword for both perceiver and target group members. Fi…

  • Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes

    Open Access•Jan Gerrit Voelkel, James Chu et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2022•Citada por: 45•Referências: 45

  • Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents

    Open Access•Antonio A Arechar, Jennifer Allen et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2023•Citada por: 9•Referências: 49

  • Breaches of Trust Change the Content and Structure of Religious Appeals

    B G Purzycki, Michael N Stagnaro et al.•ARTICLE•Journal for the Study of Religion…•2020•Citada por: 1•Referências: 17

    Considerable work suggests that social and environmental pressures can influence religious commitment, the content of beliefs, and features of ritual. Some ecologically minded theories of religion posit that crosscultural variation in beliefs and practices can be partly explained by their utility in addressing persistent threats to cooperation and coordination. However, little experimental work has assessed whether or not socioecological pressure…

  • Stereotyping From the Perspective of Perceivers and Targets

    Open Access•Saera R Khan, Teena Benda et al.•ARTICLE•Online Readings in Psychology and…•2012

    This article provides insight into the process of stereotyping from two different perspectives: the perceiver and the target. From the perceiver's perspective, motivational and cognitive reasons for relying on stereotypes for judgment are discussed. From the targets’ perspective, stereotype threat research is reviewed. From both perspectives, it is clear that stereotypes represent a dual-edged sword for both perceiver and target group members. Fi…

  • Profit Versus Prejudice

    Open Access•Michael N Stagnaro, Yarrow Dunham et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2018

    We examine the possibility that self-interest, typically thought to undermine social welfare, might reduce in-group bias. We compared the dictator game (DG), where participants unilaterally divide money between themselves and a recipient, and the ultimatum game (UG), where the recipient can reject these offers. Unlike the DG, there is a self-interested motive for UG giving: If participants expect the rejection of unfair offers, they have a moneta…

  • Are those who believe in God really more prosocial

    Michael N Stagnaro, Antonio A Arechar et al.•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2020

    Whether those who believe in God are more prosocial has been a long debated topic. Here we shed new light on this question by examining giving in incentivized Dictator Games where no mention of religion was made, played online with anonymous strangers. Study 1 (N = 15,827) found a significant correlation between belief and giving, r = .122 (robust to demographics). Study 2 (N = 2334) included the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to examine whether…

  • Breaches of Trust Change the Content and Structure of Religious Appeals

    B G Purzycki, Michael N Stagnaro et al.•ARTICLE•Journal for the Study of Religion…•2020•Citada por: 1•Referências: 17

    Considerable work suggests that social and environmental pressures can influence religious commitment, the content of beliefs, and features of ritual. Some ecologically minded theories of religion posit that crosscultural variation in beliefs and practices can be partly explained by their utility in addressing persistent threats to cooperation and coordination. However, little experimental work has assessed whether or not socioecological pressure…

  • Do religious and market-based institutions promote cooperation in Hadza hunter-gatherers

    Michael N Stagnaro, D N E Stibbard-Hawkes et al.•ARTICLE•Religion Brain & Behavior•2022

    Humans’ willingness to bear costs to benefit others is an evolutionary puzzle. Cultural group selection proposes a possible answer to this puzzle—cooperative norms and institutions proliferate due to group-level benefits. For instance, belief in knowledgeable, moralizing deities is theorized to decrease selfishness and favoritism through threat of supernatural punishment. Similarly, norms of fairness and cooperation are theorized to have coevolve…

  • Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes

    Open Access•Jan Gerrit Voelkel, James Chu et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2022•Citada por: 45•Referências: 45

  • Author Correction

    Open Access•Antonio A Arechar, Jennifer Allen et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents

    Open Access•Antonio A Arechar, Jennifer Allen et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2023•Citada por: 9•Referências: 49

  • How to design and conduct a megastudy

    Open Access•Jan Gerrit Voelkel, J Chu et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Human Behaviour•2024•Referências: 14

  • On the role of analytic thinking in religious belief change

    Open Access•Michael N Stagnaro, Gordon Pennycook•ARTICLE•Cognition•2025

Psychology (8 obras) · Social Psychology (7 obras) · Law (4 obras) · Political science (4 obras) · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (3 obras) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 obras) · Sociology (3 obras) · Cognitive psychology (2 obras) · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (2 obras) · Economics (2 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae