Eyal Gamliel
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 226158 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Eyal Gamliel |
| PRENOMES | Eyal |
| SOBRENOME | Gamliel |
| ASSINATURA | GAMLIEL E |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Ruppin Academic Center |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9594-2791 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 9 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 7 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 9 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2005 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
The Intricate Nature of Evaluability
This research examines how evaluability is influenced by the interplay of attribute framing, magnitude information, and reference points. In two experiments, participants evaluated scenarios varying in framing valence (positive vs. negative), magnitude polarity, and the availability of a base‐rate reference point. The results indicated that framing valence systematically biased evaluations regardless of reference‐point availability and magnitude …
Effect of Relative Versus Absolute Quantitative Messages Regarding Suicide on the Perceived Severity of the Phenomenon
Presentation of epidemiological information about the absolute number of suicides has been used occasionally to increase awareness of the suicide phenomenon. This study investigated the effectiveness of absolute quantitative messages versus relative messages. An example of relative messages would be comparing the number of suicide deaths with the number of deaths by car accidents. Participants were randomly presented with absolute or relative mes…
The Role of Attention in Attribute Framing
The attribute‐framing bias refers to message recipients' tendency to evaluate objects framed positively (75% success) more favorably than they do objects framed negatively (25% failure), although one description is implied as the complementary of the other, and they are logically equivalent. According to the association‐valence account, positive or negative framing activates corresponding positive or negative associations that bias evaluations. B…
Are highly numerate individuals invulnerable to attribute framing bias? Comparing numerically and graphically represented attribute framing
Judgments and decisions are frequently biased by attribute framing, presenting either positive or negative attributes of an object. This paper focused on two factors previously shown to moderate the attribute‐framing bias: mode of presentation and participants' numeric ability. Whereas many studies demonstrated that graphical display reduced the bias, recent findings suggest that graphical manipulation can nevertheless elicit significant framing …
The Average Fuel‐Efficiency Fallacy
People falsely believe that equal increases in vehicles' fuel efficiency (e.g., miles per gallon (MPG)) will result in equal fuel savings. Whereas previous research on this “MPG illusion” has focused on people's biased choices of upgrading vehicle models, it has not examined a more common situation, namely, estimating a given vehicle's fuel efficiency based on the average of two efficiency values (e.g., in the city and on highways). In such situa…
Personality Traits Moderate Attribute Framing Effects
Previous research on attribute framing effects focused on context-specific variables that moderate it. This research examined whether two personality traits, namely agreeableness and conscientiousness, moderate the effect of attribute framing on the perceived fairness of allocation criteria. Two experiments showed that attribute framing affected the perceived fairness of allocation criteria for participants who score high on these personality tra…
To end life or not to prolong life
People ascribe "euthanasia" different values and view it differently. This study hypothesized that a different framing of objectively the same euthanasia situations would affect people's attitudes toward it. Indeed, "positive" framing of euthanasia as not prolonging life resulted in more support for both passive and active euthanasia relative to "negative" framing of the objectively same situations as ending life. Two experiments replicated this …
Positive versus Negative Framing Affects Justice Judgments
Online versus traditional teaching evaluation
Using an experimental mixed design, this study compared the traditional paper‐and‐pencil method for evaluating teaching with the online method. Replicating previous findings, the comparison revealed similar evaluation means of the two methods. However, the stability of teaching evaluations using paper‐and‐pencil twice was substantially higher than the corresponding stability using different methods—online and paper‐and‐pencil. One possible explan…
Positive versus Negative Framing Affects Justice Judgments
The Role of Attention in Attribute Framing
The attribute‐framing bias refers to message recipients' tendency to evaluate objects framed positively (75% success) more favorably than they do objects framed negatively (25% failure), although one description is implied as the complementary of the other, and they are logically equivalent. According to the association‐valence account, positive or negative framing activates corresponding positive or negative associations that bias evaluations. B…
To end life or not to prolong life
People ascribe "euthanasia" different values and view it differently. This study hypothesized that a different framing of objectively the same euthanasia situations would affect people's attitudes toward it. Indeed, "positive" framing of euthanasia as not prolonging life resulted in more support for both passive and active euthanasia relative to "negative" framing of the objectively same situations as ending life. Two experiments replicated this …
Online versus traditional teaching evaluation
Using an experimental mixed design, this study compared the traditional paper‐and‐pencil method for evaluating teaching with the online method. Replicating previous findings, the comparison revealed similar evaluation means of the two methods. However, the stability of teaching evaluations using paper‐and‐pencil twice was substantially higher than the corresponding stability using different methods—online and paper‐and‐pencil. One possible explan…
Positive versus Negative Framing Affects Justice Judgments
To end life or not to prolong life
People ascribe "euthanasia" different values and view it differently. This study hypothesized that a different framing of objectively the same euthanasia situations would affect people's attitudes toward it. Indeed, "positive" framing of euthanasia as not prolonging life resulted in more support for both passive and active euthanasia relative to "negative" framing of the objectively same situations as ending life. Two experiments replicated this …
Personality Traits Moderate Attribute Framing Effects
Previous research on attribute framing effects focused on context-specific variables that moderate it. This research examined whether two personality traits, namely agreeableness and conscientiousness, moderate the effect of attribute framing on the perceived fairness of allocation criteria. Two experiments showed that attribute framing affected the perceived fairness of allocation criteria for participants who score high on these personality tra…
The Average Fuel‐Efficiency Fallacy
People falsely believe that equal increases in vehicles' fuel efficiency (e.g., miles per gallon (MPG)) will result in equal fuel savings. Whereas previous research on this “MPG illusion” has focused on people's biased choices of upgrading vehicle models, it has not examined a more common situation, namely, estimating a given vehicle's fuel efficiency based on the average of two efficiency values (e.g., in the city and on highways). In such situa…
The Role of Attention in Attribute Framing
The attribute‐framing bias refers to message recipients' tendency to evaluate objects framed positively (75% success) more favorably than they do objects framed negatively (25% failure), although one description is implied as the complementary of the other, and they are logically equivalent. According to the association‐valence account, positive or negative framing activates corresponding positive or negative associations that bias evaluations. B…
Are highly numerate individuals invulnerable to attribute framing bias? Comparing numerically and graphically represented attribute framing
Judgments and decisions are frequently biased by attribute framing, presenting either positive or negative attributes of an object. This paper focused on two factors previously shown to moderate the attribute‐framing bias: mode of presentation and participants' numeric ability. Whereas many studies demonstrated that graphical display reduced the bias, recent findings suggest that graphical manipulation can nevertheless elicit significant framing …
Effect of Relative Versus Absolute Quantitative Messages Regarding Suicide on the Perceived Severity of the Phenomenon
Presentation of epidemiological information about the absolute number of suicides has been used occasionally to increase awareness of the suicide phenomenon. This study investigated the effectiveness of absolute quantitative messages versus relative messages. An example of relative messages would be comparing the number of suicide deaths with the number of deaths by car accidents. Participants were randomly presented with absolute or relative mes…
The Intricate Nature of Evaluability
This research examines how evaluability is influenced by the interplay of attribute framing, magnitude information, and reference points. In two experiments, participants evaluated scenarios varying in framing valence (positive vs. negative), magnitude polarity, and the availability of a base‐rate reference point. The results indicated that framing valence systematically biased evaluations regardless of reference‐point availability and magnitude …
Psychology (8 obras) · Framing effect (6 obras) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 obras) · Social Psychology (5 obras) · Framing (construction (4 obras) · Persuasion (4 obras) · Social Psychology (4 obras) · Engineering (3 obras) · Cognition (2 obras) · Cognitive psychology (2 obras)