Kevin M Carlsmith
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 228423 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Kevin M Carlsmith |
| PRENOMES | Kevin M |
| SOBRENOME | Carlsmith |
| ASSINATURA | CARLSMITH K M |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Colgate University |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 11 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 250 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 11 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1998 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2015 |
| ÍNDICE H | 6 |
Cognitive Dissonance
The Art of Laboratory Experimentation
2.1 Why do Laboratory Experiments? 2.2 Planning and Conducting a Laboratory Experiment 2.3 Concluding Comments
Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice
The fine line between interrogation and retribution
The paradoxical consequences of revenge
People expect to reap hedonic rewards when they punish an offender, but in at least some instances, revenge has hedonic consequences that are precisely the opposite of what people expect. Three studies showed that (a) one reason for this is that people who punish continue to ruminate about the offender, whereas those who do not punish "move on" and think less about the offender, and (b) people fail to appreciate the different affective consequenc…
On Justifying Punishment
The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment
Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment
One popular justification for punishment is the just deserts rationale: A person deserves punishment proportionate to the moral wrong committed. A competing justification is the deterrence rationale: Punishing an offender reduces the frequency and likelihood of future offenses. The authors examined the motivation underlying laypeople's use of punishment for prototypical wrongs. Study 1 (N = 336) revealed high sensitivity to factors uniquely assoc…
The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law
Criminal legal codes draw clear lines between permissible and illegal conduct, and the criminal justice system counts on people knowing these lines and governing their conduct accordingly. This is the "ex ante" function of the law; lines are drawn, and because citizens fear punishments or believe in the moral validity of the legal codes they do not cross these lines. But do people in fact know the lines that legal codes draw? The fact that severa…
Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment
What motivates a person's desire to punish actors who commit intentional, counternormative harms? Two possible answers are a just deserts motive or a desire to incarcerate the actor so that he cannot be a further danger to society. Research participants in two experiments assigned punishments to actors whose offenses were varied with respect to the moral seriousness of the offense and the likelihood that the perpetrator would commit similar futur…
Describing the Person's External Environment
Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment
One popular justification for punishment is the just deserts rationale: A person deserves punishment proportionate to the moral wrong committed. A competing justification is the deterrence rationale: Punishing an offender reduces the frequency and likelihood of future offenses. The authors examined the motivation underlying laypeople's use of punishment for prototypical wrongs. Study 1 (N = 336) revealed high sensitivity to factors uniquely assoc…
The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment
The paradoxical consequences of revenge
People expect to reap hedonic rewards when they punish an offender, but in at least some instances, revenge has hedonic consequences that are precisely the opposite of what people expect. Three studies showed that (a) one reason for this is that people who punish continue to ruminate about the offender, whereas those who do not punish "move on" and think less about the offender, and (b) people fail to appreciate the different affective consequenc…
On Justifying Punishment
The fine line between interrogation and retribution
The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law
Criminal legal codes draw clear lines between permissible and illegal conduct, and the criminal justice system counts on people knowing these lines and governing their conduct accordingly. This is the "ex ante" function of the law; lines are drawn, and because citizens fear punishments or believe in the moral validity of the legal codes they do not cross these lines. But do people in fact know the lines that legal codes draw? The fact that severa…
Describing the Person's External Environment
Describing the Person's External Environment
Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment
What motivates a person's desire to punish actors who commit intentional, counternormative harms? Two possible answers are a just deserts motive or a desire to incarcerate the actor so that he cannot be a further danger to society. Research participants in two experiments assigned punishments to actors whose offenses were varied with respect to the moral seriousness of the offense and the likelihood that the perpetrator would commit similar futur…
The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law
Criminal legal codes draw clear lines between permissible and illegal conduct, and the criminal justice system counts on people knowing these lines and governing their conduct accordingly. This is the "ex ante" function of the law; lines are drawn, and because citizens fear punishments or believe in the moral validity of the legal codes they do not cross these lines. But do people in fact know the lines that legal codes draw? The fact that severa…
Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment
One popular justification for punishment is the just deserts rationale: A person deserves punishment proportionate to the moral wrong committed. A competing justification is the deterrence rationale: Punishing an offender reduces the frequency and likelihood of future offenses. The authors examined the motivation underlying laypeople's use of punishment for prototypical wrongs. Study 1 (N = 336) revealed high sensitivity to factors uniquely assoc…
The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment
Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice
The fine line between interrogation and retribution
The paradoxical consequences of revenge
People expect to reap hedonic rewards when they punish an offender, but in at least some instances, revenge has hedonic consequences that are precisely the opposite of what people expect. Three studies showed that (a) one reason for this is that people who punish continue to ruminate about the offender, whereas those who do not punish "move on" and think less about the offender, and (b) people fail to appreciate the different affective consequenc…
On Justifying Punishment
The Art of Laboratory Experimentation
2.1 Why do Laboratory Experiments? 2.2 Planning and Conducting a Laboratory Experiment 2.3 Concluding Comments
Cognitive Dissonance
Psychology (10 obras) · Social Psychology (9 obras) · Criminology (7 obras) · Law (7 obras) · Political science (7 obras) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 obras) · Economic Justice (4 obras) · Law (4 obras) · Punishment (psychology) (4 obras) · Retributive justice (4 obras)