Isabelle Boutron

Dados Biográficos

ID3092983
NOMEIsabelle Boutron
PRENOMESIsabelle
SOBRENOMEBoutron
ASSINATURABOUTRON I
AFILIAÇÕESInserm
ORCID0000-0002-5263-6241
VERIFICADOSim
TOTAL DE OBRAS18
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES7
TOTAL COMO AUTOR18
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO2008
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2022
ÍNDICE H2

  • A declaração PRISMA 2020

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLERevista Panamericana de Salud…2022

    A declaração dos Principais Itens para Relatar Revisões Sistemáticas e Meta-análises (PRISMA), publicada em 2009, foi desenvolvida para ajudar revisores sistemáticos a relatar de forma transparente por que a revisão foi feita, os métodos empregados e o que os autores encontraram. Na última década, os avanços na metodologia e terminologia de revisões sistemáticas exigiram a atualização da diretriz. A declaração PRISMA 2020 substitui a declaração d…

  • Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEJournal of Clinical Epidemiology2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEPLoS Medicine2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEJournal of Clinical Epidemiology2021

  • Declaración PRISMA 2020

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLERevista Española de Cardiología…2021

    La declaración PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses), publicada en 2009, se diseñó para ayudar a los autores de revisiones sistemáticas a documentar de manera transparente el porqué de la revisión, qué hicieron los autores y qué encontraron. Durante la última década, ha habido muchos avances en la metodología y terminología de las revisiones sistemáticas, lo que ha requerido una actualización de esta guía. La…

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of Surgery2021

  • PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, David Moher et al.ARTICLEBMJ2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLEBMJ2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open AccessMatthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.ARTICLESystematic Reviews2021

  • Day-to-day discovery of preprint–publication links

    Open AccessGuillaume Cabanac, Theodora Oikonomidi et al.ARTICLEScientometrics2021

    Preprints promote the open and fast communication of non-peer reviewed work. Once a preprint is published in a peer-reviewed venue, the preprint server updates its web page: a prominent hyperlink leading to the newly published work is added. Linking preprints to publications is of utmost importance as it provides readers with the latest version of a now certified work. Yet leading preprint servers fail to identify all existing preprint–publicatio…

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Matthew J Page, Joanne Mckenzie et al.PREPRINT2020

    Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did and what they found. Over the last decade, there have been many advances in systematic review methodology and terminology, which have necessitated an update to the guideline.Objectives: To develop the PRISMA 2020 statem…

  • RoB 2

    Open AccessJonathan Sterne, Jelena Savović et al.ARTICLEBMJ2019

    Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We updated the tool to respond to developments in understanding how bias arises in randomised trials, and to address user feedback on and limitations of the original tool.

  • Front-of-Pack Labeling and the Nutritional Quality of Students’ Food Purchases

    Manon Egnell, Isabelle Boutron et al.ARTICLEAmerican Journal of Public Health2019Citada por: 3Referências: 26

    Objectives. To assess the effects of the Nutri-Score label (relative to the Reference Intakes label or no label) on the nutritional quality of students’ food purchases. Methods. A 3-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in France in 2017; 2907 participants were randomized into 1 of the 3 study arms (Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes, no label) and invited to purchase groceries from an experimental Web-based supermarket. The main outcome was …

  • Robins-I

    Open AccessJonathan Sterne, Jonathan AC Sterne et al.ARTICLEBMJ2016

    Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions”), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that d…

  • The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions

    Brian Hutton, Georgia Salanti et al.ARTICLEAnnals of Internal Medicine2015

  • Better reporting of interventions

    Open AccessTom Hoffmann, T C Hoffmann et al.ARTICLEBMJ2014

    Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot replicate or build on research findings. The quality of description of interventions in publications, however, is remarkably poor. To improve the completeness of reporting, and ultimately the replicability, of interventions, an international group of experts and stakeh…

  • Reporting Methodological Items in Randomized Experiments in Political Science

    Open AccessIsabelle Boutron, Peter John et al.ARTICLEThe Annals of the American…2010Citada por: 4Referências: 34

    This article discusses the arguments for using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) procedures in political science field experiments, with the aim of improving the clarity and transparency of research work and reducing the possibility of bias. The article reviews the background to CONSORT, which is increasingly required for carrying out and reporting trials in healthcare and other disciplines. It sets out the main elements of…

  • Extending the Consort Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment

    Open AccessIsabelle Boutron, David Moher et al.ARTICLEAnnals of Internal Medicine2008

    Adequate reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) is necessary to allow accurate critical appraisal of the validity and applicability of the results. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement, a 22-item checklist and flow diagram, is intended to address this problem by improving the reporting of RCTs. However, some specific issues that apply to trials of nonpharmacologic treatments (for example, surgery, technica…