Peter C Gøtzsche

Dados Biográficos

ID3483592
NOMEPeter C Gøtzsche
PRENOMESPeter C
SOBRENOMEGøtzsche
ASSINATURAGØTZSCHE P C
AFILIAÇÕESCochrane
ORCID0000-0002-2108-7016
VERIFICADOSim
TOTAL DE OBRAS23
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES0
TOTAL COMO AUTOR23
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO1999
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2019
ÍNDICE H0

  • Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime

    Peter C Gøtzsche, Peter Gotzsche et al.BOOKDeadly Medicines and Organised…2019

    PRESCRIPTION DRUGS ARE THE THIRD LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH AFTER HEART DISEASE AND CANCER. In his latest ground-breaking book, Peter C Gotzsche exposes the pharmaceutical industries and their charade of fraudulent behaviour, both in research and marketing where the morally repugnant disregard for human lives is the norm. He convincingly draws close co

  • The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions

    Brian Hutton, Georgia Salanti et al.ARTICLEAnnals of Internal Medicine2015

  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement

    Open AccessErik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of Surgery2014

    Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cove…

  • Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)

    Open AccessJan P Vandenbroucke, Erik Von Elm et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of Surgery2014

    Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) …

  • SPIRIT 2013 Statement

    Open AccessAn-Wen Chan, An‐Wen Chan et al.ARTICLEAnnals of Internal Medicine2013

    The protocol of a clinical trial serves as the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting, and appraisal. However, trial protocols and existing protocol guidelines vary greatly in content and quality. This article describes the systematic development and scope of SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) 2013, a guideline for the minimum content of a clinical trial protocol.The 33-item SPIRIT checklist app…

  • SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration

    Open AccessA-W Chan, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al.ARTICLEBMJ2013

    High quality protocols facilitate proper conduct, reporting, and external review of clinical trials. However, the completeness of trial protocols is often inadequate. To help improve the content and quality of protocols, an international group of stakeholders developed the SPIRIT 2013 Statement (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials). The SPIRIT Statement provides guidance in the form of a checklist of recommended ite…

  • Consort 2010 explanation and elaboration

    Open AccessDavid Moher, Sally Hopewell et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal of Surgery2012

    Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial findings nor extract information for systematic reviews. Recent methodological analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which …

  • The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

    Open AccessJulian P T Higgins, D G Altman et al.ARTICLEBMJ2011

    Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate

  • Consort 2010 Explanation and Elaboration

    Open AccessDavid Moher, Sally Hopewell et al.ARTICLEBMJ2010

    Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial findings nor extract information for systematic reviews. Recent methodological analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which …

  • The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions

    Open AccessAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman et al.ARTICLEAnnals of Internal Medicine2009

  • The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions

    Open AccessAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman et al.ARTICLEPLoS Medicine2009

  • The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions

    Open AccessAlessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman et al.ARTICLEJournal of Clinical Epidemiology2009

  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement

    Open AccessErik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.ARTICLEBulletin of the World Health…2007

    Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cove…

  • Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)

    Open AccessJan P Vandenbroucke, Erik Von Elm et al.ARTICLEAnnals of Internal Medicine2007

    Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) …

  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement

    Open AccessErik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.ARTICLEAnnals of Internal Medicine2007

    Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cove…

  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement

    Erik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.ARTICLEEpidemiology2007

    Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cove…

  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement

    Open AccessErik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.ARTICLEPLoS Medicine2007

    Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cove…

  • Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)

    Jan P Vandenbroucke, Erik Von Elm et al.ARTICLEEpidemiology2007

    Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) …

  • Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement

    Open AccessErik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.ARTICLEBMJ2007

    Poor reporting of research hampers assessment and makes it less useful. An international group of methodologists, researchers, and journal editors sets out guidelines to improve reports of observational studies

  • Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)

    Open AccessJan P Vandenbroucke, Erik Von Elm et al.ARTICLEPLoS Medicine2007

    Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) …

  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement

    Open AccessErik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.ARTICLEThe Lancet2007

  • The Revised Consort Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials

    Open AccessDouglas G Altman, Kenneth F Schulz et al.ARTICLEAnnals of Internal Medicine2001

    Overwhelming evidence now indicates that the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) is less than optimal. Recent methodologic analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which boast the elimination of systematic error as their primary hallmark. Systematic error in RCTs reflects poor science, and poor sci…

  • Meta-analysis of resting metabolic rate in formerly obese subjects

    Open AccessArne Astrup, Peter C Gøtzsche et al.ARTICLE1999Referências: 23