Jonathan R Cole
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 3611079 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Jonathan R Cole |
| PRENOMES | Jonathan R |
| SOBRENOME | Cole |
| ASSINATURA | COLE J R |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Columbia University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4902-616X |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 33 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 308 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 33 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1967 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2024 |
| ÍNDICE H | 8 |
Smoother Pebbles
Smoother Pebbles presents a collection of essays authored or coauthored by Jonathan R. Cole, a leading Columbia Program figure, that trace the development and institutionalization of the sociology of science.
The Emergence of A Scientific Specialty
The sociology of science is curiously self-exemplifying. As a scientific specialty, it exhibits many of the social patterns its own practitioners study in other contexts, making it a convenient site for sociological study of emerging specialties. Sociologists of knowledge have also not shown much interest in questions about the growth of scientific knowledge. They have occupied themselves primarily with inquiries into the social and existential b…
Academic Freedom as an Indicator of a Liberal Democracy
Keywords: academic freedomliberal democracyanti-intellectualismilliberal democracyScholars at RiskUnited States
The Future of Universities and the Fate of Free Inquiry and Academic Freedom
This paper suggests that the time for free inquiry and academic freedom at European universities has rarely been better than at present, that debates and results arising from independent scientific discourse have rarely had better chances of blossoming and evoking a response than in the time in which we now live, and that the basic rules of university and scholarly work in general are, by no means, seriously threatened in Europe, in comparison to…
Defending Academic Freedom and Free Inquiry
This paper focuses our attention on a few principles that guide great universities. I want to suggest that the United States has not distinguished itself particularly well in preventing episodes of repression and attempts to silence dissent at universities, nor has it produced an extraordinary number of courageous leaders over the past seventy-five years who have come forward to defend the principles of academic freedom. While the US has never re…
Universities under Conditions of Duress
Shlomo Avineri, Richard Bernstein, Jonathan R. Cole, Hans-Peter Kruger, and Alan Ryan Universities under Conditions of Duress: Question and Answer Session RICHARD BERNSTEIN: Iunderstand Socrates and Kant. Couldyou explainwhy the Protestant God is the thirdpresiding deity ofthe liberal arts college? A L A N R Y A N : Because the Protestant God is the one that said every man was to be his own priest, was to read the Bible for himself, and was to ma…
Academic freedom under fire
The Outer Circle
Women in Science
The paradox of individual particularism and institutional universalism
Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensus
Hargens has made a significant contribution to our continuing attempt to understand the cognitive and social differences between scientific disciplines. A primary issue is to what extent does the level of cognitive consensus in the natural and the social sciences differ? Hargens (1975) and most others (e.g., Kuhn 1970, Lodahl and Gordon 1972, Price 1970, Storer 1967, and Zuckerman and Merton 1971; 1973) have long advocated the accepted assumption…
The Wages of Writing
Marriage, Motherhood and Research Performance in Science
Economic and Social Aspects of the Literary Situation
SURVEYS of public opinion have repeatedly found that the occupation of author is held in comparatively high esteem by the American public, ranking among the top 10 percent of all occupations (Reiss, et al., 1961). Since the prestige of an occupation is notably associated with the typical income derived from it (Blau and Duncan, 1967; Featherman and Hauser, 1978; Treiman, 1977), the prestige accorded authors might therefore suggest that Americans …
Fair Science
Social Stratification in Science
Chance and Consensus in Peer Review
An experiment in which 150 proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation were evaluated independently by a new set of reviewers indicates that getting a research grant depends to a significant extent on chance. The degree of disagreement within the population of eligible reviewers is such that whether or not a proposal is funded depends in a large proportion of cases upon which reviewers happen to be selected for it. No evidence of syste…
Fair Science
Competence is Not Enough
The Reputations of American Medical Schools
Journal Article The Reputations of American Medical Schools Get access Jonathan R. Cole, Jonathan R. Cole Columbia University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar James A. Lipton James A. Lipton Columbia University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, Volume 55, Issue 3, March 1977, Pages 662–684, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/55.3.662 Published: 01 March 1977
The Sociology of Science
Social Stratification in Science
Women in American science
Social Stratification in Science
Social Stratification in Science
Scientific Output and Recognition
Social Stratification in Science
Social Stratification in Science
Women in American science
Visibility and the Structural Bases of Awareness of Scientific Research
Academic Freedom as an Indicator of a Liberal Democracy
Keywords: academic freedomliberal democracyanti-intellectualismilliberal democracyScholars at RiskUnited States
Academic freedom under fire
Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensus
Hargens has made a significant contribution to our continuing attempt to understand the cognitive and social differences between scientific disciplines. A primary issue is to what extent does the level of cognitive consensus in the natural and the social sciences differ? Hargens (1975) and most others (e.g., Kuhn 1970, Lodahl and Gordon 1972, Price 1970, Storer 1967, and Zuckerman and Merton 1971; 1973) have long advocated the accepted assumption…
The Reputations of American Medical Schools
Journal Article The Reputations of American Medical Schools Get access Jonathan R. Cole, Jonathan R. Cole Columbia University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar James A. Lipton James A. Lipton Columbia University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, Volume 55, Issue 3, March 1977, Pages 662–684, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/55.3.662 Published: 01 March 1977
Patterns of Intellectual Influence in Scientific Research
The Social Sciences
Women in Science
Economic and Social Aspects of the Literary Situation
SURVEYS of public opinion have repeatedly found that the occupation of author is held in comparatively high esteem by the American public, ranking among the top 10 percent of all occupations (Reiss, et al., 1961). Since the prestige of an occupation is notably associated with the typical income derived from it (Blau and Duncan, 1967; Featherman and Hauser, 1978; Treiman, 1977), the prestige accorded authors might therefore suggest that Americans …
Fair Science
The paradox of individual particularism and institutional universalism
Social Stratification in Science
Scientific Output and Recognition
Visibility and the Structural Bases of Awareness of Scientific Research
Patterns of Intellectual Influence in Scientific Research
Constructing Social Theories. Arthur L. Stinchcombe Essays in Sociological Explanation. Neil J. Smelser Politics of Social Research
The Social Sciences
TECHNOLOGY AND CULTURE Book Reviews 153 been eroded away. The Matupi have readily accepted numerous inno vations and have greatly widened their allegiances among neighboring groups, but they have manifested a persistent determination to remain Matupi, that is, to assert their own distinctiveness and retain a unique identity. This book maintains the high quality of scholarship which Epstein set in his earlier works on Africa. „ _ * Ron Crocombe* …
The Social Sciences
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos , Alan Musgrave
Social Stratification in Science
Black Students in Protest
Social Stratification in Science
Women in American science
Social Stratification in Science
The Sociology of Science
The Reputations of American Medical Schools
Journal Article The Reputations of American Medical Schools Get access Jonathan R. Cole, Jonathan R. Cole Columbia University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar James A. Lipton James A. Lipton Columbia University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, Volume 55, Issue 3, March 1977, Pages 662–684, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/55.3.662 Published: 01 March 1977
Fair Science
Competence is Not Enough
Social Stratification in Science
Chance and Consensus in Peer Review
An experiment in which 150 proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation were evaluated independently by a new set of reviewers indicates that getting a research grant depends to a significant extent on chance. The degree of disagreement within the population of eligible reviewers is such that whether or not a proposal is funded depends in a large proportion of cases upon which reviewers happen to be selected for it. No evidence of syste…
Fair Science
Economic and Social Aspects of the Literary Situation
SURVEYS of public opinion have repeatedly found that the occupation of author is held in comparatively high esteem by the American public, ranking among the top 10 percent of all occupations (Reiss, et al., 1961). Since the prestige of an occupation is notably associated with the typical income derived from it (Blau and Duncan, 1967; Featherman and Hauser, 1978; Treiman, 1977), the prestige accorded authors might therefore suggest that Americans …
Marriage, Motherhood and Research Performance in Science
Do Journal Rejection Rates Index Consensus
Hargens has made a significant contribution to our continuing attempt to understand the cognitive and social differences between scientific disciplines. A primary issue is to what extent does the level of cognitive consensus in the natural and the social sciences differ? Hargens (1975) and most others (e.g., Kuhn 1970, Lodahl and Gordon 1972, Price 1970, Storer 1967, and Zuckerman and Merton 1971; 1973) have long advocated the accepted assumption…
The Wages of Writing
The paradox of individual particularism and institutional universalism
Women in Science
Sociology (21 obras) · Political science (17 obras) · Law (13 obras) · Psychology (12 obras) · Philosophy (9 obras) · Social science (7 obras) · Computer Science (6 obras) · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (6 obras) · Epistemology (6 obras) · Politics (6 obras)