Karen O''Connor
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 3846495 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Karen O''Connor |
| PRENOMES | Karen |
| SOBRENOME | O''Connor |
| ASSINATURA | CONNOR K O |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 7 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 60 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 7 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1983 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2010 |
| ÍNDICE H | 3 |
Judging Alone
The word I would use to describe my position on the bench is lonely.” So said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2007, when asked to comment on her position on the U.S. Supreme Court after the resignation of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. After a year as the Court's only woman, Ginsburg had begun to feel the solitude that comes from judging alone, being the Court's only descriptive and often symbolic representative of women's interests. Ginsburg's posi…
Backgrounds, motivations and interests
Justice Sandra day O'connor and the supreme court's reaction to its first female member
Toward a theoretical model of countermovements and constitutional change
Friends as Foes
Scholars have long recognized that interest groups realize the importance of the courts as policymakers and as vehicles of social and political change. We examined the amicus curiae participation of the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Effective Law Enforcement in criminal cases before the Burger Court from 1969–1982. We found that AELE, a conservative law‐enforcement organization, has been the most successful interest group as pa…
Bridging the Gap Between Congress and the Supreme Court
Karen O'Connor, Lee Epstein, Bridging the Gap between Congress and the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and the Erosion of the American Rule Governing Awards of Attorneys' Fees, The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 2 (Jun., 1985), pp. 238-249
The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation
Research on interest group litigation long has focused almost exclusively on liberal groups. This examination undertakes an analysis of conservative group use of the courts during the Burger Court era. Contrary to widespread expectation, conservative groups litigate in a strategic fashion but do so through the more limited form of participation--the amicus curiae brief--which they view as an effective lobbying device. In fact, conservative groups…
The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation
Research on interest group litigation long has focused almost exclusively on liberal groups. This examination undertakes an analysis of conservative group use of the courts during the Burger Court era. Contrary to widespread expectation, conservative groups litigate in a strategic fashion but do so through the more limited form of participation--the amicus curiae brief--which they view as an effective lobbying device. In fact, conservative groups…
Friends as Foes
Scholars have long recognized that interest groups realize the importance of the courts as policymakers and as vehicles of social and political change. We examined the amicus curiae participation of the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Effective Law Enforcement in criminal cases before the Burger Court from 1969–1982. We found that AELE, a conservative law‐enforcement organization, has been the most successful interest group as pa…
Backgrounds, motivations and interests
Judging Alone
The word I would use to describe my position on the bench is lonely.” So said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2007, when asked to comment on her position on the U.S. Supreme Court after the resignation of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. After a year as the Court's only woman, Ginsburg had begun to feel the solitude that comes from judging alone, being the Court's only descriptive and often symbolic representative of women's interests. Ginsburg's posi…
Bridging the Gap Between Congress and the Supreme Court
Karen O'Connor, Lee Epstein, Bridging the Gap between Congress and the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and the Erosion of the American Rule Governing Awards of Attorneys' Fees, The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 2 (Jun., 1985), pp. 238-249
Justice Sandra day O'connor and the supreme court's reaction to its first female member
The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation
Research on interest group litigation long has focused almost exclusively on liberal groups. This examination undertakes an analysis of conservative group use of the courts during the Burger Court era. Contrary to widespread expectation, conservative groups litigate in a strategic fashion but do so through the more limited form of participation--the amicus curiae brief--which they view as an effective lobbying device. In fact, conservative groups…
Bridging the Gap Between Congress and the Supreme Court
Karen O'Connor, Lee Epstein, Bridging the Gap between Congress and the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and the Erosion of the American Rule Governing Awards of Attorneys' Fees, The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 2 (Jun., 1985), pp. 238-249
Friends as Foes
Scholars have long recognized that interest groups realize the importance of the courts as policymakers and as vehicles of social and political change. We examined the amicus curiae participation of the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Effective Law Enforcement in criminal cases before the Burger Court from 1969–1982. We found that AELE, a conservative law‐enforcement organization, has been the most successful interest group as pa…
Toward a theoretical model of countermovements and constitutional change
Justice Sandra day O'connor and the supreme court's reaction to its first female member
Backgrounds, motivations and interests
Judging Alone
The word I would use to describe my position on the bench is lonely.” So said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2007, when asked to comment on her position on the U.S. Supreme Court after the resignation of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. After a year as the Court's only woman, Ginsburg had begun to feel the solitude that comes from judging alone, being the Court's only descriptive and often symbolic representative of women's interests. Ginsburg's posi…
Political science (7 obras) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 obras) · Law (5 obras) · Law (4 obras) · Sociology (4 obras) · Supreme court (4 obras) · Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 obras) · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (3 obras) · Politics (3 obras) · Economic Justice (2 obras)