Peter Urbach
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 384858 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Peter Urbach |
| PRENOMES | Peter |
| SOBRENOME | Urbach |
| ASSINATURA | URBACH P |
| AFILIAÇÕES | London School of Economics and Political Science |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 17 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 39 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 17 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1974 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2024 |
| ÍNDICE H | 3 |
In Memoriam
An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Reply to David Papineau
Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. John Earman
Regression Analysis
A Reply to Mayo's Criticisms of Urbach's “Randomization and the Design of Experiments”
Mayo (1987) sought to discredit Urbach's (1985) arguments against randomization as a universal requirement in clinical and agricultural trials. The present reply rebuts Mayo's criticisms
Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science
Journal Article Book Reviews Get access Francis Bacon’s Philosophy of Science. By Peter Urbach. (Lasalle, Illinois: Open Court, 1987. Pp. 209. Price £8.95.) Michael Williams Michael Williams Brasenose College, Oxford, and Northwestern University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 39, Issue 156, July 1989, Pages 357–360, https://doi.org/10.2307/2220177 Published: 01 July 198…
What is a Law of Nature? A Humean Answer
Randomization and the Design of Experiments
In clinical and agricultural trials, there is the danger that an experimental outcome appears to arise from the causal process or treatment one is interested in when, in reality, it was produced by some extraneous variation in the experimental conditions. The remedy prescribed by classical statisticians involves the procedure of randomization, whose effectiveness and appropriateness is criticized. An alternative, Bayesian analysis of experimental…
Intimations of Similarity
Science, Revolution and Discontinuity
Science and Society
Francis Bacon as a Precursor to Popper
Reasoning and Method in Economics
Social Propensities
Is Any of Popper's Arguments Against Historicism Valid
Progress and Degeneration in the ‘IQ Debate’ (I)
Progress and Degeneration in the ‘IQ Debate’ (II)
Randomization and the Design of Experiments
In clinical and agricultural trials, there is the danger that an experimental outcome appears to arise from the causal process or treatment one is interested in when, in reality, it was produced by some extraneous variation in the experimental conditions. The remedy prescribed by classical statisticians involves the procedure of randomization, whose effectiveness and appropriateness is criticized. An alternative, Bayesian analysis of experimental…
Intimations of Similarity
Progress and Degeneration in the ‘IQ Debate’ (I)
Regression Analysis
Francis Bacon as a Precursor to Popper
Is Any of Popper's Arguments Against Historicism Valid
Reply to David Papineau
What is a Law of Nature? A Humean Answer
Progress and Degeneration in the ‘IQ Debate’ (II)
Progress and Degeneration in the ‘IQ Debate’ (I)
Progress and Degeneration in the ‘IQ Debate’ (II)
Is Any of Popper's Arguments Against Historicism Valid
Social Propensities
Reasoning and Method in Economics
Francis Bacon as a Precursor to Popper
Intimations of Similarity
Science, Revolution and Discontinuity
Science and Society
Randomization and the Design of Experiments
In clinical and agricultural trials, there is the danger that an experimental outcome appears to arise from the causal process or treatment one is interested in when, in reality, it was produced by some extraneous variation in the experimental conditions. The remedy prescribed by classical statisticians involves the procedure of randomization, whose effectiveness and appropriateness is criticized. An alternative, Bayesian analysis of experimental…
What is a Law of Nature? A Humean Answer
Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science
Journal Article Book Reviews Get access Francis Bacon’s Philosophy of Science. By Peter Urbach. (Lasalle, Illinois: Open Court, 1987. Pp. 209. Price £8.95.) Michael Williams Michael Williams Brasenose College, Oxford, and Northwestern University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 39, Issue 156, July 1989, Pages 357–360, https://doi.org/10.2307/2220177 Published: 01 July 198…
A Reply to Mayo's Criticisms of Urbach's “Randomization and the Design of Experiments”
Mayo (1987) sought to discredit Urbach's (1985) arguments against randomization as a universal requirement in clinical and agricultural trials. The present reply rebuts Mayo's criticisms
Regression Analysis
Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. John Earman
Reply to David Papineau
In Memoriam
An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Philosophy (15 obras) · Epistemology (12 obras) · Computer Science (10 obras) · Library science (7 obras) · Philosophy and History of Science (6 obras) · Philosophy of science (5 obras) · Download (4 obras) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 obras) · Sociology (4 obras) · Art history (3 obras)