Daniel Groll
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 3873290 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Daniel Groll |
| PRENOMES | Daniel |
| SOBRENOME | Groll |
| ASSINATURA | GROLL D |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Carleton College |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7208-7449 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 9 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 3 |
| OBRAS COMO AUTOR | 9 |
| OBRAS COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2010 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2024 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
The Open Donor View and Procreative Beneficence
This letter responds to the article “What Do Prospective Parents Owe to Their Children?,” by Abigail Levin, in the March‐April 2024 issue of the Hastings Center Report
Walking a Tightrope
Naturalizing parenthood
Cases of non-traditional family-making offer a rich seam for thinking about normative parenthood. Gamete donors are genetically related to the resulting offspring but are not thought to be normative parents. Gestational surrogates are also typically not thought to be normative parents, despite having gestated a child. Adoptive parents are typically thought to be normative parents even though they are neither genetically nor gestationally related …
Paternalism and rights
Are there any deep or systematic connections between paternalism and people’s rights? While it is easy to think of instances of paternalism that violate the paternalized subject’s rights (e.g., stealing my car keys for my own good), it appears equally easy to think of cases of paternalism that involve no rights violation (hiding your car keys for my own good). This seems to suggest that the answer to the opening question is “no.” The main goal in…
Medical Paternalism - Part 2
Medical clinicians - doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners etc. - are charged to act for the good of their patients. But not all ways of acting for a patient's good are on par: some are paternalistic; others are not. What does it mean to act paternalistically, both in general and specifically in a medical context? And when, if ever, is it permissible for a clinician to act paternalistically? In Medical Paternalism Part 1, I answered the first ques…
Medical Paternalism - Part 1
Medical clinicians - doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners etc. - are charged to act for the good of their patients. But not all ways of acting for a patient's good are on par: some are paternalistic; others are not. What does it mean to act paternalistically, both in general and specifically in a medical context? And when, if ever, is it permissible for a clinician to act paternalistically?This paper deals with the first question, with a special …
Paternalism, Respect, and the Will
In general, we think that when it comes to the good of another, we respect that person’s will by acting in accordance with what he wills because he wills it. I argue that this is not necessarily true. When it comes to the good of another person, it is possible to disrespect that person’s will while acting in accordance with what he wills because he wills it. Seeing how this is so, I argue, enables us to clarify the distinct roles that the wills o…
What Health Care Providers Know
Some assume that respecting patient autonomy means clinicians should refrain from expressing opinions about what's in a patient's best interests. But depending on the kind of medical decision the patient is making, a clinician may have expertise vital to the patient's best interests—and even if she doesn't, she may still know what is best
Peter Singer Under Fire
Medical Paternalism - Part 1
Medical clinicians - doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners etc. - are charged to act for the good of their patients. But not all ways of acting for a patient's good are on par: some are paternalistic; others are not. What does it mean to act paternalistically, both in general and specifically in a medical context? And when, if ever, is it permissible for a clinician to act paternalistically?This paper deals with the first question, with a special …
Medical Paternalism - Part 2
Medical clinicians - doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners etc. - are charged to act for the good of their patients. But not all ways of acting for a patient's good are on par: some are paternalistic; others are not. What does it mean to act paternalistically, both in general and specifically in a medical context? And when, if ever, is it permissible for a clinician to act paternalistically? In Medical Paternalism Part 1, I answered the first ques…
Peter Singer Under Fire
What Health Care Providers Know
Some assume that respecting patient autonomy means clinicians should refrain from expressing opinions about what's in a patient's best interests. But depending on the kind of medical decision the patient is making, a clinician may have expertise vital to the patient's best interests—and even if she doesn't, she may still know what is best
Paternalism, Respect, and the Will
In general, we think that when it comes to the good of another, we respect that person’s will by acting in accordance with what he wills because he wills it. I argue that this is not necessarily true. When it comes to the good of another person, it is possible to disrespect that person’s will while acting in accordance with what he wills because he wills it. Seeing how this is so, I argue, enables us to clarify the distinct roles that the wills o…
Medical Paternalism - Part 2
Medical clinicians - doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners etc. - are charged to act for the good of their patients. But not all ways of acting for a patient's good are on par: some are paternalistic; others are not. What does it mean to act paternalistically, both in general and specifically in a medical context? And when, if ever, is it permissible for a clinician to act paternalistically? In Medical Paternalism Part 1, I answered the first ques…
Medical Paternalism - Part 1
Medical clinicians - doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners etc. - are charged to act for the good of their patients. But not all ways of acting for a patient's good are on par: some are paternalistic; others are not. What does it mean to act paternalistically, both in general and specifically in a medical context? And when, if ever, is it permissible for a clinician to act paternalistically?This paper deals with the first question, with a special …
Paternalism and rights
Are there any deep or systematic connections between paternalism and people’s rights? While it is easy to think of instances of paternalism that violate the paternalized subject’s rights (e.g., stealing my car keys for my own good), it appears equally easy to think of cases of paternalism that involve no rights violation (hiding your car keys for my own good). This seems to suggest that the answer to the opening question is “no.” The main goal in…
Naturalizing parenthood
Cases of non-traditional family-making offer a rich seam for thinking about normative parenthood. Gamete donors are genetically related to the resulting offspring but are not thought to be normative parents. Gestational surrogates are also typically not thought to be normative parents, despite having gestated a child. Adoptive parents are typically thought to be normative parents even though they are neither genetically nor gestationally related …
Walking a Tightrope
The Open Donor View and Procreative Beneficence
This letter responds to the article “What Do Prospective Parents Owe to Their Children?,” by Abigail Levin, in the March‐April 2024 issue of the Hastings Center Report
Law (6 obras) · Political science (6 obras) · Philosophy (5 obras) · Psychology (5 obras) · Autonomy (4 obras) · Paternalism (4 obras) · Sociology (4 obras) · Beneficence (3 obras) · Ethics in medical practice (3 obras) · Law and economics (3 obras)