Luciano Venezia
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 439799 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Luciano Venezia |
| PRENOMES | Luciano |
| SOBRENOME | Venezia |
| ASSINATURA | VENEZIA L |
| AFILIAÇÕES | National University of Quilmes |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7647-7775 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 11 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 0 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 11 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2009 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 0 |
Self-Defense Against Conditional Threats
Órdenes moralmente redundantes
En este ensayo desarrollo la noción de orden moralmente redundante y muestro diferentes maneras en que una orden de este tipo puede ser normativamente relevante
Locke on Conditional Threats
John Locke says that a victim is permitted to kill a Conditional Threat in self‐defense. Yet, David Rodin argues that killing is disproportionate to the harm averted and is therefore impermissible. But Rodin mischaracterizes the situation faced by a Conditional Threat victim as analyzed by Locke. In this article, I aim to provide a more satisfactory reading of Locke on self‐defense against Conditional Threats, particularly of the thesis that kill…
Unjust combatants, special authority, and “transferred responsibility”
Historia de la filosofía política
In this paper I outline three kinds of analysis of classical texts in the history of political philosophy, which I call “Reconstruction”, “Illustration” and “Use”. I briefly develop each of these methodologies, relying especially on my own work on John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Finally, I put forward some thoughts about the value of the different kinds of approach
Mistaken Authority and Obligation
Massimo Renzo argues that, as long as it is acting in good faith, an authority can issue orders that require subjects to act in ways that are morally wrong and still be acting within the scope of its jurisdiction, so that the orders are binding. This, however, is incorrect. If the authority is permitted to issue an order, it is acting within the scope of its jurisdiction and so the order creates an obligation. But if the authority is not permitte…
Hobbes on Legal Authority and Political Obligation
Lloyd’s Orthodoxy
In this paper, I will show that Lloyd’s reading of Hobbes’s account of political obedience is substantially similar to the mainstream philosophical interpretation. In particular, both include an “orthodox” interpretation of Hobbes’s political and legal philosophy. On the orthodox interpretation, the reasonableness of a choice is determined by the “weight” or “balance” of reasons. Subjects have reason to obey the law because so acting best satisfi…
Crucial Evidence
In this paper, I will introduce the notions of crucial argument and crucial evidence in the philosophy of intellectual history (broadly construed, including the history of political thought). I will use these concepts and take sides in an important controversy in Hobbes studies, namely whether Hobbes holds a prudential or a deontological theory of contractual obligation. Though there is textual evidence for both readings, I will argue that there …
Hobbes’ two accounts of law and the structure of reasons for political obedience
Thomas Hobbes’s political theory contains conceptual theses on law, including an analysis of the way legal requirements affect practical reasoning. However, Hobbes’ account of law and the structure of reasons for political obedience is extremely ambiguous. In this paper, I show that Hobbes develops not one but two different accounts. Also, I argue that the two theories are in tension, something that Hobbes himself seems to recognize to some exten…
Internalismo moral y justicia global
En este trabajo caracterizo y evalúo un argumento que David Miller formula contra la concepción cosmopolita de la justicia internacional. Miller afirma que la justicia cosmopolita es excesivamente demandante y consiguientemente sólo puede ser cumplida por «héroes» pero no por personas regulares. Sobre la base de estas consideraciones, Miller asegura que los principios de justicia distributiva sólo pueden tener un ámbito de aplicación nacional y q…
Sem obras proeminentes nesta página.
Internalismo moral y justicia global
En este trabajo caracterizo y evalúo un argumento que David Miller formula contra la concepción cosmopolita de la justicia internacional. Miller afirma que la justicia cosmopolita es excesivamente demandante y consiguientemente sólo puede ser cumplida por «héroes» pero no por personas regulares. Sobre la base de estas consideraciones, Miller asegura que los principios de justicia distributiva sólo pueden tener un ámbito de aplicación nacional y q…
Lloyd’s Orthodoxy
In this paper, I will show that Lloyd’s reading of Hobbes’s account of political obedience is substantially similar to the mainstream philosophical interpretation. In particular, both include an “orthodox” interpretation of Hobbes’s political and legal philosophy. On the orthodox interpretation, the reasonableness of a choice is determined by the “weight” or “balance” of reasons. Subjects have reason to obey the law because so acting best satisfi…
Crucial Evidence
In this paper, I will introduce the notions of crucial argument and crucial evidence in the philosophy of intellectual history (broadly construed, including the history of political thought). I will use these concepts and take sides in an important controversy in Hobbes studies, namely whether Hobbes holds a prudential or a deontological theory of contractual obligation. Though there is textual evidence for both readings, I will argue that there …
Hobbes’ two accounts of law and the structure of reasons for political obedience
Thomas Hobbes’s political theory contains conceptual theses on law, including an analysis of the way legal requirements affect practical reasoning. However, Hobbes’ account of law and the structure of reasons for political obedience is extremely ambiguous. In this paper, I show that Hobbes develops not one but two different accounts. Also, I argue that the two theories are in tension, something that Hobbes himself seems to recognize to some exten…
Hobbes on Legal Authority and Political Obligation
Historia de la filosofía política
In this paper I outline three kinds of analysis of classical texts in the history of political philosophy, which I call “Reconstruction”, “Illustration” and “Use”. I briefly develop each of these methodologies, relying especially on my own work on John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Finally, I put forward some thoughts about the value of the different kinds of approach
Mistaken Authority and Obligation
Massimo Renzo argues that, as long as it is acting in good faith, an authority can issue orders that require subjects to act in ways that are morally wrong and still be acting within the scope of its jurisdiction, so that the orders are binding. This, however, is incorrect. If the authority is permitted to issue an order, it is acting within the scope of its jurisdiction and so the order creates an obligation. But if the authority is not permitte…
Locke on Conditional Threats
John Locke says that a victim is permitted to kill a Conditional Threat in self‐defense. Yet, David Rodin argues that killing is disproportionate to the harm averted and is therefore impermissible. But Rodin mischaracterizes the situation faced by a Conditional Threat victim as analyzed by Locke. In this article, I aim to provide a more satisfactory reading of Locke on self‐defense against Conditional Threats, particularly of the thesis that kill…
Unjust combatants, special authority, and “transferred responsibility”
Órdenes moralmente redundantes
En este ensayo desarrollo la noción de orden moralmente redundante y muestro diferentes maneras en que una orden de este tipo puede ser normativamente relevante
Self-Defense Against Conditional Threats
Political science (9 obras) · Law (8 obras) · Philosophy (7 obras) · Sociology (7 obras) · Epistemology (6 obras) · Law and economics (6 obras) · War, Ethics, and Justification (6 obras) · Politics (4 obras) · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (4 obras) · Torture, Ethics, and Law (4 obras)