Mark C Navin
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 4450586 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Mark C Navin |
| PRENOMES | Mark C |
| SOBRENOME | Navin |
| ASSINATURA | NAVIN M C |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Oakland University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-8511-6517 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 23 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 6 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 21 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 2 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2010 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
Stronger isn’t always better
Drivers of Noncompliance With Vaccine Mandates—The Interplay Between Distrust, Rationality, Morality, and Social Motivation
COVID‐19 amplified the issue of public resistance to government vaccination programs. Little attention has focused on people's moral reasons for noncompliance, which differ from—but often build upon—the epistemic claims they make about vaccine safety and efficacy, disease severity, and the trustworthiness of government. This study explores the drivers of noncompliance with the COVID‐19 vaccination program in Western Australia, using in‐depth inte…
Principled Conscientious Provision
“Conscientious provision” refers to situations in which clinicians wish to provide legal and professionally accepted treatments prohibited within their (usually Catholic) health care institutions. It mirrors “conscientious objection,” which refers to situations in which clinicians refuse to provide legal and professionally accepted treatments offered within their (usually secular) health care institutions. Conscientious provision is not protected…
Vaccine Rhetorics, by Heidi Yoston Lawrence. Columbus, OH
Making salient ethics arguments about vaccine mandates
Vaccine mandates can take many forms, and different kinds of mandates can implicate an array of values in diverse ways. It follows that good ethics arguments about particular vaccine mandates will attend to the details of individual policies. Furthermore, attention to particular mandate policies—and to attributes of the communities they aim to govern—can also illuminate which ethics arguments may be more salient in particular contexts. If ethicis…
Reciprocity, Vulnerability, and the Moral Significance of Herd Immunity
This article proposes a novel defense of vaccine mandates: such policies are justifiable because they protect the capabilities of individuals who cannot cultivate individual immunity against infection. We begin by considering a nearby argument that has recently enjoyed popularity, which claims individuals have an enforceable obligation to get vaccinated because they have benefited from community protection (often referred to as ‘herd immunity’), …
Education, Inclusion, and Justice
Practising what we preach
The field of clinical bioethics strongly advocates for the use of advance directives to promote patient autonomy, particularly at the end of life. This paper reports a study of clinical bioethicists’ perceptions of the professional consensus about advance directives, as well as their personal advance care planning practices. We find that clinical bioethicists are often sceptical about the value of advance directives, and their personal choices ab…
Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Personnel Who Generally Accept Vaccines
Education, Inclusion, and Justice
How policymakers employ ethical frames to design and introduce new policies
Australian states exclude unvaccinated children from early education and care via ‘No Jab No Play’ policies, but some offer exemptions for the socially disadvantaged. Such mandatory vaccination policies provoke heated arguments about morality and potential downstream impacts, and the politics of which kinds of people get exempted from mandates are often fraught. Synthesising existing frameworks for considering the role of moral principles and rat…
The capacity to designate a surrogate is distinct from decisional capacity
The capacity to designate a surrogate (CDS) is not simply another kind of medical decision-making capacity (DMC). A patient with DMC can express a preference, understand information relevant to that choice, appreciate the significance of that information for their clinical condition, and reason about their choice in light of their goals and values. In contrast, a patient can possess the CDS even if they cannot appreciate their condition or reason…
Capacity for Preferences and Pediatric Assent
In the past thirty to forty years, clinicians and bioethicists have expanded the scope for children’s participation in decision‐making about their medical care, often under the banner of “pediatric assent.” The success of this movement was signaled perhaps most strongly by the creation of American Academy of Pediatrics guidance on pediatric assent in 1995. We agree with the AAP that both the best interests of the child patient and the need to res…
Capacity for Preferences
When a patient lacks decision‐making capacity, then according to standard clinical ethics practice in the United States, the health care team should seek guidance from a surrogate decision‐maker, either previously selected by the patient or appointed by the courts. If there are no surrogates willing or able to exercise substituted judgment, then the team is to choose interventions that promote a patient's best interests. We argue that, even when …
Core Concepts and Contemporary Issues in Privacy
Anna Kirkland. Vaccine Court
Anna Kirkland’s Vaccine Court is the first book-length academic treatment of the US Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), or the “vaccine court.” It explains the development of the vaccine court, presenting this institution as a solution to a set of problems associated with vaccine injury in the context of US health politics. I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in contemporary vaccine hesitancy and refusal, and, more broadly, …
Cooptation or solidarity
Local Food and International Ethics
Globalization and Global Justice
In Globalization and Global Justice, Nicole Hassoun advocates a political philosophy that is deeply informed by empirical work and a utopianism that is constrained by considerations of real-world feasibility. As Hassoun acknowledges, these features are unusual for philosophical work, and she is right to think that the global justice literature needs to be more focused on practical questions and better informed by facts about international politic…
Competing Epistemic Spaces
Recent increases in the rates of parental refusal of routine childhood vaccination have eroded many countries' "herd immunity" to communicable diseases.Some parents who refuse routine childhood vaccines do so because they deny the mainstream medical consensus that vaccines are safe and effective.I argue that one reason these vaccine denialists disagree with vaccine proponents about the reasons in favor of vaccination is because they also disagree…
The Authority of Human Rights Practice
Luck and Oppression
Rescuing Justice and Equality
How policymakers employ ethical frames to design and introduce new policies
Australian states exclude unvaccinated children from early education and care via ‘No Jab No Play’ policies, but some offer exemptions for the socially disadvantaged. Such mandatory vaccination policies provoke heated arguments about morality and potential downstream impacts, and the politics of which kinds of people get exempted from mandates are often fraught. Synthesising existing frameworks for considering the role of moral principles and rat…
Local Food and International Ethics
Rescuing Justice and Equality
The Authority of Human Rights Practice
Luck and Oppression
Competing Epistemic Spaces
Recent increases in the rates of parental refusal of routine childhood vaccination have eroded many countries' "herd immunity" to communicable diseases.Some parents who refuse routine childhood vaccines do so because they deny the mainstream medical consensus that vaccines are safe and effective.I argue that one reason these vaccine denialists disagree with vaccine proponents about the reasons in favor of vaccination is because they also disagree…
Local Food and International Ethics
Globalization and Global Justice
In Globalization and Global Justice, Nicole Hassoun advocates a political philosophy that is deeply informed by empirical work and a utopianism that is constrained by considerations of real-world feasibility. As Hassoun acknowledges, these features are unusual for philosophical work, and she is right to think that the global justice literature needs to be more focused on practical questions and better informed by facts about international politic…
Cooptation or solidarity
Capacity for Preferences
When a patient lacks decision‐making capacity, then according to standard clinical ethics practice in the United States, the health care team should seek guidance from a surrogate decision‐maker, either previously selected by the patient or appointed by the courts. If there are no surrogates willing or able to exercise substituted judgment, then the team is to choose interventions that promote a patient's best interests. We argue that, even when …
Core Concepts and Contemporary Issues in Privacy
Anna Kirkland. Vaccine Court
Anna Kirkland’s Vaccine Court is the first book-length academic treatment of the US Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), or the “vaccine court.” It explains the development of the vaccine court, presenting this institution as a solution to a set of problems associated with vaccine injury in the context of US health politics. I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in contemporary vaccine hesitancy and refusal, and, more broadly, …
Capacity for Preferences and Pediatric Assent
In the past thirty to forty years, clinicians and bioethicists have expanded the scope for children’s participation in decision‐making about their medical care, often under the banner of “pediatric assent.” The success of this movement was signaled perhaps most strongly by the creation of American Academy of Pediatrics guidance on pediatric assent in 1995. We agree with the AAP that both the best interests of the child patient and the need to res…
The capacity to designate a surrogate is distinct from decisional capacity
The capacity to designate a surrogate (CDS) is not simply another kind of medical decision-making capacity (DMC). A patient with DMC can express a preference, understand information relevant to that choice, appreciate the significance of that information for their clinical condition, and reason about their choice in light of their goals and values. In contrast, a patient can possess the CDS even if they cannot appreciate their condition or reason…
Education, Inclusion, and Justice
Practising what we preach
The field of clinical bioethics strongly advocates for the use of advance directives to promote patient autonomy, particularly at the end of life. This paper reports a study of clinical bioethicists’ perceptions of the professional consensus about advance directives, as well as their personal advance care planning practices. We find that clinical bioethicists are often sceptical about the value of advance directives, and their personal choices ab…
Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Personnel Who Generally Accept Vaccines
Education, Inclusion, and Justice
How policymakers employ ethical frames to design and introduce new policies
Australian states exclude unvaccinated children from early education and care via ‘No Jab No Play’ policies, but some offer exemptions for the socially disadvantaged. Such mandatory vaccination policies provoke heated arguments about morality and potential downstream impacts, and the politics of which kinds of people get exempted from mandates are often fraught. Synthesising existing frameworks for considering the role of moral principles and rat…
Vaccine Rhetorics, by Heidi Yoston Lawrence. Columbus, OH
Making salient ethics arguments about vaccine mandates
Vaccine mandates can take many forms, and different kinds of mandates can implicate an array of values in diverse ways. It follows that good ethics arguments about particular vaccine mandates will attend to the details of individual policies. Furthermore, attention to particular mandate policies—and to attributes of the communities they aim to govern—can also illuminate which ethics arguments may be more salient in particular contexts. If ethicis…
Reciprocity, Vulnerability, and the Moral Significance of Herd Immunity
This article proposes a novel defense of vaccine mandates: such policies are justifiable because they protect the capabilities of individuals who cannot cultivate individual immunity against infection. We begin by considering a nearby argument that has recently enjoyed popularity, which claims individuals have an enforceable obligation to get vaccinated because they have benefited from community protection (often referred to as ‘herd immunity’), …
Principled Conscientious Provision
“Conscientious provision” refers to situations in which clinicians wish to provide legal and professionally accepted treatments prohibited within their (usually Catholic) health care institutions. It mirrors “conscientious objection,” which refers to situations in which clinicians refuse to provide legal and professionally accepted treatments offered within their (usually secular) health care institutions. Conscientious provision is not protected…
Stronger isn’t always better
Drivers of Noncompliance With Vaccine Mandates—The Interplay Between Distrust, Rationality, Morality, and Social Motivation
COVID‐19 amplified the issue of public resistance to government vaccination programs. Little attention has focused on people's moral reasons for noncompliance, which differ from—but often build upon—the epistemic claims they make about vaccine safety and efficacy, disease severity, and the trustworthiness of government. This study explores the drivers of noncompliance with the COVID‐19 vaccination program in Western Australia, using in‐depth inte…
Political science (18 obras) · Law (17 obras) · Sociology (14 obras) · Medicine (12 obras) · Epistemology (7 obras) · Law and economics (7 obras) · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (7 obras) · Economics (6 obras) · Politics (6 obras) · Psychology (6 obras)