Stephen Hetherington
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 460297 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Stephen Hetherington |
| PRENOMES | Stephen |
| SOBRENOME | Hetherington |
| ASSINATURA | HETHERINGTON S |
| AFILIAÇÕES | UNSW Sydney |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-9487-8401 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 24 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 19 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 23 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 1 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1991 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2024 |
| ÍNDICE H | 3 |
Knowing that as knowing how
We defend a new, neurocognitive version of the view that knowing that is a form of knowing how and its manifestation. Specifically, we argue that knowing that P is knowing how to represent the fact that P , ground such a representation in the fact that P , use such a representation to guide action with respect to P when needed, store traces of such representations, and exercising the relevant know-how. More precisely, agents acquire knowledge via…
Ajp —100
Knowing Our Limits
I wish that more epistemology books were like Nathan Ballantyne’s Knowing Our Limits. Its literary and historical sensibility; its patiently philosophical sensitivity; its dash of philosophical wis
Some fallibilist knowledge
Knowledge in Contemporary Philosophy
What the Ancients Offer to Contemporary Epistemology
The redundancy problem
Knowledge as Potential for Action
Can we conceive cogently of all knowledge – in particular, all knowledge of truths – as being knowledge-how? This paper provides reasons for thinking not only that is this possible, but that it is conceptually advantageous and suggestive. Those reasons include adaptations of, and responses to, some classic philosophical arguments and ideas, from Descartes, Hume, Peirce, Mill, and Ryle. The paper’s position is thus a practicalism – a kind of pragm…
Knowledge and the Gettier Problem
Edmund Gettier's 1963 verdict about what knowledge is not has become an item of philosophical orthodoxy, accepted by philosophers as a genuine epistemological result. It assures us that - contrary to what Plato and later philosophers have thought - knowledge is not merely a true belief well supported by epistemic justification. But that orthodoxy has generated the Gettier problem - epistemology's continuing struggle to understand how to accommoda…
Knowledge and the Gettier Problem
Technological Knowledge-That As Knowledge-How
Arm’s-length funding of the arts as an expression of laissez-faire
While questions continue to be raised over the continuation, nature and mechanisms of arms’-length funding for the arts, its theoretical foundations within a wider social and economic context remain under-explored. This article argues that the principle on which the arm’s-length relationship is constructed is defined by the concept of laissez-faire. It is this that sets rules for how the public and private spheres interact within a liberal and in…
Concessive knowledge-attributions
The Gettier-illusion
Elusive epistemological justification
Ginet on A Priori Knowledge
Sceptical possibilities? No worries
Confusion
Book Review| October 01 2007 Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge Joseph L. Camp Jr., Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002. x + 246 pp. Stephen Hetherington Stephen Hetherington Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (4): 647–650. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-017 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedI…
Is This a World Where Knowledge Has to Include Justification
If any thesis is all‐but‐universally accepted by contemporary epistemologists, it is justificationism—the thesis that being an instance of knowledge has to include being epistemically justified in some appropriate way. If there is to be any epistemological knowledge about knowledge, a paradigm candidate would seem to be our knowledge that justificationism is true. This is a conception of a way in which knowledge has to be robust . Nevertheless, t…
Knowledge’s Boundary Problem
Knowing (How It Is) That P
Pode o conhecimento de uma dada verdade admitir gradações? Sim, de fato, segundo o gradualismo deste artigo. O artigo introduz o conceito do saber-como que p – isto é, o conceito de saber como é que p. Saber-como que p é claramente gradual – admitindo gradações, dado que se pode saber mais ou menos como é que p. E a vinculação que este artigo faz entre sabercomo que p e saber que p revela que este último tipo de conhecimento também é gradual (mes…
Actually Knowing
Journal Article Actually Knowing Get access Stephen Hetherington Stephen Hetherington University of New South Wales Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 48, Issue 193, October 1998, Pages 453–469, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00114 Published: 07 January 2003
Epistemology's Paradox
The author explores the epistemology of epistemology, arguing that there is a paradox at the heart of epistemological thinking which implies that no epistemological thinking is rational, and thus re-opening the question of the point of epistemology
On Being Epistemically Internal
The Gettier-illusion
Knowledge’s Boundary Problem
Actually Knowing
Journal Article Actually Knowing Get access Stephen Hetherington Stephen Hetherington University of New South Wales Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 48, Issue 193, October 1998, Pages 453–469, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00114 Published: 07 January 2003
Knowledge as Potential for Action
Can we conceive cogently of all knowledge – in particular, all knowledge of truths – as being knowledge-how? This paper provides reasons for thinking not only that is this possible, but that it is conceptually advantageous and suggestive. Those reasons include adaptations of, and responses to, some classic philosophical arguments and ideas, from Descartes, Hume, Peirce, Mill, and Ryle. The paper’s position is thus a practicalism – a kind of pragm…
Concessive knowledge-attributions
Is This a World Where Knowledge Has to Include Justification
If any thesis is all‐but‐universally accepted by contemporary epistemologists, it is justificationism—the thesis that being an instance of knowledge has to include being epistemically justified in some appropriate way. If there is to be any epistemological knowledge about knowledge, a paradigm candidate would seem to be our knowledge that justificationism is true. This is a conception of a way in which knowledge has to be robust . Nevertheless, t…
On Being Epistemically Internal
Some fallibilist knowledge
Arm’s-length funding of the arts as an expression of laissez-faire
While questions continue to be raised over the continuation, nature and mechanisms of arms’-length funding for the arts, its theoretical foundations within a wider social and economic context remain under-explored. This article argues that the principle on which the arm’s-length relationship is constructed is defined by the concept of laissez-faire. It is this that sets rules for how the public and private spheres interact within a liberal and in…
On Being Epistemically Internal
Epistemology's Paradox
The author explores the epistemology of epistemology, arguing that there is a paradox at the heart of epistemological thinking which implies that no epistemological thinking is rational, and thus re-opening the question of the point of epistemology
Actually Knowing
Journal Article Actually Knowing Get access Stephen Hetherington Stephen Hetherington University of New South Wales Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 48, Issue 193, October 1998, Pages 453–469, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00114 Published: 07 January 2003
Knowing (How It Is) That P
Pode o conhecimento de uma dada verdade admitir gradações? Sim, de fato, segundo o gradualismo deste artigo. O artigo introduz o conceito do saber-como que p – isto é, o conceito de saber como é que p. Saber-como que p é claramente gradual – admitindo gradações, dado que se pode saber mais ou menos como é que p. E a vinculação que este artigo faz entre sabercomo que p e saber que p revela que este último tipo de conhecimento também é gradual (mes…
Knowledge’s Boundary Problem
Confusion
Book Review| October 01 2007 Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge Joseph L. Camp Jr., Confusion: A Study in the Theory of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002. x + 246 pp. Stephen Hetherington Stephen Hetherington Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (4): 647–650. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-017 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedI…
Is This a World Where Knowledge Has to Include Justification
If any thesis is all‐but‐universally accepted by contemporary epistemologists, it is justificationism—the thesis that being an instance of knowledge has to include being epistemically justified in some appropriate way. If there is to be any epistemological knowledge about knowledge, a paradigm candidate would seem to be our knowledge that justificationism is true. This is a conception of a way in which knowledge has to be robust . Nevertheless, t…
Ginet on A Priori Knowledge
Sceptical possibilities? No worries
Elusive epistemological justification
The Gettier-illusion
Concessive knowledge-attributions
Technological Knowledge-That As Knowledge-How
Arm’s-length funding of the arts as an expression of laissez-faire
While questions continue to be raised over the continuation, nature and mechanisms of arms’-length funding for the arts, its theoretical foundations within a wider social and economic context remain under-explored. This article argues that the principle on which the arm’s-length relationship is constructed is defined by the concept of laissez-faire. It is this that sets rules for how the public and private spheres interact within a liberal and in…
Knowledge and the Gettier Problem
Edmund Gettier's 1963 verdict about what knowledge is not has become an item of philosophical orthodoxy, accepted by philosophers as a genuine epistemological result. It assures us that - contrary to what Plato and later philosophers have thought - knowledge is not merely a true belief well supported by epistemic justification. But that orthodoxy has generated the Gettier problem - epistemology's continuing struggle to understand how to accommoda…
Knowledge and the Gettier Problem
Knowledge as Potential for Action
Can we conceive cogently of all knowledge – in particular, all knowledge of truths – as being knowledge-how? This paper provides reasons for thinking not only that is this possible, but that it is conceptually advantageous and suggestive. Those reasons include adaptations of, and responses to, some classic philosophical arguments and ideas, from Descartes, Hume, Peirce, Mill, and Ryle. The paper’s position is thus a practicalism – a kind of pragm…
The redundancy problem
What the Ancients Offer to Contemporary Epistemology
Knowing Our Limits
I wish that more epistemology books were like Nathan Ballantyne’s Knowing Our Limits. Its literary and historical sensibility; its patiently philosophical sensitivity; its dash of philosophical wis
Some fallibilist knowledge
Knowledge in Contemporary Philosophy
Ajp —100
Knowing that as knowing how
We defend a new, neurocognitive version of the view that knowing that is a form of knowing how and its manifestation. Specifically, we argue that knowing that P is knowing how to represent the fact that P , ground such a representation in the fact that P , use such a representation to guide action with respect to P when needed, store traces of such representations, and exercising the relevant know-how. More precisely, agents acquire knowledge via…
Philosophy (20 obras) · Epistemology (19 obras) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 obras) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 obras) · Metaphysics (11 obras) · Computer Science (9 obras) · Philosophy of science (9 obras) · Philosophy of language (8 obras) · Philosophy (6 obras) · Psychology (6 obras)