Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Ain Simpson

Dados Biográficos

ID5449926
NOMEAin Simpson
PRENOMESAin
SOBRENOMESimpson
ASSINATURASIMPSON A
AFILIAÇÕESDepartment of Psychology Ohio University USA
ORCID0000-0002-1690-486X
VERIFICADOSim
TOTAL DE OBRAS6
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES32
OBRAS COMO AUTOR6
OBRAS COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO2015
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2019
ÍNDICE H3
  • Is science for atheists? Perceived threat to religious cultural authority explains U.S. Christians’ distrust in secularized science

    Open Access•Ain Simpson, Kimberly Rios•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2019

    A history of perceived conflict between religion and science persists in the U.S. “culture wars” that juxtapose religious and secular worldviews. As modern societies grow increasingly secular, religion is often deemed an impediment to science-based policy-making, whereas science is increasingly associated with atheism. In the present research, we addressed how perceived science–atheism associations affect U.S. Christians’ attitudes toward science…

  • Perceived Morality and Antiatheist Prejudice

    Ain Simpson, Caitlin McCurrie et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2019•Citada por: 3•Referências: 3

    Recent evidence suggests that, although moral distrust drives antiatheist prejudice, certain types of morality are central: Perceived atheist moral capacity for caring and compassion appears to be central, whereas perceived atheist moral capacity for fairness, in-group loyalty, deferential respect, or purity/decency is not (Simpson & Rios, 2017). Here, we extend this research. First, we conceptually replicated experimental effects: Manipulating t…

  • The moral contents of anti‐atheist prejudice (and why atheists should care about it)

    Open Access•Ain Simpson, Kimberly Rios•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2017•Citada por: 10•Referências: 21

    Anti‐atheist prejudice is pervasive worldwide. Past research indicates that this is driven by perceptions of atheist immorality, yet such perceptions have not been explored in detail. Using Moral Foundations Theory and samples of U.S. Christians, we investigated whether anti‐atheist prejudice is explained by atheists' perceived adherence to certain foundational moral values more than others. Study 1 participants completed measures of moral value …

  • Generous heathens? Reputational concerns and atheists' behavior toward Christians in economic games

    Open Access•Colleen M Cowgill, Kimberly Rios et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2017•Citada por: 8•Referências: 44

  • How Do U.S. Christians and Atheists Stereotype One Another’s Moral Values

    Ain Simpson, Kimberly Rios•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2016•Citada por: 9•Referências: 6

    Moral conflict between Christians and atheists is becoming increasingly heated amidst the U.S. “culture wars,” yet research has been mostly silent regarding how these groups stereotype one another’s moral values and beliefs. We used moral foundations theory to better understand the nature of such stereotypes. In Study 1, U.S. Christian and atheist participants completed measures of moral values from their own perspective as well as the perspectiv…

  • Different relational models underlie prototypical left and right positions on social issues

    Open Access•Ain Simpson, Simon M Laham•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2015•Citada por: 2•Referências: 35

    Social issues are important dividing lines in the “culture wars” between the political left and right. Despite much research into social issue stance and ideology, little research has explored these with Relational Models Theory (RMT). RMT proposes four distinct models that people use to construe social relations, each entailing distinct moral considerations. In two studies, participants read summaries of the models, rated how relevant each was t…

  • The moral contents of anti‐atheist prejudice (and why atheists should care about it)

    Open Access•Ain Simpson, Kimberly Rios•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2017•Citada por: 10•Referências: 21

    Anti‐atheist prejudice is pervasive worldwide. Past research indicates that this is driven by perceptions of atheist immorality, yet such perceptions have not been explored in detail. Using Moral Foundations Theory and samples of U.S. Christians, we investigated whether anti‐atheist prejudice is explained by atheists' perceived adherence to certain foundational moral values more than others. Study 1 participants completed measures of moral value …

  • How Do U.S. Christians and Atheists Stereotype One Another’s Moral Values

    Ain Simpson, Kimberly Rios•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2016•Citada por: 9•Referências: 6

    Moral conflict between Christians and atheists is becoming increasingly heated amidst the U.S. “culture wars,” yet research has been mostly silent regarding how these groups stereotype one another’s moral values and beliefs. We used moral foundations theory to better understand the nature of such stereotypes. In Study 1, U.S. Christian and atheist participants completed measures of moral values from their own perspective as well as the perspectiv…

  • Generous heathens? Reputational concerns and atheists' behavior toward Christians in economic games

    Open Access•Colleen M Cowgill, Kimberly Rios et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2017•Citada por: 8•Referências: 44

  • Perceived Morality and Antiatheist Prejudice

    Ain Simpson, Caitlin McCurrie et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2019•Citada por: 3•Referências: 3

    Recent evidence suggests that, although moral distrust drives antiatheist prejudice, certain types of morality are central: Perceived atheist moral capacity for caring and compassion appears to be central, whereas perceived atheist moral capacity for fairness, in-group loyalty, deferential respect, or purity/decency is not (Simpson & Rios, 2017). Here, we extend this research. First, we conceptually replicated experimental effects: Manipulating t…

  • Different relational models underlie prototypical left and right positions on social issues

    Open Access•Ain Simpson, Simon M Laham•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2015•Citada por: 2•Referências: 35

    Social issues are important dividing lines in the “culture wars” between the political left and right. Despite much research into social issue stance and ideology, little research has explored these with Relational Models Theory (RMT). RMT proposes four distinct models that people use to construe social relations, each entailing distinct moral considerations. In two studies, participants read summaries of the models, rated how relevant each was t…

  • Different relational models underlie prototypical left and right positions on social issues

    Open Access•Ain Simpson, Simon M Laham•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2015•Citada por: 2•Referências: 35

    Social issues are important dividing lines in the “culture wars” between the political left and right. Despite much research into social issue stance and ideology, little research has explored these with Relational Models Theory (RMT). RMT proposes four distinct models that people use to construe social relations, each entailing distinct moral considerations. In two studies, participants read summaries of the models, rated how relevant each was t…

  • How Do U.S. Christians and Atheists Stereotype One Another’s Moral Values

    Ain Simpson, Kimberly Rios•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2016•Citada por: 9•Referências: 6

    Moral conflict between Christians and atheists is becoming increasingly heated amidst the U.S. “culture wars,” yet research has been mostly silent regarding how these groups stereotype one another’s moral values and beliefs. We used moral foundations theory to better understand the nature of such stereotypes. In Study 1, U.S. Christian and atheist participants completed measures of moral values from their own perspective as well as the perspectiv…

  • The moral contents of anti‐atheist prejudice (and why atheists should care about it)

    Open Access•Ain Simpson, Kimberly Rios•ARTICLE•European Journal of Social…•2017•Citada por: 10•Referências: 21

    Anti‐atheist prejudice is pervasive worldwide. Past research indicates that this is driven by perceptions of atheist immorality, yet such perceptions have not been explored in detail. Using Moral Foundations Theory and samples of U.S. Christians, we investigated whether anti‐atheist prejudice is explained by atheists' perceived adherence to certain foundational moral values more than others. Study 1 participants completed measures of moral value …

  • Generous heathens? Reputational concerns and atheists' behavior toward Christians in economic games

    Open Access•Colleen M Cowgill, Kimberly Rios et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2017•Citada por: 8•Referências: 44

  • Is science for atheists? Perceived threat to religious cultural authority explains U.S. Christians’ distrust in secularized science

    Open Access•Ain Simpson, Kimberly Rios•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2019

    A history of perceived conflict between religion and science persists in the U.S. “culture wars” that juxtapose religious and secular worldviews. As modern societies grow increasingly secular, religion is often deemed an impediment to science-based policy-making, whereas science is increasingly associated with atheism. In the present research, we addressed how perceived science–atheism associations affect U.S. Christians’ attitudes toward science…

  • Perceived Morality and Antiatheist Prejudice

    Ain Simpson, Caitlin McCurrie et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2019•Citada por: 3•Referências: 3

    Recent evidence suggests that, although moral distrust drives antiatheist prejudice, certain types of morality are central: Perceived atheist moral capacity for caring and compassion appears to be central, whereas perceived atheist moral capacity for fairness, in-group loyalty, deferential respect, or purity/decency is not (Simpson & Rios, 2017). Here, we extend this research. First, we conceptually replicated experimental effects: Manipulating t…

Psychology (6 obras) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 obras) · Social Psychology (6 obras) · Epistemology (4 obras) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 obras) · Cultural Differences and Values (3 obras) · Law (3 obras) · Morality (3 obras) · Philosophy (3 obras) · Political science (3 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae