Wayne E Brockriede
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 5595097 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Wayne E Brockriede |
| PRENOMES | Wayne E |
| SOBRENOME | Brockriede |
| ASSINATURA | BROCKRIEDE W E |
| AFILIAÇÕES | University of Illinois Chicago |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 16 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 31 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 16 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1955 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2009 |
| ÍNDICE H | 3 |
Onde está a argumentação
Neste artigo procura situar-se a argumentação na proximidade das pessoas e das actividades humanas. Se podemos potencialmente encontrar argumentos em todo o lado, a argumentação liga-se essencialmente à dimensão problemática com que as pessoas perspectivam os assuntos e fazem o seu pensamento progredir. O constructo apresentado neste artigo pauta a argumentação pela conjugação de seis características fundamentais e situa-a na zona média do contin…
Constructs, experience, and argument
A “third world of inquiry” lies beyond a humanistic study of rhetoric and a social scientific study of communication. This essay explores such a world through the philosophical position of perspectivism, which reveals that by thematizing a relationship between constructs and experience, one is led to an interpretive stance; by thematizing a relationship between argument and experience, one is led to criticism; and by thematizing argument and cons…
A criticism of handbook
HANDBOOK OF RHETORICAL AND COMMUNICATION THEORY. Edited by Carroll C. Arnold and John Waite Bowers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1984, pp. viii + 916. $60.00
Arguing about human understanding
The concepts of human understanding and arguing are approached perspectivally by emphasizing one dimension of a construct as the figure and deemphasizing others as the ground. This approach is designed to supplement a more traditional mode of analyzing categories reductionistically. Human understanding may be thematized empirically, personally, or linguistically. Arguing may be thematized as rhetorical process, logical product, or dialectical met…
Books reviews
FORM AND GENRE: SHAPING RHETORICAL ACTION. Edited by Karlyn Kohrs Campbell and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Falls Church, Va.: The Speech Communication Association, 1978; pp. 189. $4.95 for SCA members; $5.95 for non‐members. A JUSTIFICATION OF RATIONALITY. By John Kekes. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1976; pp. xiv+275. $20.00. TRUST: A NEW VIEW OF PERSONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT. By Jack R. Gibb. Los Angeles: Guild of Tutors Pre…
Rhetorical criticism as argument
Rhetorical critics, whether evaluating or explaining rhetorical experiences, are more useful when they argue than when they do not. Critics who argue provide information and invite confrontation that tests the intersubjective reliability of their argument and hence contribute to a more dependable understanding of a rhetorical experience or of rhetoric
Stokely Carmichael
Stokely Carmichael attempted to identify primarily with a black audience in the presentation of a Black Power ideology. White liberals responded negatively. Would the response have been different if the mass media had conveyed the full force of Carmichael's rhetoric?
Dimensions of the concept of rhetoric
Toward a contemporary Aristotelian theory of rhetoric
(1966). Toward a contemporary Aristotelian theory of rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech: Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 33-40
Shop talk
Toulmin on argument
(1960). Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech: Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 44-53
The forum
Discussion contests versus group‐action tournaments
Briefly noted
ORAL READING. By Lionel Crocker and Louis M. Eich. (Second edition). New York: Prentice‐Hall, Inc., 1955; pp. v+492. $5.75. THE ROMAN MIND: STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF THOUGHT FROM CICERO TO MARCUS AURELIUS. By Martin L. Clarke. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1956; pp. vii+168. $3.75. THE PHILOSOPHY OF JONATHAN EDWARDS FROM HIS PRIVATE NOTEBOOKS. Edited by Harvey G. Townsend. Eugene, Oregon: The University Press, 1955; pp. xii+…
Bentham's criticism of rhetoric and rhetoricians
The Rhetoric of Black Power.
Toulmin on argument
(1960). Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech: Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 44-53
Rhetorical criticism as argument
Rhetorical critics, whether evaluating or explaining rhetorical experiences, are more useful when they argue than when they do not. Critics who argue provide information and invite confrontation that tests the intersubjective reliability of their argument and hence contribute to a more dependable understanding of a rhetorical experience or of rhetoric
Dimensions of the concept of rhetoric
Constructs, experience, and argument
A “third world of inquiry” lies beyond a humanistic study of rhetoric and a social scientific study of communication. This essay explores such a world through the philosophical position of perspectivism, which reveals that by thematizing a relationship between constructs and experience, one is led to an interpretive stance; by thematizing a relationship between argument and experience, one is led to criticism; and by thematizing argument and cons…
Arguing about human understanding
The concepts of human understanding and arguing are approached perspectivally by emphasizing one dimension of a construct as the figure and deemphasizing others as the ground. This approach is designed to supplement a more traditional mode of analyzing categories reductionistically. Human understanding may be thematized empirically, personally, or linguistically. Arguing may be thematized as rhetorical process, logical product, or dialectical met…
Toward a contemporary Aristotelian theory of rhetoric
(1966). Toward a contemporary Aristotelian theory of rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech: Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 33-40
Bentham's criticism of rhetoric and rhetoricians
Briefly noted
ORAL READING. By Lionel Crocker and Louis M. Eich. (Second edition). New York: Prentice‐Hall, Inc., 1955; pp. v+492. $5.75. THE ROMAN MIND: STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF THOUGHT FROM CICERO TO MARCUS AURELIUS. By Martin L. Clarke. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1956; pp. vii+168. $3.75. THE PHILOSOPHY OF JONATHAN EDWARDS FROM HIS PRIVATE NOTEBOOKS. Edited by Harvey G. Townsend. Eugene, Oregon: The University Press, 1955; pp. xii+…
The forum
Discussion contests versus group‐action tournaments
Shop talk
Toulmin on argument
(1960). Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech: Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 44-53
Toward a contemporary Aristotelian theory of rhetoric
(1966). Toward a contemporary Aristotelian theory of rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech: Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 33-40
Stokely Carmichael
Stokely Carmichael attempted to identify primarily with a black audience in the presentation of a Black Power ideology. White liberals responded negatively. Would the response have been different if the mass media had conveyed the full force of Carmichael's rhetoric?
Dimensions of the concept of rhetoric
Rhetorical criticism as argument
Rhetorical critics, whether evaluating or explaining rhetorical experiences, are more useful when they argue than when they do not. Critics who argue provide information and invite confrontation that tests the intersubjective reliability of their argument and hence contribute to a more dependable understanding of a rhetorical experience or of rhetoric
Books reviews
FORM AND GENRE: SHAPING RHETORICAL ACTION. Edited by Karlyn Kohrs Campbell and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Falls Church, Va.: The Speech Communication Association, 1978; pp. 189. $4.95 for SCA members; $5.95 for non‐members. A JUSTIFICATION OF RATIONALITY. By John Kekes. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1976; pp. xiv+275. $20.00. TRUST: A NEW VIEW OF PERSONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT. By Jack R. Gibb. Los Angeles: Guild of Tutors Pre…
Arguing about human understanding
The concepts of human understanding and arguing are approached perspectivally by emphasizing one dimension of a construct as the figure and deemphasizing others as the ground. This approach is designed to supplement a more traditional mode of analyzing categories reductionistically. Human understanding may be thematized empirically, personally, or linguistically. Arguing may be thematized as rhetorical process, logical product, or dialectical met…
A criticism of handbook
HANDBOOK OF RHETORICAL AND COMMUNICATION THEORY. Edited by Carroll C. Arnold and John Waite Bowers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1984, pp. viii + 916. $60.00
Constructs, experience, and argument
A “third world of inquiry” lies beyond a humanistic study of rhetoric and a social scientific study of communication. This essay explores such a world through the philosophical position of perspectivism, which reveals that by thematizing a relationship between constructs and experience, one is led to an interpretive stance; by thematizing a relationship between argument and experience, one is led to criticism; and by thematizing argument and cons…
Onde está a argumentação
Neste artigo procura situar-se a argumentação na proximidade das pessoas e das actividades humanas. Se podemos potencialmente encontrar argumentos em todo o lado, a argumentação liga-se essencialmente à dimensão problemática com que as pessoas perspectivam os assuntos e fazem o seu pensamento progredir. O constructo apresentado neste artigo pauta a argumentação pela conjugação de seis características fundamentais e situa-a na zona média do contin…
The Rhetoric of Black Power.
Philosophy (14 obras) · Sociology (14 obras) · Linguistics (10 obras) · Political science (9 obras) · Epistemology (7 obras) · Law (7 obras) · Psychology (7 obras) · Rhetoric (7 obras) · Art (5 obras) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 obras)