Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Shana M Solomon

Dados Biográficos

ID6209756
NOMEShana M Solomon
PRENOMESShana M
SOBRENOMESolomon
ASSINATURASOLOMON S M
AFILIAÇÕESCornell Law School
VERIFICADONão
TOTAL DE OBRAS1
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES5
OBRAS COMO AUTOR1
OBRAS COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO1996
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO1996
ÍNDICE H1
  • Setting Boundaries between Science and Law

    Open Access•Shana M Solomon, E J Hackett•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1996•Citada por: 5•Referências: 14

    In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court made its first major pronouncement on the evaluation of scientific evidence, calling on judges to act as gatekeepers for scientific knowledge and validity, despite lack of scientific training among judges. Daubert offers the science studies community a case study for examining how judges (and scientists acting as experts) engage in boundary-work and construct scientific valid…

  • Setting Boundaries between Science and Law

    Open Access•Shana M Solomon, E J Hackett•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1996•Citada por: 5•Referências: 14

    In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court made its first major pronouncement on the evaluation of scientific evidence, calling on judges to act as gatekeepers for scientific knowledge and validity, despite lack of scientific training among judges. Daubert offers the science studies community a case study for examining how judges (and scientists acting as experts) engage in boundary-work and construct scientific valid…

  • Setting Boundaries between Science and Law

    Open Access•Shana M Solomon, E J Hackett•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1996•Citada por: 5•Referências: 14

    In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court made its first major pronouncement on the evaluation of scientific evidence, calling on judges to act as gatekeepers for scientific knowledge and validity, despite lack of scientific training among judges. Daubert offers the science studies community a case study for examining how judges (and scientists acting as experts) engage in boundary-work and construct scientific valid…

Adversarial system (1 obra) · Computer Science (1 obra) · Construct (python library (1 obra) · Epistemology (1 obra) · Ethics in Clinical Research (1 obra) · Federal Rules of Evidence (1 obra) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (1 obra) · Law (1 obra) · Law (1 obra) · Philosophy and History of Science (1 obra)

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae