Bashshar Haydar
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 6339137 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Bashshar Haydar |
| PRENOMES | Bashshar |
| SOBRENOME | Haydar |
| ASSINATURA | HAYDAR B |
| AFILIAÇÕES | American University of Beirut |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7272-1865 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 8 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 6 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 8 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2002 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2019 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
What do the affluent owe the global poor, an introduction
This paper provides an introduction to the special issue on Christian Barry and Gerhard Øverland’s book ‘Responding to Global Poverty’. The issue includes eight critical essays, a precis of the book and a response to critics by Barry
Barry and Øverland’s defence of a moderate principle of assistance
In this paper, I argue that Barry and Øverland did not succeed in providing an answer to Singer’s challenge. I start by arguing against their claim, that the case on which Singer relies on in order to generate a highly demanding assistance requirement, has a special feature that limits its applicability to other situations. Second, I argue against Barry and Øverland’s attempt to undermine any highly demanding principle of assistance on the basis …
The Consequences of Rejecting the Moral Relevance of the Doing–Allowing Distinction
The claim that one is never morally permitted to engage in non-optimal harm doing enjoys a great intuitive appeal. If in addition to this claim, we reject the moral relevance of the doing–allowing distinction, then we should also accept the claim that one is never morally permitted to engage in non-optimal harm allowing . Those who want to reject the conclusion of the above argument usually do so by defending the moral relevance of the doing–allo…
Special Responsibility and the Appeal to Cost
Extreme Poverty and Global Responsibility
This essay addresses the questions of whether and how much responsibility for extreme poverty should be assigned to global and domestic institutional orders. The main focus is on whether the global order brings about the existing levels of extreme poverty or merely allows them. By examining Thomas Pogge's recent contribution on this topic, I argue that although he builds a plausible case for the claim that the global order brings about, and not m…
Irreversible Generalism
Journal Article Irreversible Generalism: A Reply to Dickie Get access Oliver Conolly, Oliver Conolly Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Bashshar Haydar Bashshar Haydar Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The British Journal of Aesthetics, Volume 45, Issue 3, July 2005, Pages 289–295, https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayi031 Published: 01 July 2005
Forced Supererogation and Deontological Restrictions
Consequentialism and the Doing-Allowing Distinction
This paper takes a closer look at the incompatibility thesis, namely the claim that consequentialism is incompatible with accepting the moral relevance of the doing-allowing distinction. I examine two attempts to reject the incompatibility thesis, the first by Samuel Scheffler and the second by Frances Kamm. I argue that both attempts fail to provide an adequate ground for rejecting the incompatibility thesis. I then put forward an account of wha…
Special Responsibility and the Appeal to Cost
Consequentialism and the Doing-Allowing Distinction
This paper takes a closer look at the incompatibility thesis, namely the claim that consequentialism is incompatible with accepting the moral relevance of the doing-allowing distinction. I examine two attempts to reject the incompatibility thesis, the first by Samuel Scheffler and the second by Frances Kamm. I argue that both attempts fail to provide an adequate ground for rejecting the incompatibility thesis. I then put forward an account of wha…
Forced Supererogation and Deontological Restrictions
Consequentialism and the Doing-Allowing Distinction
This paper takes a closer look at the incompatibility thesis, namely the claim that consequentialism is incompatible with accepting the moral relevance of the doing-allowing distinction. I examine two attempts to reject the incompatibility thesis, the first by Samuel Scheffler and the second by Frances Kamm. I argue that both attempts fail to provide an adequate ground for rejecting the incompatibility thesis. I then put forward an account of wha…
Extreme Poverty and Global Responsibility
This essay addresses the questions of whether and how much responsibility for extreme poverty should be assigned to global and domestic institutional orders. The main focus is on whether the global order brings about the existing levels of extreme poverty or merely allows them. By examining Thomas Pogge's recent contribution on this topic, I argue that although he builds a plausible case for the claim that the global order brings about, and not m…
Irreversible Generalism
Journal Article Irreversible Generalism: A Reply to Dickie Get access Oliver Conolly, Oliver Conolly Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Bashshar Haydar Bashshar Haydar Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The British Journal of Aesthetics, Volume 45, Issue 3, July 2005, Pages 289–295, https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayi031 Published: 01 July 2005
Special Responsibility and the Appeal to Cost
The Consequences of Rejecting the Moral Relevance of the Doing–Allowing Distinction
The claim that one is never morally permitted to engage in non-optimal harm doing enjoys a great intuitive appeal. If in addition to this claim, we reject the moral relevance of the doing–allowing distinction, then we should also accept the claim that one is never morally permitted to engage in non-optimal harm allowing . Those who want to reject the conclusion of the above argument usually do so by defending the moral relevance of the doing–allo…
What do the affluent owe the global poor, an introduction
This paper provides an introduction to the special issue on Christian Barry and Gerhard Øverland’s book ‘Responding to Global Poverty’. The issue includes eight critical essays, a precis of the book and a response to critics by Barry
Barry and Øverland’s defence of a moderate principle of assistance
In this paper, I argue that Barry and Øverland did not succeed in providing an answer to Singer’s challenge. I start by arguing against their claim, that the case on which Singer relies on in order to generate a highly demanding assistance requirement, has a special feature that limits its applicability to other situations. Second, I argue against Barry and Øverland’s attempt to undermine any highly demanding principle of assistance on the basis …
Law (6 obras) · Political science (6 obras) · Law (5 obras) · Law and economics (5 obras) · Sociology (5 obras) · Free Will and Agency (4 obras) · Philosophy (4 obras) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 obras) · War, Ethics, and Justification (4 obras) · Appeal (3 obras)