A M Larson

Dados Biográficos

ID6682334
NOMEA M Larson
PRENOMESA M
SOBRENOMELarson
ASSINATURALARSON A M
AFILIAÇÕESCenter for International Forestry Research
ORCID0000-0001-7172-2228
VERIFICADOSim
TOTAL DE OBRAS15
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES17
TOTAL COMO AUTOR15
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO2012
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2026
ÍNDICE H2

  • A horizon scan of global issues on forests and livelihoods for 2026

    Open AccessMatilda Kabutey-Ongor, Katie Devenish et al.ARTICLEForest Policy and Economics2026Referências: 15

  • Helping rural women secure their land and resource rights

    A M Larson, Ruth Meinzen-DickARTICLEGender & Development2025Referências: 2

  • Trends in forest livelihoods research – Taking stock in 2024

    Open AccessI N S Djenontin, Allan Larson et al.ARTICLEForest Policy and Economics2024Referências: 29

  • What is forest tenure (in)security? Insights from participatory perspective analysis

    Open AccessAllan Larson, A M Larson et al.ARTICLEForest Policy and Economics2022Citada por: 1Referências: 13

    Over the past two decades, growing recognition of forest-based Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPs and LCs) sparked forest tenure reforms to formalize IP and LC rights to forests and forest lands through a variety of mechanisms. Nevertheless, tenure security, an intended objective of such reforms, has received less attention, despite being integral to the life and livelihoods of IPs and LCs and important for forests. Formal rights - a t…

  • Coordinating forest tenure reform

    Open AccessRodd Myers, Micah R Fisher et al.ARTICLEForest Policy and Economics2022Citada por: 1Referências: 29

    As forest tenure reform is mainstreamed around the world, outcomes are increasingly determined by the institutions that are responsible for administering its operationalisation and translating policy into implementation. This global study examines state institutional contexts of tenure reform in Kenya, Uganda, Nepal, Indonesia, and Peru. Interviews were administered in 2016–2017 using a fixed questionnaire applied across all countries involving 2…

  • Introduction - Multi-stakeholder forums and the promise of more equitable and sustainable land and resource use

    Open AccessSarmiento Barletti, J P Sarmiento Barletti et al.ARTICLEThe International Forestry Review2021

    Multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) have become a popular mechanism in global development and conservation circles, given the urgency to find transformative approaches to address climate change and unsustainable development. In this current context, it is important to take stock of MSFs, an example of a participatory mechanism that is emerging as a new 'solution'. The papers in this Special Issue of the International Forestry Review derive from a mul…

  • The costs of elite-oriented multi-stakeholder forums to address deforestation

    Open AccessMarina Londres, Allan Larson et al.ARTICLEThe International Forestry Review2021

    This paper examines the Green Municipalities Program (Programa Municípios Verdes – PMV) – a major multi-stakeholder forum designed to combat deforestation – in Pará state in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. We qualitatively analyzed in-depth interviews with 39 people with different perspectives: respondents with deep knowledge of the context but no direct involvement in the program, organizers of the program, diverse program participants, and divers…

  • Can multi-stakeholder forums influence good governance in communal forest management? Lessons from two case studies in Ethiopia

    Open AccessMastewal Yami, Sarmiento Barletti et al.ARTICLEThe International Forestry Review2021

    Following global trends, Multi-Stakeholder Forums (MSFs) have received attention as mechanisms for addressing deforestation and forest degradation in Ethiopia. However, little is understood on their influence on governance of forests. Based on qualitative research conducted in MSFs organized at Bale and Jamma-Urji in Oromia, Ethiopia, this paper examines how MSFs may influence the governance of communal forests. Results indicate that the majority…

  • Politics and power in territorial planning

    Open AccessJazmín Gonzales Tovar, Allan Larson et al.ARTICLEThe International Forestry Review2021

    The use of multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) in territorial planning has gained global popularity. These MSFs aim to bring diverse actors together to collaboratively and equitably develop a plan that assigns optimal land uses to a territory. However, as promoting particular land uses and benefits for some actors often comes at a cost to others, territorial planning MSFs may reproduce or even exacerbate, rather than mitigate, conflicts and asymmetri…

  • Organizing for transformation? How and why organizers plan their multi-stakeholder forums

    Open AccessSarmiento Barletti, J P Sarmiento Barletti et al.ARTICLEThe International Forestry Review2021

    Multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) have received much attention from policymakers and development and conservation practitioners as a transformative solution for more equitable coordination and decision-making over environmental challenges. Studies on "invited spaces" have previously shown the importance of balancing power relations and attending to context. To what extent do the plans and expectations of MSF organizers reflect these previous lesson…

  • Trust-building and leadership in multi-stakeholder forums

    Open AccessA R Tamara, A Tamara et al.ARTICLEThe International Forestry Review2021

    Multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) are coordination spaces that enable discussions, negotiations, and joint planning between different kinds of actors. Proponents of MSFs claim that bringing different actors to the same table may help solve complex problems. Nevertheless, an MSF's process and outcomes are affected by its leadership and whether participants are able to trust each other. This paper examines the influence of trust and leadership in thr…

  • Hot topics in governance for forests and trees

    Open AccessAllan Larson, A M Larson et al.ARTICLEForest Policy and Economics2021Citada por: 10Referências: 26

    We are living in a time of crisis on planet Earth. Urgent calls for transformational change are getting louder. Technical solutions have an important role to play in addressing pressing global challenges, but alone they are not enough. After all, who decides what kind of transformation is needed, of what, and for whom? What principles guide those decisions, and how are decision-makers held accountable? This commentary article argues that these go…

  • Learning to learn in tropical forests

    Open AccessKristen Evans, Allan Larson et al.ARTICLEThe International Forestry Review2020

    From 2011–2015, the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) trained field teams in Nicaragua in Adaptive Collaborative Management (ACM) methods. ACM is a social learning-based approach to help forest communities manage their natural resources in a more equitable and sustainable way and respond to change. This paper presents the lessons-learned from the training and field work. It argues that understanding and building social learning p…

  • What Matters to Stakeholders? Measuring Values at a University Museum

    Laura D Carsten Conner, A M Larson et al.ARTICLEVisitor Studies2014

    Perceptions of museum performance may be linked to individual values. This study asked members of different groups that hold a stake in a university museum (e.g., Alaska Native, Art Community, Business Community, Donors/Museum Members, Military Leaders, Science Community, K–12 Teachers, University Leaders) what they valued about their museum's performance. Results indicate that key differences exist with respect to performance indicators among so…

  • Decentralization and forest-related conflicts in Latin America

    Ashwin Ravikumar, Krister Andersson et al.ARTICLEForest Policy and Economics2012Citada por: 5Referências: 8