Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

L M Bouter

Dados Biográficos

ID6763848
NOMEL M Bouter
PRENOMESL M
SOBRENOMEBouter
ASSINATURABOUTER L M
AFILIAÇÕESAmsterdam University Medical Centers
ORCID0000-0002-2659-5482
VERIFICADOSim
TOTAL DE OBRAS24
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES0
TOTAL COMO AUTOR24
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO2005
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2026
ÍNDICE H0
  • Replication and replicability as epistemic opportunity for the humanities

    Open Access•Charlotte C S Rulkens, Rafael Peels et al.•ARTICLE•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

    Motivated by the ‘replication crisis’ that deeply impacted the biomedical, natural, and social sciences, we conducted a case study to examine the strengths and limitations of replication in the humanities. Specifically, we replicated an art historical Rembrandt attribution study. In this article we place the methodology and outcomes of the Rembrandt replication within the broader debate on replication in the humanities, with the aim of delving de…

  • The attribution of two portraits of Rembrandt revisited

    Open Access•Charlotte C S Rulkens, Rafael Peels et al.•ARTICLE•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

    This article presents the results of a replication study in the humanities, more specifically in art history. The initial study was carried out in 1998–99 and concerned the attribution of two similar painted portraits of Rembrandt in the collections of the Mauritshuis in The Hague and the Germanisches Nationalmuseum in Nuremberg. In the replication study, the initial research questions were readdressed: Is the Mauritshuis version painted by Rembr…

  • Navigating Ambiguity and Uncertainty in End-of-Life Care Research Practice

    Open Access•Tom van Drimmelen, M Nienke Slagboom et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2025•Referências: 13

    Researchers frequently face conceptual, methodological, and ethical decisions - collectively known as researcher discretion - that can substantially influence research outcomes. Despite its importance, the nature of these discretionary moments and their triggers in everyday research practice remain underexplored. Based on an abductive thematic analysis of fieldnotes, documents, and interviews from twelve months of ethnographic fieldwork in two en…

  • Can moral case deliberation in research groups help to navigate research integrity dilemmas? A pilot study

    Open Access•Tamarinde L Haven, Bert C Molewijk et al.•ARTICLE•Research Ethics•2024

    There is an increased focus on fostering integrity in research by through creating an open culture where research integrity dilemmas can be discussed. We describe a pilot intervention study that used Moral Case Deliberation (MCD), a method that originated in clinical ethics support, to discuss research integrity dilemmas with researchers. Our research question was: can moral case deliberation in research groups help to navigate research integrity…

  • Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions

    Open Access•Krishma Labib, Natalie Evans et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2023

    To foster research integrity (RI), research institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. To support institutions to achieve this, we developed RI education guidelines together with RI experts and research administrators, exploring similarities and differences in recommendations across target groups, as well as recommendations about RI education using approaches other than formal RI training. We…

  • The Contribution of Moral Case Deliberation to Teaching RCR to PhD Students

    Open Access•Giulia Inguaggiato, Krishma Labib et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2023

    Teaching responsible conduct of research (RCR) to PhD students is crucial for fostering responsible research practice. In this paper, we show how the use of Moral Case Deliberation—a case reflection method used in the Amsterdam UMC RCR PhD course—is particularity valuable to address three goals of RCR education: (1) making students aware of, and internalize, RCR principles and values, (2) supporting reflection on good conduct in personal daily pr…

  • Stakeholders’ Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities

    Open Access•Natalie Evans, Ivan Buljan et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2022

    Fostering research integrity (RI) increasingly focuses on normative guidance and supportive measures within institutions. To be successful, the implementation of support should be informed by stakeholders’ experiences of RI support. This study aims to explore experiences of RI support in Dutch, Spanish and Croatian universities. In total, 59 stakeholders (Netherlands n = 25, Spain n = 17, Croatia n = 17) participated in 16 focus groups in three E…

  • Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations

    Open Access•Krishma Labib, Rea Roje et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2021

    To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers’ behavior. Consequently, research performing and research funding organizations (RPOs and RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining the concrete steps they will take to foster RI. So far, there is no consensus on which topics are important to address in RI policies. Therefore, we conducted a three …

  • Should research misconduct be criminalized

    Open Access•Rafael Dal‐ré, L M Bouter et al.•ARTICLE•Research Ethics•2020

    For more than 25 years, research misconduct (research fraud) is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP)—although other research misbehaviors have been also added in codes of conduct and legislations. A critical issue in deciding whether research misconduct should be subject to criminal law is its definition, because not all behaviors labeled as research misconduct qualifies as serious crime. But assuming that all FFP is fraud a…

  • Researchers’ Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate

    Open Access•Tamarinde L Haven, H Roeline Pasman et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

    The research climate plays a key role in fostering integrity in research. However, little is known about what constitutes a responsible research climate. We investigated academic researchers’ perceptions on this through focus group interviews. We recruited researchers from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and the Amsterdam University Medical Center to participate in focus group discussions that consisted of researchers from similar academic ranks…

  • Determinants of Citation in Epidemiological Studies on Phthalates

    Open Access•Miriam J E Urlings, Bram Duyx et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

    Citing of previous publications is an important factor in knowledge development. Because of the great amount of publications available, only a selection of studies gets cited, for varying reasons. If the selection of citations is associated with study outcome this is called citation bias. We will study determinants of citation in a broader sense, including e.g. study design, journal impact factor or the funding source of the publication. As a cas…

  • What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity

    Open Access•L M Bouter•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

    In many countries attention for fostering research integrity started with a misconduct case that got a lot of media exposure. But there is an emerging consensus that questionable research practices are more harmful due to their high prevalence. QRPs have in common that they can help to make study results more exciting, more positive and more statistically significant. That makes them tempting to engage in. Research institutions have the duty to e…

  • Cosmin guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures

    Open Access•C A C Prinsen, Lidwine B Mokkink et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2018

    The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs includes methodology to combine the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties with the quality of the PROM itself (i.e., its measurement properties). This enables reviewers to draw transparent conclusions and making evidence-based recommendations on the quality of PROMs, and supports the evidence-based selection of PROMs for use in research and in clinical practice

  • Invited Commentary on “Investigating the Reliability and Factor Structure of Kalichman’s ‘Survey 2

    Open Access•L M Bouter•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2017

    TEST 02 - Elsevier's Scopus, the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature. Search and access research from the science, technology, medicine, social sciences and arts and humanities fields

  • Cosmin Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

    Open Access•Lidwine B Mokkink, Henrica C W de Vet et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2017

    The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was developed exclusively for use in systematic reviews of PROMs to distinguish this application from other purposes of assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties, such as guidance for designing or reporting a study on the measurement properties

  • Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties

    Open Access•Caroline B Terwee, Lidwine B Mokkink et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2011

    Based on experience in testing this scoring system on 46 articles, the COSMIN checklist with the proposed scoring system seems to be a useful tool for assessing the methodological quality of studies included in systematic reviews of measurement properties

  • The Cosmin study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes

    Open Access•Lidwine B Mokkink, Caroline B Terwee et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2010

  • The Cosmin checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments

    Open Access•Lidwine B Mokkink, Caroline B Terwee et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2010

    The resulting COSMIN checklist could be useful when selecting a measurement instrument, peer-reviewing a manuscript, designing or reporting a study on measurement properties, or for educational purposes

  • Does age modify the relationship between morbidity severity and physical health in English and Dutch family practice populations

    Open Access•Umesh Kadam, Umesh T Kadam et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2009

  • Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

    Open Access•Caroline B Terwee, Sandra D M Bot et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2007

  • The effectiveness of adding cognitive behavioural therapy aimed at changing lifestyle to managed diabetes care for patients with type 2 diabetes

    Open Access•Laura M C Welschen, Laura MC Welschen et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Public Health•2007

    Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12666286

  • Minimally important change determined by a visual method integratingan anchor-based and a distribution-based approach

    Open Access•Henrica C W de Vet, Raymond W J G Ostelo et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2006

    The anchor-based MIC distribution method provides a general framework, applicable to all kind of anchors. This method forces researchers to choose and justify their choice of an appropriate anchor and to define minimal importance on that anchor. The MIC is not an invariable characteristic of a measurement instrument, but may depend, among other things, on the perspective from which minimal importance is considered and the baseline values on the m…

  • Epidemiological study air disaster in Amsterdam (Esada)

    Open Access•Pauline Slottje, Anja C Huizink et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Public Health•2005

    In this paper we describe and discuss the design of the ESADA. The ESADA will provide additional scientific knowledge on the long-term health effects of technological disasters on professional workers

  • Health-related and overall quality of life of patients with chronic hip and knee complaints in general practice

    Open Access•Johanna M van der Waal, Caroline B Terwee et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2005

Sem obras proeminentes nesta página.

  • Epidemiological study air disaster in Amsterdam (Esada)

    Open Access•Pauline Slottje, Anja C Huizink et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Public Health•2005

    In this paper we describe and discuss the design of the ESADA. The ESADA will provide additional scientific knowledge on the long-term health effects of technological disasters on professional workers

  • Health-related and overall quality of life of patients with chronic hip and knee complaints in general practice

    Open Access•Johanna M van der Waal, Caroline B Terwee et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2005

  • Minimally important change determined by a visual method integratingan anchor-based and a distribution-based approach

    Open Access•Henrica C W de Vet, Raymond W J G Ostelo et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2006

    The anchor-based MIC distribution method provides a general framework, applicable to all kind of anchors. This method forces researchers to choose and justify their choice of an appropriate anchor and to define minimal importance on that anchor. The MIC is not an invariable characteristic of a measurement instrument, but may depend, among other things, on the perspective from which minimal importance is considered and the baseline values on the m…

  • Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

    Open Access•Caroline B Terwee, Sandra D M Bot et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2007

  • The effectiveness of adding cognitive behavioural therapy aimed at changing lifestyle to managed diabetes care for patients with type 2 diabetes

    Open Access•Laura M C Welschen, Laura MC Welschen et al.•ARTICLE•BMC Public Health•2007

    Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12666286

  • Does age modify the relationship between morbidity severity and physical health in English and Dutch family practice populations

    Open Access•Umesh Kadam, Umesh T Kadam et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2009

  • The Cosmin study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes

    Open Access•Lidwine B Mokkink, Caroline B Terwee et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2010

  • The Cosmin checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments

    Open Access•Lidwine B Mokkink, Caroline B Terwee et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2010

    The resulting COSMIN checklist could be useful when selecting a measurement instrument, peer-reviewing a manuscript, designing or reporting a study on measurement properties, or for educational purposes

  • Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties

    Open Access•Caroline B Terwee, Lidwine B Mokkink et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2011

    Based on experience in testing this scoring system on 46 articles, the COSMIN checklist with the proposed scoring system seems to be a useful tool for assessing the methodological quality of studies included in systematic reviews of measurement properties

  • Invited Commentary on “Investigating the Reliability and Factor Structure of Kalichman’s ‘Survey 2

    Open Access•L M Bouter•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2017

    TEST 02 - Elsevier's Scopus, the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature. Search and access research from the science, technology, medicine, social sciences and arts and humanities fields

  • Cosmin Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

    Open Access•Lidwine B Mokkink, Henrica C W de Vet et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2017

    The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was developed exclusively for use in systematic reviews of PROMs to distinguish this application from other purposes of assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties, such as guidance for designing or reporting a study on the measurement properties

  • Cosmin guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures

    Open Access•C A C Prinsen, Lidwine B Mokkink et al.•ARTICLE•Quality of Life Research•2018

    The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs includes methodology to combine the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties with the quality of the PROM itself (i.e., its measurement properties). This enables reviewers to draw transparent conclusions and making evidence-based recommendations on the quality of PROMs, and supports the evidence-based selection of PROMs for use in research and in clinical practice

  • Should research misconduct be criminalized

    Open Access•Rafael Dal‐ré, L M Bouter et al.•ARTICLE•Research Ethics•2020

    For more than 25 years, research misconduct (research fraud) is defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism (FFP)—although other research misbehaviors have been also added in codes of conduct and legislations. A critical issue in deciding whether research misconduct should be subject to criminal law is its definition, because not all behaviors labeled as research misconduct qualifies as serious crime. But assuming that all FFP is fraud a…

  • Researchers’ Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate

    Open Access•Tamarinde L Haven, H Roeline Pasman et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

    The research climate plays a key role in fostering integrity in research. However, little is known about what constitutes a responsible research climate. We investigated academic researchers’ perceptions on this through focus group interviews. We recruited researchers from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and the Amsterdam University Medical Center to participate in focus group discussions that consisted of researchers from similar academic ranks…

  • Determinants of Citation in Epidemiological Studies on Phthalates

    Open Access•Miriam J E Urlings, Bram Duyx et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

    Citing of previous publications is an important factor in knowledge development. Because of the great amount of publications available, only a selection of studies gets cited, for varying reasons. If the selection of citations is associated with study outcome this is called citation bias. We will study determinants of citation in a broader sense, including e.g. study design, journal impact factor or the funding source of the publication. As a cas…

  • What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity

    Open Access•L M Bouter•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

    In many countries attention for fostering research integrity started with a misconduct case that got a lot of media exposure. But there is an emerging consensus that questionable research practices are more harmful due to their high prevalence. QRPs have in common that they can help to make study results more exciting, more positive and more statistically significant. That makes them tempting to engage in. Research institutions have the duty to e…

  • Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations

    Open Access•Krishma Labib, Rea Roje et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2021

    To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers’ behavior. Consequently, research performing and research funding organizations (RPOs and RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining the concrete steps they will take to foster RI. So far, there is no consensus on which topics are important to address in RI policies. Therefore, we conducted a three …

  • Stakeholders’ Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities

    Open Access•Natalie Evans, Ivan Buljan et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2022

    Fostering research integrity (RI) increasingly focuses on normative guidance and supportive measures within institutions. To be successful, the implementation of support should be informed by stakeholders’ experiences of RI support. This study aims to explore experiences of RI support in Dutch, Spanish and Croatian universities. In total, 59 stakeholders (Netherlands n = 25, Spain n = 17, Croatia n = 17) participated in 16 focus groups in three E…

  • Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions

    Open Access•Krishma Labib, Natalie Evans et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2023

    To foster research integrity (RI), research institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. To support institutions to achieve this, we developed RI education guidelines together with RI experts and research administrators, exploring similarities and differences in recommendations across target groups, as well as recommendations about RI education using approaches other than formal RI training. We…

  • The Contribution of Moral Case Deliberation to Teaching RCR to PhD Students

    Open Access•Giulia Inguaggiato, Krishma Labib et al.•ARTICLE•Science and Engineering Ethics•2023

    Teaching responsible conduct of research (RCR) to PhD students is crucial for fostering responsible research practice. In this paper, we show how the use of Moral Case Deliberation—a case reflection method used in the Amsterdam UMC RCR PhD course—is particularity valuable to address three goals of RCR education: (1) making students aware of, and internalize, RCR principles and values, (2) supporting reflection on good conduct in personal daily pr…

  • Can moral case deliberation in research groups help to navigate research integrity dilemmas? A pilot study

    Open Access•Tamarinde L Haven, Bert C Molewijk et al.•ARTICLE•Research Ethics•2024

    There is an increased focus on fostering integrity in research by through creating an open culture where research integrity dilemmas can be discussed. We describe a pilot intervention study that used Moral Case Deliberation (MCD), a method that originated in clinical ethics support, to discuss research integrity dilemmas with researchers. Our research question was: can moral case deliberation in research groups help to navigate research integrity…

  • The attribution of two portraits of Rembrandt revisited

    Open Access•Charlotte C S Rulkens, Rafael Peels et al.•ARTICLE•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

    This article presents the results of a replication study in the humanities, more specifically in art history. The initial study was carried out in 1998–99 and concerned the attribution of two similar painted portraits of Rembrandt in the collections of the Mauritshuis in The Hague and the Germanisches Nationalmuseum in Nuremberg. In the replication study, the initial research questions were readdressed: Is the Mauritshuis version painted by Rembr…

  • Navigating Ambiguity and Uncertainty in End-of-Life Care Research Practice

    Open Access•Tom van Drimmelen, M Nienke Slagboom et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2025•Referências: 13

    Researchers frequently face conceptual, methodological, and ethical decisions - collectively known as researcher discretion - that can substantially influence research outcomes. Despite its importance, the nature of these discretionary moments and their triggers in everyday research practice remain underexplored. Based on an abductive thematic analysis of fieldnotes, documents, and interviews from twelve months of ethnographic fieldwork in two en…

  • Replication and replicability as epistemic opportunity for the humanities

    Open Access•Charlotte C S Rulkens, Rafael Peels et al.•ARTICLE•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

    Motivated by the ‘replication crisis’ that deeply impacted the biomedical, natural, and social sciences, we conducted a case study to examine the strengths and limitations of replication in the humanities. Specifically, we replicated an art historical Rembrandt attribution study. In this article we place the methodology and outcomes of the Rembrandt replication within the broader debate on replication in the humanities, with the aim of delving de…

Medicine (16 obras) · Psychology (13 obras) · Computer Science (11 obras) · Political science (10 obras) · Engineering (9 obras) · Sociology (7 obras) · Academic integrity and plagiarism (6 obras) · Ethics in Clinical Research (6 obras) · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 obras) · Alternative medicine (5 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae