Anna Tichler
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 6776994 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Anna Tichler |
| PRENOMES | Anna |
| SOBRENOME | Tichler |
| ASSINATURA | TICHLER A |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Maastricht University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7747-0946 |
| VERIFICADO | Sim |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 4 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 0 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 4 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2022 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 0 |
Uncovering the black box
Background and aim: Complex programs, with multiple components and stakeholders involved, are the norm rather than the exception in integrated care. With a focus on ‘what works, for whom, why, and under what circumstances’, Realist Evaluation (RE) offers a promising research paradigm to evaluate such programs in a transferable way. Furthermore, RE is highly participative: active involvement of program stakeholders is key to unearthing their perce…
Uncovering the black box
Background and aim: Complex programs, with multiple components and many stakeholders involved, are rather the norm than the exception in the field of integrated care. Experimental designs, with a focus on íf programs work, often disappointingly fail to open the black box about ‘why and how’ complex programs work. With a focus on ‘what works, for whom, why, and under what circumstances’, Realist Evaluation (RE) offers a promising research paradigm…
The development of a web-based patient decision aid for type 2 diabetes to support patients and their healthcare professionals in the treatment decision-making process
Introduction: Patient decision aids (PDAs) are useful tools in facilitating shared decision-making (SDM) between patients and healthcare professionals. The International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration developed a model for the systematic development of PDAs. However, there is still some uncertainty about which approach is most suitable for each step of the development process and questions remain on how to best involve pati…
What are people’s preferences for conversation topics in the decision-making process for the treatment of type 2 diabetes
The International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) is an online, open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles in the field of integrated care on a continuous basis.IJIC has an Impact Factor of 2.913 (2021 JCR, received in June 2022)The IJIC 20th Anniversary Issue was published in 2021
Sem obras proeminentes nesta página.
What are people’s preferences for conversation topics in the decision-making process for the treatment of type 2 diabetes
The International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) is an online, open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles in the field of integrated care on a continuous basis.IJIC has an Impact Factor of 2.913 (2021 JCR, received in June 2022)The IJIC 20th Anniversary Issue was published in 2021
Uncovering the black box
Background and aim: Complex programs, with multiple components and many stakeholders involved, are rather the norm than the exception in the field of integrated care. Experimental designs, with a focus on íf programs work, often disappointingly fail to open the black box about ‘why and how’ complex programs work. With a focus on ‘what works, for whom, why, and under what circumstances’, Realist Evaluation (RE) offers a promising research paradigm…
The development of a web-based patient decision aid for type 2 diabetes to support patients and their healthcare professionals in the treatment decision-making process
Introduction: Patient decision aids (PDAs) are useful tools in facilitating shared decision-making (SDM) between patients and healthcare professionals. The International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration developed a model for the systematic development of PDAs. However, there is still some uncertainty about which approach is most suitable for each step of the development process and questions remain on how to best involve pati…
Uncovering the black box
Background and aim: Complex programs, with multiple components and stakeholders involved, are the norm rather than the exception in integrated care. With a focus on ‘what works, for whom, why, and under what circumstances’, Realist Evaluation (RE) offers a promising research paradigm to evaluate such programs in a transferable way. Furthermore, RE is highly participative: active involvement of program stakeholders is key to unearthing their perce…
Computer Science (4 obras) · Political science (3 obras) · Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 obras) · Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 obras) · Knowledge management (2 obras) · Process (computing (2 obras) · Public relations (2 obras) · Alternative medicine (1 obras) · Black box (1 obras) · Business (1 obras)