Anuradha Saksena
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 732769 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Anuradha Saksena |
| PRENOMES | Anuradha |
| SOBRENOME | Saksena |
| ASSINATURA | SAKSENA A |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 11 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 16 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 11 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1975 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1985 |
| ÍNDICE H | 2 |
Verb agreement in Hindi, part II
A semantic model of causative paradigms
A case marking constraint
The basicness of transitives
This paper raises the question whether transitive or intransitive semantics is the more basic. Recently, the transformational analysis of causatives (Lakoff, 1970; McCawley, 1968) has proposed that transitives are derived from intransitives by a causative transformation — thus implying that intransitive semantics is more basic. Because the transformational model has been so influential 2 this claim has been carried over, often unquestioningly, in…
Case marking semantics
Contact in Causation
The distinction between contactive and non-contactive causation shows up repeatedly in languages (Masica 1976, Chap. 3; Cole 1976), and is claimed by Xolodovič 1969 to be ‘fundamental’ in their description. Arguing against earlier descriptions, this paper provides an alternate analysis of this important contrast
Verb agreement in Hindi
The source of causative contrast
The Affected Agent
It is commonly believed that agents constitute a single primitive category, distinct from other categories such as patient. This paper challenges such an assumption, arriving at three conclusions: (a) A variety of rules classify agents into affected vs. non-affected types. (b) These rules group affected agents with other affected roles such as patient, dative, and experiencer. (c) The affected/non-affected distinction is more basic than role dist…
A reanalysis of the passive in Hindi
A Case Grammar of Hindi (With a Special Reference to the Causative Sentences)
The Affected Agent
It is commonly believed that agents constitute a single primitive category, distinct from other categories such as patient. This paper challenges such an assumption, arriving at three conclusions: (a) A variety of rules classify agents into affected vs. non-affected types. (b) These rules group affected agents with other affected roles such as patient, dative, and experiencer. (c) The affected/non-affected distinction is more basic than role dist…
A Case Grammar of Hindi (With a Special Reference to the Causative Sentences)
A reanalysis of the passive in Hindi
A case marking constraint
The basicness of transitives
This paper raises the question whether transitive or intransitive semantics is the more basic. Recently, the transformational analysis of causatives (Lakoff, 1970; McCawley, 1968) has proposed that transitives are derived from intransitives by a causative transformation — thus implying that intransitive semantics is more basic. Because the transformational model has been so influential 2 this claim has been carried over, often unquestioningly, in…
Case marking semantics
A Case Grammar of Hindi (With a Special Reference to the Causative Sentences)
A reanalysis of the passive in Hindi
The source of causative contrast
The Affected Agent
It is commonly believed that agents constitute a single primitive category, distinct from other categories such as patient. This paper challenges such an assumption, arriving at three conclusions: (a) A variety of rules classify agents into affected vs. non-affected types. (b) These rules group affected agents with other affected roles such as patient, dative, and experiencer. (c) The affected/non-affected distinction is more basic than role dist…
Verb agreement in Hindi
The basicness of transitives
This paper raises the question whether transitive or intransitive semantics is the more basic. Recently, the transformational analysis of causatives (Lakoff, 1970; McCawley, 1968) has proposed that transitives are derived from intransitives by a causative transformation — thus implying that intransitive semantics is more basic. Because the transformational model has been so influential 2 this claim has been carried over, often unquestioningly, in…
Case marking semantics
Contact in Causation
The distinction between contactive and non-contactive causation shows up repeatedly in languages (Masica 1976, Chap. 3; Cole 1976), and is claimed by Xolodovič 1969 to be ‘fundamental’ in their description. Arguing against earlier descriptions, this paper provides an alternate analysis of this important contrast
A semantic model of causative paradigms
A case marking constraint
Verb agreement in Hindi, part II
Linguistics (10 obras) · Philosophy (10 obras) · Computer Science (8 obras) · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (8 obras) · Hindi (6 obras) · Philosophy (6 obras) · Verb (6 obras) · Artificial Intelligence (5 obras) · Psychology (5 obras) · Causative (4 obras)