Thomas O Mcgarity
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 764720 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Thomas O Mcgarity |
| PRENOMES | Thomas |
| SOBRENOME | O Mcgarity |
| ASSINATURA | MCGARITY T O |
| AFILIAÇÕES | The author is with the University of Texas School of Law, Austin. He is also with the Center for Progressive Regulation, Washington, DC. |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 8 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 19 |
| OBRAS COMO AUTOR | 8 |
| OBRAS COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1984 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2009 |
| ÍNDICE H | 3 |
Regulatory reinforcement of journal conflict of interest disclosures
A variety of economic and ideological forces threaten the integrity of public health research.1–4 In response, the editors of the top biomedical journals now require conflict of interest disclosures for submissions. Their increasingly extensive disclosure policies have resulted in some progress towards protecting the integrity of public health research by disclosing for readers potential sources of author bias.5 6 Yet the journal editors appear t…
Daubert and the Proper Role for the Courts in Health, Safety, and Environmental Regulation
Assigning a Daubert-like gatekeeper role to courts engaged in judicial review of risk assessments prepared by federal agencies is a profoundly bad idea. I describe the role of courts in reviewing regulatory agency decisionmaking and explore the potential impact of incorporating Daubert principles into administrative law. A Daubert form of judicial review will prevent agencies from employing a “weight of the evidence” approach, forcing them to ado…
Legislating “Sound Science”
In the late 1990s, in an effort to dispute the link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, Philip Morris initiated a campaign to legislate “sound science.” The campaign involved enacting data access and data quality laws to obtain previously confidential research data in order to reanalyze it based on industry-generated data quality standards. Philip Morris worked with other corporate interests to form coalitions and workgroups, develop a “dat…
Workers at Risk
OSHA's Failed Promise The Plight of America's Workers Regulatory Failure and Reform OSHA's History The Nixon/Ford Years: Inauspicious Beginnings The Carter Years: OSHA on the Move The Reagan Years: Going Backward The Reagan Years: Inching Forward The Reagan Years: Killing Time The Reagan Years: Tying Up Loose Ends The Reagan Years: New Initiatives The Reagan Years: Weakening Enforcement The Bush Years: An Identity Crisis Internal Reforms: Better …
Reinventing Rationality
Some Thoughts on "Deossifying" the Rulemaking Process
The informal rulemaking process of the 1990s is so heavily laden with additional procedures, analytical requirements, and external review mechanisms that its superiority to case-by-case adjudication is not as apparent now as it was before it came into heavy use. Perhaps of even more concern to regulatees and the general public is recent evidence that agencies are beginning to seek out alternative, less participatory regulatory vehicles to circumv…
The New Osha Rules and the Worker's Right to Know
"Hazard communication" rules issued by the Occupational Safety and\nHealth Administration (OSHA) in November 1983 require employers to label and\npost data for hazardous chemicals, disclose the use of such substances, and\npermit employee access to exposure records. McGarity examines the moral and\npractical implications of these rules, considering the competing interests of\nworkers' rights, state regulators, the economic cost to industry of pro…
Judicial Review of Scientific Rulemaking
Almost fifteen years have passed since the U.S. Congress initiated the last wave of statutes that required federal agencies to promulgate rules to protect the public health and safety and that empowered the appellate courts to review those rules. Quite early in the evolution of this new area of administrative law, the courts invoked the partnership metaphor to illuminate the interaction between the rulemaking agencies and the reviewing courts.' Y…
Legislating “Sound Science”
In the late 1990s, in an effort to dispute the link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, Philip Morris initiated a campaign to legislate “sound science.” The campaign involved enacting data access and data quality laws to obtain previously confidential research data in order to reanalyze it based on industry-generated data quality standards. Philip Morris worked with other corporate interests to form coalitions and workgroups, develop a “dat…
Daubert and the Proper Role for the Courts in Health, Safety, and Environmental Regulation
Assigning a Daubert-like gatekeeper role to courts engaged in judicial review of risk assessments prepared by federal agencies is a profoundly bad idea. I describe the role of courts in reviewing regulatory agency decisionmaking and explore the potential impact of incorporating Daubert principles into administrative law. A Daubert form of judicial review will prevent agencies from employing a “weight of the evidence” approach, forcing them to ado…
Regulatory reinforcement of journal conflict of interest disclosures
A variety of economic and ideological forces threaten the integrity of public health research.1–4 In response, the editors of the top biomedical journals now require conflict of interest disclosures for submissions. Their increasingly extensive disclosure policies have resulted in some progress towards protecting the integrity of public health research by disclosing for readers potential sources of author bias.5 6 Yet the journal editors appear t…
Judicial Review of Scientific Rulemaking
Almost fifteen years have passed since the U.S. Congress initiated the last wave of statutes that required federal agencies to promulgate rules to protect the public health and safety and that empowered the appellate courts to review those rules. Quite early in the evolution of this new area of administrative law, the courts invoked the partnership metaphor to illuminate the interaction between the rulemaking agencies and the reviewing courts.' Y…
The New Osha Rules and the Worker's Right to Know
"Hazard communication" rules issued by the Occupational Safety and\nHealth Administration (OSHA) in November 1983 require employers to label and\npost data for hazardous chemicals, disclose the use of such substances, and\npermit employee access to exposure records. McGarity examines the moral and\npractical implications of these rules, considering the competing interests of\nworkers' rights, state regulators, the economic cost to industry of pro…
Judicial Review of Scientific Rulemaking
Almost fifteen years have passed since the U.S. Congress initiated the last wave of statutes that required federal agencies to promulgate rules to protect the public health and safety and that empowered the appellate courts to review those rules. Quite early in the evolution of this new area of administrative law, the courts invoked the partnership metaphor to illuminate the interaction between the rulemaking agencies and the reviewing courts.' Y…
Some Thoughts on "Deossifying" the Rulemaking Process
The informal rulemaking process of the 1990s is so heavily laden with additional procedures, analytical requirements, and external review mechanisms that its superiority to case-by-case adjudication is not as apparent now as it was before it came into heavy use. Perhaps of even more concern to regulatees and the general public is recent evidence that agencies are beginning to seek out alternative, less participatory regulatory vehicles to circumv…
Reinventing Rationality
Workers at Risk
OSHA's Failed Promise The Plight of America's Workers Regulatory Failure and Reform OSHA's History The Nixon/Ford Years: Inauspicious Beginnings The Carter Years: OSHA on the Move The Reagan Years: Going Backward The Reagan Years: Inching Forward The Reagan Years: Killing Time The Reagan Years: Tying Up Loose Ends The Reagan Years: New Initiatives The Reagan Years: Weakening Enforcement The Bush Years: An Identity Crisis Internal Reforms: Better …
Daubert and the Proper Role for the Courts in Health, Safety, and Environmental Regulation
Assigning a Daubert-like gatekeeper role to courts engaged in judicial review of risk assessments prepared by federal agencies is a profoundly bad idea. I describe the role of courts in reviewing regulatory agency decisionmaking and explore the potential impact of incorporating Daubert principles into administrative law. A Daubert form of judicial review will prevent agencies from employing a “weight of the evidence” approach, forcing them to ado…
Legislating “Sound Science”
In the late 1990s, in an effort to dispute the link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer, Philip Morris initiated a campaign to legislate “sound science.” The campaign involved enacting data access and data quality laws to obtain previously confidential research data in order to reanalyze it based on industry-generated data quality standards. Philip Morris worked with other corporate interests to form coalitions and workgroups, develop a “dat…
Regulatory reinforcement of journal conflict of interest disclosures
A variety of economic and ideological forces threaten the integrity of public health research.1–4 In response, the editors of the top biomedical journals now require conflict of interest disclosures for submissions. Their increasingly extensive disclosure policies have resulted in some progress towards protecting the integrity of public health research by disclosing for readers potential sources of author bias.5 6 Yet the journal editors appear t…
Law (8 obras) · Political science (8 obras) · Business (6 obras) · Economics (5 obras) · Law and economics (5 obras) · Regulation and Compliance Studies (3 obras) · Engineering (2 obras) · Ethics in Clinical Research (2 obras) · Judicial review (2 obras) · Law (2 obras)