Robert J Boeckmann
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 837553 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Robert J Boeckmann |
| PRENOMES | Robert J |
| SOBRENOME | Boeckmann |
| ASSINATURA | BOECKMANN R J |
| AFILIAÇÕES | University of Alaska Anchorage |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 12 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 204 |
| OBRAS COMO AUTOR | 12 |
| OBRAS COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1997 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2020 |
| ÍNDICE H | 5 |
Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers
Perceived Legitimacy of Judicial Authorities in Relation to Degree of Value Discrepancy with Public Citizens
Alice in Wonderland
This film presents an excellent opportunity for critical viewing by families because it unflinchingly examines and critiques gender roles and explores identity development in late adolescence and y
That Community Becomes You? An Examination of Community Differences in Self-Objectification and Related Variables
The authors surveyed women from 2 communities: Anchorage, Alaska (N =51), an urban area, and Haines, Alaska (N=41), an isolated rural community. Participants from Haines scored lower on measures of self-objectification, internalization of sociocultural attitudes toward appearance, participation in beauty enhancement behaviors, and perceived normative beauty enhancement behaviors. Women from Haines also engaged in more empowering exercise (i.e., y…
Gender, Discrimination Beliefs, Group-Based Guilt, and Responses to Affirmative Action for Australian Women
Views of a selection committee's decision to promote a woman over a man on the basis of affirmative action were studied in a random sample of Australians (118 men and 111 women). The relations between perceptions of workplace gender discrimination, feelings of collective responsibility and guilt for discrimination, and judgments of entitlement to and, secondarily, deservingness of affirmative action were examined. AMOS analyses indicated that men…
Beliefs About Gender Discrimination in the Workplace in the Context of Affirmative Action
Hate Speech
Two experiments using Asian American university student participants examined the distinctive characteristics of responses to racist hate speech relative to responses to other forms of offense. The studies varied the target of insulting speech (Asian, African, and Overweight person) or the nature of offence (petty theft vs. insulting speech). Participant variables included collective self‐esteem and social identification. Results indicate that ha…
Understanding the Harm of Hate Crime
This article provides an overview of the context and content of this issue devoted to hate crime. Working definitions of hate crime and hate speech are situated within the broader context of intergroup relations, prejudice, aggression, and law and social policy. Theory and research from social psychology, criminology, and legal studies are utilized to describe this context. We present summaries of the multidisciplinary contributions to this issue…
Reactions to an offense in relation to authoritarianism, knowledge about risk, and freedom of action
This research investigated a situation where a fictitious company distributed contaminated meat that led to serious food poisoning. Participants ( N = 241) responded to scenarios that varied information about knowledge of risk (aware, unaware) and freedom of action (free to act, constrained by higher authority). They provided judgments concerning compliance, foreseeability, negligence, recklessness, seriousness of offense, responsibility, deservi…
Commonsense justice and inclusion within the moral community
Commonsense justice and inclusion within the moral community
Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers
This study examines why the public supports the punishment of rule breakers. It does so within the context of a recently enacted California initiative mandating life in prison for repeat felons (the "three strikes" law). Antecedents of three aspects of people's reactions to rule breakers are explored: (1) support for the three strikes initiative, (2) support for punitiveness in dealing with rule breakers, and (3) willingness to abandon procedural…
Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers
This study examines why the public supports the punishment of rule breakers. It does so within the context of a recently enacted California initiative mandating life in prison for repeat felons (the "three strikes" law). Antecedents of three aspects of people's reactions to rule breakers are explored: (1) support for the three strikes initiative, (2) support for punitiveness in dealing with rule breakers, and (3) willingness to abandon procedural…
Understanding the Harm of Hate Crime
This article provides an overview of the context and content of this issue devoted to hate crime. Working definitions of hate crime and hate speech are situated within the broader context of intergroup relations, prejudice, aggression, and law and social policy. Theory and research from social psychology, criminology, and legal studies are utilized to describe this context. We present summaries of the multidisciplinary contributions to this issue…
Hate Speech
Two experiments using Asian American university student participants examined the distinctive characteristics of responses to racist hate speech relative to responses to other forms of offense. The studies varied the target of insulting speech (Asian, African, and Overweight person) or the nature of offence (petty theft vs. insulting speech). Participant variables included collective self‐esteem and social identification. Results indicate that ha…
Commonsense justice and inclusion within the moral community
Perceived Legitimacy of Judicial Authorities in Relation to Degree of Value Discrepancy with Public Citizens
Beliefs About Gender Discrimination in the Workplace in the Context of Affirmative Action
Gender, Discrimination Beliefs, Group-Based Guilt, and Responses to Affirmative Action for Australian Women
Views of a selection committee's decision to promote a woman over a man on the basis of affirmative action were studied in a random sample of Australians (118 men and 111 women). The relations between perceptions of workplace gender discrimination, feelings of collective responsibility and guilt for discrimination, and judgments of entitlement to and, secondarily, deservingness of affirmative action were examined. AMOS analyses indicated that men…
Reactions to an offense in relation to authoritarianism, knowledge about risk, and freedom of action
This research investigated a situation where a fictitious company distributed contaminated meat that led to serious food poisoning. Participants ( N = 241) responded to scenarios that varied information about knowledge of risk (aware, unaware) and freedom of action (free to act, constrained by higher authority). They provided judgments concerning compliance, foreseeability, negligence, recklessness, seriousness of offense, responsibility, deservi…
Commonsense justice and inclusion within the moral community
Commonsense justice and inclusion within the moral community
Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers
This study examines why the public supports the punishment of rule breakers. It does so within the context of a recently enacted California initiative mandating life in prison for repeat felons (the "three strikes" law). Antecedents of three aspects of people's reactions to rule breakers are explored: (1) support for the three strikes initiative, (2) support for punitiveness in dealing with rule breakers, and (3) willingness to abandon procedural…
Reactions to an offense in relation to authoritarianism, knowledge about risk, and freedom of action
This research investigated a situation where a fictitious company distributed contaminated meat that led to serious food poisoning. Participants ( N = 241) responded to scenarios that varied information about knowledge of risk (aware, unaware) and freedom of action (free to act, constrained by higher authority). They provided judgments concerning compliance, foreseeability, negligence, recklessness, seriousness of offense, responsibility, deservi…
Hate Speech
Two experiments using Asian American university student participants examined the distinctive characteristics of responses to racist hate speech relative to responses to other forms of offense. The studies varied the target of insulting speech (Asian, African, and Overweight person) or the nature of offence (petty theft vs. insulting speech). Participant variables included collective self‐esteem and social identification. Results indicate that ha…
Understanding the Harm of Hate Crime
This article provides an overview of the context and content of this issue devoted to hate crime. Working definitions of hate crime and hate speech are situated within the broader context of intergroup relations, prejudice, aggression, and law and social policy. Theory and research from social psychology, criminology, and legal studies are utilized to describe this context. We present summaries of the multidisciplinary contributions to this issue…
Gender, Discrimination Beliefs, Group-Based Guilt, and Responses to Affirmative Action for Australian Women
Views of a selection committee's decision to promote a woman over a man on the basis of affirmative action were studied in a random sample of Australians (118 men and 111 women). The relations between perceptions of workplace gender discrimination, feelings of collective responsibility and guilt for discrimination, and judgments of entitlement to and, secondarily, deservingness of affirmative action were examined. AMOS analyses indicated that men…
Beliefs About Gender Discrimination in the Workplace in the Context of Affirmative Action
Alice in Wonderland
This film presents an excellent opportunity for critical viewing by families because it unflinchingly examines and critiques gender roles and explores identity development in late adolescence and y
That Community Becomes You? An Examination of Community Differences in Self-Objectification and Related Variables
The authors surveyed women from 2 communities: Anchorage, Alaska (N =51), an urban area, and Haines, Alaska (N=41), an isolated rural community. Participants from Haines scored lower on measures of self-objectification, internalization of sociocultural attitudes toward appearance, participation in beauty enhancement behaviors, and perceived normative beauty enhancement behaviors. Women from Haines also engaged in more empowering exercise (i.e., y…
Perceived Legitimacy of Judicial Authorities in Relation to Degree of Value Discrepancy with Public Citizens
Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers
Psychology (12 obras) · Political science (10 obras) · Social Psychology (10 obras) · Social Psychology (8 obras) · Law (7 obras) · Law (6 obras) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 obras) · Criminology (5 obras) · Economic Justice (4 obras) · Sociology (4 obras)