Christine J Kirchhoff
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 8520865 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Christine J Kirchhoff |
| PRENOMES | Christine J |
| SOBRENOME | Kirchhoff |
| ASSINATURA | KIRCHHOFF C J |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut at Storrs, Storrs, Connecticut |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 5 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 0 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 5 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2014 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 0 |
Beyond technical and financial feasibility
A research agenda for the science of actionable knowledge
Linking science with action affords a prime opportunity to leverage greater societal impact from research and increase the use of evidence in decision-making. Success in these areas depends critically upon processes of producing and mobilizing knowledge, as well as supporting and making decisions. For decades, scholars have idealized and described these social processes in different ways, resulting in numerous assumptions that now variously guide…
Advancing the scholarship and practice of stakeholder engagement in working landscapes
Participatory approaches to science and decision making, including stakeholder engagement, are increasingly common for managing complex socio-ecological challenges in working landscapes. However, critical questions about stakeholder engagement in this space remain. These include normative, political, and ethical questions concerning who participates, who benefits and loses, what good can be accomplished, and for what, whom, and by who. First, opp…
The Closer, the Better? Untangling Scientist–Practitioner Engagement, Interaction, and Knowledge Use
Scholarship on climate information use has focused significantly on engagement with practitioners as a means to enhance knowledge use. In principle, working with practitioners to incorporate their knowledge and priorities into the research process should improve information uptake by enhancing accessibility and improving users’ perceptions of how well information meets their decision needs, including knowledge credibility, understandability, and …
Moving Climate Information off the Shelf
While research focusing on how boundary organizations influence the use of climate information has expanded substantially in the past few decades, there has been relatively less attention to how these organizations innovate and adapt to different environments and users. This paper investigates how one boundary organization, the Great Lakes Integrated Sciences and Assessments Center (GLISA), has adapted by creating “boundary chains” to diversify i…
Sem obras proeminentes nesta página.
Moving Climate Information off the Shelf
While research focusing on how boundary organizations influence the use of climate information has expanded substantially in the past few decades, there has been relatively less attention to how these organizations innovate and adapt to different environments and users. This paper investigates how one boundary organization, the Great Lakes Integrated Sciences and Assessments Center (GLISA), has adapted by creating “boundary chains” to diversify i…
The Closer, the Better? Untangling Scientist–Practitioner Engagement, Interaction, and Knowledge Use
Scholarship on climate information use has focused significantly on engagement with practitioners as a means to enhance knowledge use. In principle, working with practitioners to incorporate their knowledge and priorities into the research process should improve information uptake by enhancing accessibility and improving users’ perceptions of how well information meets their decision needs, including knowledge credibility, understandability, and …
Advancing the scholarship and practice of stakeholder engagement in working landscapes
Participatory approaches to science and decision making, including stakeholder engagement, are increasingly common for managing complex socio-ecological challenges in working landscapes. However, critical questions about stakeholder engagement in this space remain. These include normative, political, and ethical questions concerning who participates, who benefits and loses, what good can be accomplished, and for what, whom, and by who. First, opp…
A research agenda for the science of actionable knowledge
Linking science with action affords a prime opportunity to leverage greater societal impact from research and increase the use of evidence in decision-making. Success in these areas depends critically upon processes of producing and mobilizing knowledge, as well as supporting and making decisions. For decades, scholars have idealized and described these social processes in different ways, resulting in numerous assumptions that now variously guide…
Beyond technical and financial feasibility
Computer Science (3 obras) · Knowledge management (3 obras) · Political science (3 obras) · Public relations (3 obras) · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (3 obras) · Business (2 obras) · Corporate governance (2 obras) · Engineering ethics (2 obras) · Scholarship (2 obras) · Social science (2 obras)