Mark T Palmer
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 90749 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Mark T Palmer |
| PRENOMES | Mark T |
| SOBRENOME | Palmer |
| ASSINATURA | PALMER M T |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Northwestern University |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 9 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 78 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 9 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1984 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1999 |
| ÍNDICE H | 6 |
Structuring the concept of relational communication
Since the distinction was first drawn between content and relational aspects of communication, the notion of relational communication has evolved from a unitary focus on dominance to a multi‐faceted concept that embraces as many as 12 subcomponents. With the aim of devising a theoretical structure to these many concepts, we advanced three proposals. First, we distinguished intensifier variables, such as involvement, and substantive variables, suc…
Communication Conflicts of Status and Authority in Dyadic, Task-Based Interactions
Status generalization theory predicts that high-status individuals will automatically assume high-authority roles controlling task-based interactions. However, temporary task demands may require low-status individuals to assume high-authority positions. If status generalizes, role conflicts may occur when high-status partners fail to yield control to low-status partners. lb test status generalization in legitimate role-reversal situations, airpla…
Communicating Intentions Through Nonverbal Behaviors Conscious and Nonconscious Encoding of Liking
Journal Article Communicating Intentions Through Nonverbal Behaviors Conscious and Nonconscious Encoding of Liking Get access Mark T. Palmer, Mark T. Palmer 1Mark T. Palmer is an assistant professor at Northwestern University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Karl B. Simmons Karl B. Simmons 2Karl B. Simmons is an assistant professor at Marquette University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Aca…
Relational Judgments in an Influence Context
We contend that communication episodes tend to focus interactants’attention on one or the other of two relational judgments: dominance or affiliation. Further, when one judgment is relatively more salient, individuals will use the salient judgment as the basis for inferring other aspects of the relationship. To test that notion, a judgment study was conducted in which participants viewed a set of influence messages that varied in degree of domina…
The effect of partners’ conversation on the association between attitude similarity and attraction
(1992). The effect of partners’ conversation on the association between attitude similarity and attraction. Communication Monographs: Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 180-189
Attitude similarity, relational history, and attraction
Perhaps the most well‐known finding in the study of interpersonal relations is that attitude similarity leads to attraction. Recent research has found that the similarity‐attraction effect is diminished after informal social interaction. The mediating effects of verbal and nonverbal behaviors in attenuating or strengthening the effects of similarity on attraction have not themselves been studied. The present experiment tests the similarity‐attrac…
Controlling conversations
This paper argues that controlling access to conversations by controlling how long partners may talk and on what topics they may talk is a form of interpersonal dominance. Research has shown that partners who talk more are usually considered more dominant, and partners who introduce more new topics in a conversation are considered more dominant. However, this research is typically conducted using non‐natural conversations and is based entirely on…
The Structure and Organisation of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviour
The question of the relationship between verbal and nonverbal behaviours is addressed from the point of view of the effects that these behaviours have on judgments that participants and observers make about persons enacting these behaviours. Behaviours that produce similar judgments may be said to have similar functions or meanings. Literature relevant to the effects of various verbal and nonverbal behaviours on judgments of control and affiliati…
Translation Accuracy
Structuring the concept of relational communication
Since the distinction was first drawn between content and relational aspects of communication, the notion of relational communication has evolved from a unitary focus on dominance to a multi‐faceted concept that embraces as many as 12 subcomponents. With the aim of devising a theoretical structure to these many concepts, we advanced three proposals. First, we distinguished intensifier variables, such as involvement, and substantive variables, suc…
Communicating Intentions Through Nonverbal Behaviors Conscious and Nonconscious Encoding of Liking
Journal Article Communicating Intentions Through Nonverbal Behaviors Conscious and Nonconscious Encoding of Liking Get access Mark T. Palmer, Mark T. Palmer 1Mark T. Palmer is an assistant professor at Northwestern University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Karl B. Simmons Karl B. Simmons 2Karl B. Simmons is an assistant professor at Marquette University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Aca…
Controlling conversations
This paper argues that controlling access to conversations by controlling how long partners may talk and on what topics they may talk is a form of interpersonal dominance. Research has shown that partners who talk more are usually considered more dominant, and partners who introduce more new topics in a conversation are considered more dominant. However, this research is typically conducted using non‐natural conversations and is based entirely on…
Attitude similarity, relational history, and attraction
Perhaps the most well‐known finding in the study of interpersonal relations is that attitude similarity leads to attraction. Recent research has found that the similarity‐attraction effect is diminished after informal social interaction. The mediating effects of verbal and nonverbal behaviors in attenuating or strengthening the effects of similarity on attraction have not themselves been studied. The present experiment tests the similarity‐attrac…
Relational Judgments in an Influence Context
We contend that communication episodes tend to focus interactants’attention on one or the other of two relational judgments: dominance or affiliation. Further, when one judgment is relatively more salient, individuals will use the salient judgment as the basis for inferring other aspects of the relationship. To test that notion, a judgment study was conducted in which participants viewed a set of influence messages that varied in degree of domina…
The effect of partners’ conversation on the association between attitude similarity and attraction
(1992). The effect of partners’ conversation on the association between attitude similarity and attraction. Communication Monographs: Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 180-189
Communication Conflicts of Status and Authority in Dyadic, Task-Based Interactions
Status generalization theory predicts that high-status individuals will automatically assume high-authority roles controlling task-based interactions. However, temporary task demands may require low-status individuals to assume high-authority positions. If status generalizes, role conflicts may occur when high-status partners fail to yield control to low-status partners. lb test status generalization in legitimate role-reversal situations, airpla…
Translation Accuracy
Translation Accuracy
Controlling conversations
This paper argues that controlling access to conversations by controlling how long partners may talk and on what topics they may talk is a form of interpersonal dominance. Research has shown that partners who talk more are usually considered more dominant, and partners who introduce more new topics in a conversation are considered more dominant. However, this research is typically conducted using non‐natural conversations and is based entirely on…
The Structure and Organisation of Verbal and Nonverbal Behaviour
The question of the relationship between verbal and nonverbal behaviours is addressed from the point of view of the effects that these behaviours have on judgments that participants and observers make about persons enacting these behaviours. Behaviours that produce similar judgments may be said to have similar functions or meanings. Literature relevant to the effects of various verbal and nonverbal behaviours on judgments of control and affiliati…
Attitude similarity, relational history, and attraction
Perhaps the most well‐known finding in the study of interpersonal relations is that attitude similarity leads to attraction. Recent research has found that the similarity‐attraction effect is diminished after informal social interaction. The mediating effects of verbal and nonverbal behaviors in attenuating or strengthening the effects of similarity on attraction have not themselves been studied. The present experiment tests the similarity‐attrac…
The effect of partners’ conversation on the association between attitude similarity and attraction
(1992). The effect of partners’ conversation on the association between attitude similarity and attraction. Communication Monographs: Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 180-189
Communication Conflicts of Status and Authority in Dyadic, Task-Based Interactions
Status generalization theory predicts that high-status individuals will automatically assume high-authority roles controlling task-based interactions. However, temporary task demands may require low-status individuals to assume high-authority positions. If status generalizes, role conflicts may occur when high-status partners fail to yield control to low-status partners. lb test status generalization in legitimate role-reversal situations, airpla…
Communicating Intentions Through Nonverbal Behaviors Conscious and Nonconscious Encoding of Liking
Journal Article Communicating Intentions Through Nonverbal Behaviors Conscious and Nonconscious Encoding of Liking Get access Mark T. Palmer, Mark T. Palmer 1Mark T. Palmer is an assistant professor at Northwestern University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Karl B. Simmons Karl B. Simmons 2Karl B. Simmons is an assistant professor at Marquette University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Aca…
Relational Judgments in an Influence Context
We contend that communication episodes tend to focus interactants’attention on one or the other of two relational judgments: dominance or affiliation. Further, when one judgment is relatively more salient, individuals will use the salient judgment as the basis for inferring other aspects of the relationship. To test that notion, a judgment study was conducted in which participants viewed a set of influence messages that varied in degree of domina…
Structuring the concept of relational communication
Since the distinction was first drawn between content and relational aspects of communication, the notion of relational communication has evolved from a unitary focus on dominance to a multi‐faceted concept that embraces as many as 12 subcomponents. With the aim of devising a theoretical structure to these many concepts, we advanced three proposals. First, we distinguished intensifier variables, such as involvement, and substantive variables, suc…
Psychology (8 obras) · Social Psychology (8 obras) · Social Psychology (7 obras) · Computer Science (6 obras) · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (6 obras) · Cognitive psychology (5 obras) · Artificial Intelligence (4 obras) · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 obras) · Communication (4 obras) · Communication (4 obras)