Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Marjolein Groefsema

Dados Biográficos

ID976839
NOMEMarjolein Groefsema
PRENOMESMarjolein
SOBRENOMEGroefsema
ASSINATURAGROEFSEMA M
AFILIAÇÕESUniversity of Hertfordshire
VERIFICADONão
TOTAL DE OBRAS6
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES44
TOTAL COMO AUTOR6
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO1992
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2013
ÍNDICE H3
  • Something out of nothing? Rethinking unarticulated constituents

    Open Access•Begoña Vicente, Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Journal of Pragmatics•2013•Citada por: 2•Referências: 27

  • The real-world colour of the dative alternation

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Language Sciences•2001

  • Processing for relevance

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Revista Alicantina de Estudios…•1998•Citada por: 2

    One of the basic claims of relevance theory is that because a communicator asks for the attention of the addressee, the addressee is entitled to assume that the communicator is trying to be relevant, and interpret an utterance according to this expectation. This paper addresses the question of what the consequences of this claim are for a model on on-line input processing, and proposes a model in which addressees interpret utterances in accordanc…

  • Can, may, must and should

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Journal of Linguistics•1995•Citada por: 17•Referências: 4

    In this paper I argue that the polysemy view is not capable of giving a unified account of the meanings of CAN, MAY, MUST and SHOULD, whereas the unitary meaning view does not encounter the problems facing the polysemy view. I propose unitary meanings which are rich enough to account for the range of interpretations these modals can have, but which are specific enough to account for why they get these interpretations and not others. Proposing uni…

  • Understood arguments

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Lingua•1995•Citada por: 11•Referências: 5

  • Can you pass the salt

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Lingua•1992•Citada por: 12•Referências: 7

  • Can, may, must and should

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Journal of Linguistics•1995•Citada por: 17•Referências: 4

    In this paper I argue that the polysemy view is not capable of giving a unified account of the meanings of CAN, MAY, MUST and SHOULD, whereas the unitary meaning view does not encounter the problems facing the polysemy view. I propose unitary meanings which are rich enough to account for the range of interpretations these modals can have, but which are specific enough to account for why they get these interpretations and not others. Proposing uni…

  • Can you pass the salt

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Lingua•1992•Citada por: 12•Referências: 7

  • Understood arguments

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Lingua•1995•Citada por: 11•Referências: 5

  • Something out of nothing? Rethinking unarticulated constituents

    Open Access•Begoña Vicente, Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Journal of Pragmatics•2013•Citada por: 2•Referências: 27

  • Processing for relevance

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Revista Alicantina de Estudios…•1998•Citada por: 2

    One of the basic claims of relevance theory is that because a communicator asks for the attention of the addressee, the addressee is entitled to assume that the communicator is trying to be relevant, and interpret an utterance according to this expectation. This paper addresses the question of what the consequences of this claim are for a model on on-line input processing, and proposes a model in which addressees interpret utterances in accordanc…

  • Can you pass the salt

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Lingua•1992•Citada por: 12•Referências: 7

  • Can, may, must and should

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Journal of Linguistics•1995•Citada por: 17•Referências: 4

    In this paper I argue that the polysemy view is not capable of giving a unified account of the meanings of CAN, MAY, MUST and SHOULD, whereas the unitary meaning view does not encounter the problems facing the polysemy view. I propose unitary meanings which are rich enough to account for the range of interpretations these modals can have, but which are specific enough to account for why they get these interpretations and not others. Proposing uni…

  • Understood arguments

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Lingua•1995•Citada por: 11•Referências: 5

  • Processing for relevance

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Revista Alicantina de Estudios…•1998•Citada por: 2

    One of the basic claims of relevance theory is that because a communicator asks for the attention of the addressee, the addressee is entitled to assume that the communicator is trying to be relevant, and interpret an utterance according to this expectation. This paper addresses the question of what the consequences of this claim are for a model on on-line input processing, and proposes a model in which addressees interpret utterances in accordanc…

  • The real-world colour of the dative alternation

    Open Access•Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Language Sciences•2001

  • Something out of nothing? Rethinking unarticulated constituents

    Open Access•Begoña Vicente, Marjolein Groefsema•ARTICLE•Journal of Pragmatics•2013•Citada por: 2•Referências: 27

Linguistics (6 obras) · Philosophy (6 obras) · Philosophy (5 obras) · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (5 obras) · Computer Science (4 obras) · Epistemology (4 obras) · Interpretation (philosophy (4 obras) · Psychology (4 obras) · Relevance (law (4 obras) · Cognition (3 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae