Michael E O'Hanlon

Dados Biográficos

ID984798
NOMEMichael E O'Hanlon
PRENOMESMichael E
SOBRENOMEO'Hanlon
ASSINATURAHANLON M E O
AFILIAÇÕESa Senior fellow at the Brookings Institution
VERIFICADONão
TOTAL DE OBRAS16
TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES46
TOTAL COMO AUTOR16
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO1997
ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO2019
ÍNDICE H4

  • The Senkaku Paradox

    Michael E O'HanlonBOOKThe Senkaku Paradox2019

  • Strategic Reassurance and Resolve

    James Steinberg, Michael E O'HanlonBOOKStrategic Reassurance and Resolve2015

  • The Science of War

    Michael O’hanlon, Michael E O'Hanlon et al.BOOKScience of War2009

  • Defense Strategy for the Post-Saddam Era

    Steven Metz, Michael O’hanlon et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal Canada s…2006

    The Brookings Institution has long produced an analysis of America's defense budgets and policies. The war on terror and the ongoing operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have forced upon this country soaring defense budgets and unprecedented challenges in policymaking. In the newest installment in this tradition, leading foreign policy expert Michael O'Hanlon offers policy recommendations for strengthening the ability of America's military to respo…

  • Arms Control and American Security

    Michael A Levi, Michael Levi et al.ARTICLECurrent History2005

    The United States and the world ... need a new strategy for controlling dangerous technologies in an age of terror

  • The Next Nuclear Wave

    Jon B Wolfsthal, Graham Allison et al.ARTICLEForeign Affairs2005

  • Expanding Global Military Capacity for Humanitarian Intervention

    Deborah Avant, Michael O’hanlon et al.ARTICLEInternational Journal Canada s…2004Citada por: 5

    Michael E. O'HanlonWashington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003. xiii, 125pp, US$46.95 cloth (ISBN 0-8157-6442-1), US$18.95 paper (ISBN 0-8157-6441-3)In a number of instances since the end of the Cold War, civil wars and other violent upheavals have elicited less than enthusiastic responses from the community. Michael O'Hanlon, a senior fellow in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, joins a variety of scholars who examine pra…

  • Missile defense after the ABM treaty

    James M Lindsay, Michael O’hanlon et al.ARTICLEThe Washington Quarterly2002

    As of mid‐June, the U.S. is free to develop, test, and deploy missile defenses in any fashion it sees fit. Yet, the administration has been short on details about the kind of defense it would build. What system is Washington likely to deploy? What should it

  • Limited National and Allied Missile Defense

    James M Lindsay, Michael O’hanlon et al.ARTICLEInternational Security2002Referências: 2

    International Security - Volume 26, Number 4, Spring 2002

  • Getting Serious About Iraq

    Philip H Gordon, Martin Indyk et al.ARTICLESurvival2002Citada por: 1

    Philip H. Gordon, Martin Indyk and Michael E. O’Hanlon are Senior Fellows in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution in Washington DC. Gordon is Director of Brookings’ Center on the United States and France and Indyk Director of Brookings’ Saban Center for Middle East Policy. Parts of this article draw on Philip Gordon and Michael O’Hanlon, ‘les defis de l’apres-Saddam’, which appeared in the summer issue of Politique internationale

  • A Flawed Masterpiece

    Michael O’hanlon, Michael E O'HanlonARTICLEForeign Affairs2002Citada por: 10

    THROUGHOUT most of the twentieth century, the U.S. armed forces were seen as an overmuscled giant, able to win wars through brute strength but often lacking in daring and cleverness. This basic strategy worked during the two world wars, making the United States relatively tough to challenge. But it failed in Vietnam, produced mediocre results in Korea, and worked in the Persian Gulf War largely because the terrain was ideally suited to American s…

  • Defending America

    Philip Zelikow, James M Lindsay et al.ARTICLEForeign Affairs2001Citada por: 3

    Arms control and missile defense are once again at the forefront of the American national security agenda. Not surprisingly, the debate has broken down along well-worn lines. Arms control advocates dismiss the idea of missile defense as a dangerous and costly folly. Missile defense advocates argue that the U.S. should move aggressively to defend itself against missile attack. With clear and lively prose free of partisan rhetoric, Defending Americ…

  • The United States in the balkans

    Ivo H Daalder, Michael O’hanlon et al.ARTICLEThe Washington Quarterly2000

    U.S. criticisms of Europe's efforts in the Balkans, though widely held, are deeply flawed. Focusing on the spring 1999 air war as a case study, the authors make their case for a sustained U.S. role alongside the existing larger European contributions

  • Winning Ugly

    Eliot A Cohen, Ivo H Daalder et al.ARTICLEForeign Affairs2000Citada por: 16

  • Unlearning the Lessons of Kosovo

    Ivo H Daalder, Michael O’hanlon et al.ARTICLEForeign Policy1999Citada por: 10

    irst, the mea culpas. Like many of the analysts looking at the war in Kosovo, we were (fortunately) wrong in several of our predictions. The air campaign succeeded. NATO achieved its objectives without launching a ground invasion or changing its demands. All Serbian forces have left Kosovo, some 50,000 NATO troops have entered in their wake, and more than 1 million refugees and displaced persons have returned home. This success is a testament to …

  • Humanitarian intervention

    Stephen J Solarz, Michael O’hanlon et al.ARTICLEThe Washington Quarterly1997Citada por: 1Referências: 5

    (1997). Humanitarian intervention: When is force justified? The Washington Quarterly: Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 2-14