Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Austro-Marxist Interpretation of Fascism

Dados Bibliográficos

ID10075646
AutoresGerhard Botz (autor correspondente)
Ano1976
Volume11
Fascículo4
Páginas129-156
Data de publicação1976-10-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Contemporary History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-0094 • E-ISSN: 1461-7250
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/002200947601100408
OpenAlexW85805380
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas1

In the period prior to the second world war, the Austrian social-democrats made a greater effort than other reformist labour movements to fit their own particular experiences and 'the actions which had been forced upon them into the [Marxist] system and to construct a science for their domestic use.'1 In certain respects, AustroMarxism, the result of these efforts, deserves for all its weaknesses to be set alongside the contemporaneous achievements of psychoanalysis, twelve-tone music and the 'Vienna School' of jurisprudential positivism. As a unified theoretical 'school', AustroMarxism was created in 1906 by Max Adler (1877-1937), Otto Bauer (1882-1938), Rudolf Hilferding.(1877-1941), Karl Renner (1870-1950) and a few others, and although it disintegrated under the impact of the first world war and the subsequent revolutionary processes, it continued to exert considerable, even international, influence as a movement of the socialist centre. Its members, despite the feuds they fought among themselves within the bosom of the Social Democratic Party organization feuds which, however, never went so far as to split that organization irrevocably continued to hold certain fundamental points of theory in common. And for a long time, both in their theory and their practice, they occupied a middle position somewhere between Bolshevism and Reformism.2 This essay sets out to examine how Austro-Marxism's leading representatives responded intellectually, at different periods, to the rise of fascism in all but a few European societies in the years between the two world wars. With what did the Austro-Marxists identify fascism? Into what categories did they try to fit it? To what causes and conditions did they attribute its appearance? The essay will, however, be concerned only marginally with the predictions Austro-Marxists made about the future course that fascism would take

Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Marxist philosophy · Political science · Politics · Central European national history · European history and politics · History · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law · Philosophy

  • Class Politics and the Authoritarian Personality

    Geoff M Boucher•International Critical Thought•2022

  • Hannah Arendt and Marxist Theories of Totalitarianism

    Open Access•Nicholas Devlin•Modern Intellectual History•2021

  • Economic power and political stability reconsidered

    Bernd Weisbrod•Social History•1979

  • The Kelsen-Bauer debate on Marxist state theory and the equilibrium of class forces

    Open Access•A Scott•Thesis Eleven•2021

  • Strukturveränderungen der Gesellschaft und politisches Handeln in der Lehre von Rudolf Hilferding

    Wilfried Gottschalch•Strukturveränderungen der…•1962

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano0,09
Intervalo de citações1979 - 2022 (44)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae