Understanding and celebrating advantaged boys

Education that excludes

Dados Bibliográficos

ID10106019
AutoresStef Rozitis (0000-0001-5841-1396, Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia, autor correspondente)
Ano2021
Volume54
Fascículo3
Páginas334-344
Data de publicação2021-03-02
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Educational Administration & History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-0620 • E-ISSN: 1478-7431
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00220620.2021.1894103
OpenAlexW3135134245
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas34

Under neoliberalism, parents as consumers are expected to provide their children with opportunities to get ahead. Governments defend elite schools on the grounds that ‘diversity’ and ‘choice’ are in the public interest but not everybody has an equal opportunity to choose. School websites act to promote specific images of schools with opportunities and advantages they claim to offer. A marketing video of the International Boys’ School Coalition reveals the specific masculinities and advantages touted as on offer in boys’ education. Globalised discourses of inclusion and merit are interrogated for hidden class and race inequities and advantage, as well as excluding girls and limiting identities of some boys. Schools that overwhelmingly produce the leaders of society are shown to reproduce unfair gender, class and race discourses limiting the possibilities for anyone excluded

Class (philosophy · Diversity (politics · Elite · Inclusion (mineral · Limiting · Neoliberalism (international relations · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Race (biology · School choice · Social science · Sociology · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender Studies · Global Education and Multiculturalism · Law · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics