Two Uses of Anekāntavāda
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 10126828 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Johannes Bronkhorst (0000-0002-5223-4090, University of Lausanne, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-07-27 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Indian Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-1791 • E-ISSN: 1573-0395 |
| Editora | Springer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10781-024-09577-5 |
| OpenAlex | W4401053256 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 12 |
The thesis I will present is that, whatever its exact origins, the anekāntavāda was primarily (though not exclusively) used for two purposes: (1) to solve the “paradox of causality”, and (2) to classify non-Jaina systems of thought. The earliest texts in which the doctrine occurs present it as a solution to the paradox of causality. Only later do we find its use to classify non-Jaina philosophies
Causality (physics · Doctrine · Epistemology · Philosophy of religion · Physics · Theology · Chinese history and philosophy · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy
| Citações por ano | 1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Altamente citado | Não |