Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Ditransitivity hierarchy, semantic compatibility and the realization of recipients in Korean dative constructions

Dados Bibliográficos

ID10139621
AutoresHanjung Lee (Sungkyunkwan University, autor correspondente)
Ano2020
Volume58
Fascículo1
Páginas37-72
Data de publicação2020-12-22
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-2267 • E-ISSN: 1469-7742
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0022226720000523
OpenAlexW3115507800
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas27

It has been observed that a subset of dative verbs that can express causation of possession such as cwu- ‘give’, ceykongha- ‘offer’ and cikupha- ‘pay’ may be found in the double accusative frame as well as in the DAT(ive)-ACC(usative) frame in Korean. These verbs contrast with transfer of possession verbs such as kennay- ‘hand’ and phal- ‘sell’ and verbs of sending and throwing, which are found in the DAT-ACC frame only. This paper presents a meaning-based account of the limited productivity of the dative/accusative alternation in Korean dative verbs. Building on Croft et al. (2001) and Levin (2004, 2008b), I argue that the semantic classes of dative verbs form an implicational hierarchy pure caused possession > transfer of possession > caused motion, which ranks verbs in terms of the degree of the compatibility with a caused possession event type. I suggest three criteria for compatibility between verb meaning and constructional meaning and show that the analysis of verb–construction pairings proposed here, when combined with an account of variation, provides a unified explanation for verb distribution patterns observed for ditransitive constructions within and across languages and the morphosyntactic expression of recipients of dative verbs in Korean. It accounts for the limited productivity of the dative/accusative alternation in dative verbs in Korean as a consequence of choosing the cut-off point at the highest end of this hierarchy, thus explaining why only the verb class that is most compatible with the caused possession event type, i.e. pure caused possession verbs, may be used ditransitively

Dative case · Linguistics · Modal verb · Possession (linguistics · Verb · Language and cultural evolution · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Semantics and cognition

    Ray S Jackendoff•Semantics and cognition•1986

  • The Relationships between Verbs and Constructions

    Adele Ε Goldberg•Lexical and syntactical…•1999

  • Language and Perception

    George A Miller, Philip N Johnson-Laird et al.•Language and Perception•1976

  • Semantic Interpretation In Generative Grammar

    Ray S Jackendoff•Semantic Interpretation In…•1974

  • Studies in Ditransitive Constructions

    Balthasar Bickel, Manoj Rai et al.•Studies in Ditransitive…•2010

  • Argument Structure and Ditransitive Verbs in Japanese

    Open Access•Shigeru Miyagawa, Takae Tsujioka•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2004

  • Valence Creation and the German Applicative

    Laura A Michaelis, Josef Ruppenhofer•Journal of Semantics•2000

  • An Aspectual Analysis of Ditransitive Verbs of Caused Possession in English

    John Beaver, J Beavers•Journal of Semantics•2011

  • Argument hierarchies and the mapping principle

    Eloise Jelinek, Andrew Carnie•Formal approaches to function in…•2003

  • Possessives in English

    Chris Barker, Maria Polinsky et al.•Language•1998

  • The English dative alternation

    Open Access•Malka Rappaport Hovav, Beth Levin•Journal of Linguistics•2008

  • Learnability and Cognition

    Open Access•Letitia Naigles•Language and Speech•1991

  • Possession and the double object construction

    Heidi Harley•Linguistic Variation Yearbook•2002

  • New facts from Fongbe on the double object constructions

    Open Access•Claire Lefebvre•Lingua•1994

  • In Support of the PHAVE Analysis of the Double Object Construction

    Heidi Harley, Hyun Kyoung Jung•Linguistic Inquiry•2015

  • Asymmetric ditransitive constructions

    Open Access•Lan Kim•Lingua•2015

  • Double Objects Again

    Beck, Sigrid Beck et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2004

  • Ditransitive Asymmetries and a Theory of Idiom Formation

    Benjamin Bruening•Linguistic Inquiry•2010

  • QR Obeys Superiority

    Benjamin Bruening•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  • The anomaly of the verb 'give' explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity

    Open Access•Seppo Kittilä•Linguistics•2006

  • Semantics and Syntactic Regularity

    Richard T Oehrle, Georgia M Green•Language•1977

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae